Confessions And Voluntariness
What is a Confession?
Confession is an admission by the accused person of guilt regarding the commission of a crime.
It is usually a statement acknowledging involvement or responsibility.
It is governed primarily by the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 and Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), 1973.
Why are Confessions Important?
Confessions can provide direct evidence of guilt.
They can lead to quick resolution of cases.
However, confessions can be unreliable if not voluntary.
Voluntariness of Confessions
A confession must be voluntary to be admissible as evidence.
Voluntariness means the confession should be made without coercion, threat, inducement, or promise.
It must be a product of free will and not obtained by force, torture, or any unfair means.
Relevant Legal Provisions
Section 24 of Indian Evidence Act: Confession caused by inducement, threat, or promise is irrelevant in criminal proceedings.
Section 25 of Indian Evidence Act: Confession made to police officer is generally inadmissible.
Section 26 of Indian Evidence Act: Confession made to police during custody, unless before magistrate, is inadmissible.
Section 27 of Indian Evidence Act: Information leading to discovery of a fact is admissible even if confession itself is not.
Section 164 of CrPC: Magistrate recorded confession is admissible.
Landmark Case Laws on Confession and Voluntariness
1. Nathulal v. State of Madhya Pradesh, AIR 1954 SC 381
Facts: Accused alleged that his confession was extracted under threat and torture.
Held: The Supreme Court held that a confession is only admissible if it is voluntary and not extracted by any threat or coercion. If doubt exists about voluntariness, the confession must be excluded.
Significance: Emphasizes that voluntariness is the touchstone of admissibility.
2. Rattan Singh v. State of Punjab, AIR 1965 SC 664
Facts: Accused made confession in police custody.
Held: The Court held confessions made to police officers are inadmissible under Section 25 of the Indian Evidence Act, regardless of voluntariness, to prevent police misuse.
Significance: Distinction between confessions to police (inadmissible) and to magistrate (admissible).
3. State of Uttar Pradesh v. Rajesh Gautam, AIR 2003 SC 3056
Facts: Confession recorded before magistrate challenged on grounds of coercion.
Held: The Supreme Court said confessions before magistrate are admissible if made voluntarily. Magistrate must ensure no coercion or inducement, failing which confession is inadmissible.
Significance: Importance of magistrate’s role in safeguarding voluntariness during recording of confession.
4. Kathi Kalu Oghad v. State of Bombay, AIR 1961 SC 1808
Facts: Accused claimed his confession was extracted by torture.
Held: Court held that where the confession was made after prolonged interrogation and with threat, it was not voluntary and hence inadmissible.
Significance: Defines voluntariness as absence of any force, threat, or mental pressure.
5. Gian Singh v. State of Punjab, AIR 1953 SC 54
Facts: Confession was retracted on ground of duress.
Held: The Court laid down factors to test voluntariness, including the accused’s mental condition, presence of threats or promises, and the manner of recording confession.
Significance: Sets out tests for voluntariness including timing, circumstances, and mental state.
6. Tukaram S. Dighole v. State of Maharashtra, (2010) 4 SCC 329
Facts: Confession recorded in custody under suspicious circumstances.
Held: Court reiterated that confession obtained by unfair means, inducement, or threat is inadmissible, reinforcing safeguards for accused’s rights.
Significance: Reaffirms protection against coerced confessions.
7. M.C. Chockalingam v. State, AIR 1958 SC 19
Facts: The accused was allegedly forced to confess.
Held: The Supreme Court emphasized that the prosecution must prove voluntariness beyond doubt.
Significance: Burden of proof lies on prosecution to prove confession was voluntary.
Summary of Key Principles on Confession and Voluntariness
Voluntariness is paramount: Without it, confession is inadmissible.
Confession to police officers is inadmissible, even if voluntary.
Confession before magistrate is admissible but magistrate must ensure voluntariness.
Confession obtained by threat, coercion, inducement, or torture is void.
The prosecution must prove voluntariness beyond reasonable doubt.
Retracted confessions need corroboration.
Safeguards exist to protect accused from forced confessions.
RELATED Blog
0 comments