College Fraud Prosecutions Under Federal Law
✅ What is College Fraud?
College fraud refers to illegal actions involving deceit or misrepresentation related to higher education. These federal cases often involve:
Admissions fraud
Financial aid fraud
Student loan fraud
Bribery or test cheating schemes
Identity fraud
Misuse of federal funds by universities
🔒 Applicable Federal Statutes
18 U.S.C. § 1341 – Mail Fraud
18 U.S.C. § 1343 – Wire Fraud
18 U.S.C. § 371 – Conspiracy to Defraud the United States
20 U.S.C. § 1097 – Federal Student Aid Fraud
18 U.S.C. § 1001 – False Statements to the Government
18 U.S.C. § 1956 – Money Laundering
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) – 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961–1968
📚 Detailed Case Law: College Fraud Prosecutions
1. United States v. Singer (Varsity Blues Scandal), 2019–2021
Facts:
William “Rick” Singer masterminded a national admissions scam that allowed wealthy parents to pay bribes to secure their children’s admission to elite universities (e.g., Yale, USC, Stanford). He arranged fake athletic profiles, SAT/ACT cheating, and bribes to coaches and administrators.
Charges:
Racketeering conspiracy, conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud, money laundering.
Outcome:
Singer pleaded guilty and cooperated; dozens of parents, including celebrities like Lori Loughlin and Felicity Huffman, were convicted.
Importance:
Landmark case exposing systemic abuse of college admissions.
Set precedent for using RICO statutes in educational fraud.
Triggered reforms in admissions and oversight nationwide.
2. United States v. Abadi, 2005 (Eastern District of Virginia)
Facts:
Defendants created fake identities and enrolled in multiple colleges to obtain student loans and grants fraudulently. They used aliases and counterfeit documents.
Charges:
Conspiracy to commit student aid fraud, identity theft, wire fraud.
Outcome:
Convicted and sentenced to prison terms; ordered to pay restitution.
Importance:
Illustrates use of 20 U.S.C. § 1097 for fraudulently obtaining federal student aid.
First major case showing that individuals, not just institutions, can be held liable.
3. United States v. Borel, 2014 (5th Cir.)
Facts:
Defendant was a financial aid advisor who manipulated records and awarded ineligible students Pell Grants for a cut of the money.
Charges:
Conspiracy, federal financial aid fraud, and false statements.
Outcome:
Convicted and sentenced to 42 months in prison.
Importance:
Emphasized inside fraud—committed by school employees.
Federal aid fraud under Title IV of the Higher Education Act was central.
4. United States v. Dagnew, 2020 (District of Maryland)
Facts:
Dagnew was a senior executive at a for-profit college (ITT Tech). He participated in schemes to falsify student enrollment numbers and loan eligibility to keep federal funding flowing.
Charges:
Wire fraud, securities fraud, false statements.
Outcome:
Pleaded guilty; part of larger investigation into ITT’s collapse.
Importance:
Example of corporate-level fraud in the for-profit college sector.
Showed how inflating student data leads to fraudulent federal loan distributions.
5. United States v. Wilson, 2001 (7th Cir.)
Facts:
Wilson operated an unaccredited “diploma mill” that issued fake college degrees in exchange for money.
Charges:
Mail fraud, wire fraud, and making false academic claims.
Outcome:
Convicted; court upheld the sentence on appeal.
Importance:
Addressed the rise of diploma mills—fake schools selling credentials.
Set federal precedent on prosecuting fraudulent academic institutions.
6. United States v. Holzer, 2012 (Northern District of Georgia)
Facts:
College employee created fake student records and accepted kickbacks from students to process financial aid for those who never attended classes.
Charges:
Theft of government funds, student loan fraud, wire fraud.
Outcome:
Convicted and sentenced to prison.
Importance:
Highlights corruption within colleges enabling financial aid fraud.
Combines theft of government funds with misuse of aid.
7. United States v. Ammar, 2007 (District of Arizona)
Facts:
Defendants used stolen identities to enroll in community colleges and secure student aid funds, which they diverted for personal use.
Charges:
Aggravated identity theft, student loan fraud, wire fraud.
Outcome:
Guilty verdicts; multi-year sentences imposed.
Importance:
Shows how identity theft intersects with educational fraud.
Reinforced criminal liability for both aid misuse and ID theft.
⚖️ Legal Principles Established in These Cases
| Legal Concept | Explanation | Key Case(s) |
|---|---|---|
| Admissions fraud via bribery | Bribing officials to secure admission violates federal law | Singer (Varsity Blues) |
| Misuse of financial aid funds | Illegally obtaining Pell Grants or loans through false info | Abadi, Borel, Holzer |
| Falsification of enrollment data | Inflating numbers to qualify for federal funds is prosecutable | Dagnew (ITT Tech) |
| Identity theft for enrollment | Using stolen identities to defraud student aid systems | Ammar, Abadi |
| Diploma mill operations | Selling unearned degrees qualifies as mail and wire fraud | Wilson |
| Conspiracy and aiding others | Assisting others in fraud also punishable under conspiracy laws | Borel, Singer |
📌 Key Takeaways
Federal jurisdiction is triggered when fraud involves federal funds, mail, or wire communications.
Both individuals and institutions can face prosecution.
Financial aid fraud is one of the most commonly prosecuted forms.
Conspiracy charges are often added to net multiple participants in schemes.
Restitution and forfeiture of funds are common sentencing outcomes.
🚨 Penalties
Depending on the offense, penalties may include:
Prison time (up to 20 years for wire/mail fraud)
Fines (often hundreds of thousands of dollars)
Restitution (repayment of stolen federal funds)
Loss of federal funding or aid eligibility
RELATED Blog
0 comments