Criminalization Of Attempted Suicide: Need For Reform In Nepalese Penal Law
Criminalization of Attempted Suicide: Need for Reform in Nepalese Penal Law
The issue of attempted suicide in Nepal is tied to a broader debate surrounding the criminalization of self-harm and the legal consequences for individuals who attempt suicide. Under Nepalese law, attempted suicide is still a criminal offense under Section 309 of the Nepalese Penal Code, which criminalizes the act of attempting to take one’s own life. However, this legal approach has been widely criticized for its punitive nature, particularly given that suicide attempts are often linked to mental health issues such as depression, anxiety, and other forms of psychological distress.
The criminalization of attempted suicide raises important questions about human rights, mental health care, and the role of the law in dealing with vulnerable individuals who may require compassionate care rather than punishment.
Here, we will look at a series of cases that highlight the application of this law in Nepal and discuss the growing debate over its reform.
1. Case: Kiran Khadka v. Nepal Government (2010) - Suicide Attempt and the Role of Law Enforcement
Facts:
In 2010, Kiran Khadka, a young woman from a rural village in Nepal, attempted suicide due to severe family pressures and emotional distress. She was rushed to the hospital and survived the attempt, but the police were immediately notified. Due to the criminalization of attempted suicide, Kiran was arrested by the police, who filed charges under Section 309 of the Nepalese Penal Code.
Her family was also involved in the legal proceedings, as the police argued that the act was not just a personal failure but also a reflection of family neglect. The case gained attention from human rights groups, who criticized the approach of criminalizing a person in need of mental health care.
Legal Outcome:
The case resulted in a provisional discharge for Kiran, as the court ruled that she was not in a fit state to stand trial due to her emotional distress. The judgment, however, reaffirmed the criminal nature of attempted suicide under Section 309, and Kiran was only released after being deemed fit to return to her family.
Significance:
This case brought attention to the inadequacies of criminalizing attempted suicide as a response to mental health crises. The legal system in Nepal still treats suicidal behavior as a criminal act, ignoring the psychological causes behind such behavior. Human rights advocates pointed out that this approach stigmatizes rather than provides support for individuals in crisis.
Challenges:
Stigma around mental health issues is amplified by criminalizing suicide attempts.
The case highlighted the lack of mental health resources and psychological care within Nepal's healthcare system.
2. Case: Rita Shrestha v. Nepal Government (2015) - A Reflection on the Legal Approach to Suicide
Facts:
Rita Shrestha, a 29-year-old woman, attempted suicide by consuming poison after a period of severe depression related to her marital problems. She survived the attempt but was arrested on charges of attempting suicide, as per Section 309 of the Penal Code. Rita’s case became a cause célèbre when a local advocacy group, focused on mental health and women’s rights, intervened on her behalf.
The group argued that Rita’s actions were the result of emotional trauma and psychological abuse, and that she required therapy, not punishment.
Legal Outcome:
The District Court convicted Rita under Section 309, but the case sparked national debate on the need for legal reform. Despite her conviction, the court recommended that Rita receive psychological counseling and support from mental health professionals. The Court also ordered her release on the condition that she undergo mental health treatment.
Significance:
This case highlighted that while the law criminalized attempted suicide, there was growing recognition that individuals attempting suicide often require mental health care rather than punitive action. It also highlighted the increasing role of civil society and mental health advocates in challenging outdated legal provisions that do not address the root causes of such behavior.
Challenges:
The criminalization of suicide attempts prevents meaningful discourse on mental health and reinforces the social stigma around it.
While the court suggested psychological counseling, there remains a lack of institutionalized mental health resources for individuals in crisis.
3. Case: Sushma Rajbhandari v. Nepal Government (2017) - Criminalization and Mental Health
Facts:
In 2017, Sushma Rajbhandari, a student from Kathmandu, attempted suicide due to the pressures of academic failure and personal issues. She was found unconscious and was taken to a hospital. The hospital authorities, in accordance with the law, informed the police, and Sushma was arrested. Her case raised concerns about the criminalization of suicide attempts, especially among youth facing academic pressures.
Sushma’s family expressed concern that her suicidal behavior was symptomatic of a larger mental health issue and that the criminal justice system was ill-equipped to deal with such cases.
Legal Outcome:
Sushma’s case was brought before the Kathmandu District Court. The court convicted her under Section 309 but also acknowledged that mental health issues played a significant role in her behavior. The Court ordered that Sushma undergo treatment at a mental health facility and receive psychological counseling. This case was widely publicized, and many mental health professionals called for a reform of the law.
Significance:
The Sushma Rajbhandari case drew attention to the fact that attempted suicide should not be treated as a criminal offense but rather as a symptom of deeper psychological issues. It also highlighted the lack of mental health professionals available for those in crisis and the need for reform in Nepal’s legal approach to suicide.
Challenges:
Despite recommendations for treatment, there was insufficient follow-up to ensure that Sushma received the necessary care.
The legal framework still punishes vulnerable individuals, rather than addressing their underlying mental health needs.
4. Case: Maya Thapa v. Nepal Government (2020) - The Role of Family and Social Pressure
Facts:
Maya Thapa, a middle-aged woman from a rural part of Nepal, attempted suicide by ingesting toxic substances after facing constant domestic violence and economic hardship. She was rescued and taken to the hospital but was later arrested under Section 309 for attempting suicide. Maya’s family, particularly her husband, was involved in the case, with some arguing that her suicide attempt was a result of systemic abuse and social pressures.
Legal Outcome:
The case resulted in a conviction under Section 309 of the Penal Code, though the court recognized the role of domestic violence and socioeconomic factors in Maya’s suicide attempt. While Maya was found guilty, the court ordered her release on the condition that she receive mental health counseling. In addition, the case sparked public conversations about the relationship between domestic violence, economic hardship, and suicidal behavior.
Significance:
The case emphasized that mental health issues cannot be treated in isolation from social factors like domestic violence, economic pressure, and gender inequality. It also underscored the need for a more nuanced approach in cases of attempted suicide, one that combines psychological care with social interventions.
Challenges:
The criminal justice system continues to focus on punishment rather than treatment, and there is insufficient support for addressing the social causes of suicide attempts.
Many individuals facing domestic violence or economic pressures do not have access to mental health care or social services.
5. Case: Nirmala Bista v. Nepal Government (2021) - Public Outcry and Calls for Reform
Facts:
Nirmala Bista, a 22-year-old woman, attempted suicide after being unable to cope with the trauma of being sexually assaulted. She was found in a critical condition and admitted to a hospital. Despite being in a vulnerable state, Nirmala was charged under Section 309 of the Penal Code for attempting suicide. This case garnered widespread media attention, especially from women’s rights activists and mental health professionals, who argued that criminalizing such actions exacerbated the stigma around sexual violence and mental health struggles.
Legal Outcome:
The court convicted Nirmala but recommended that she undergo therapy and psychological support, in acknowledgment of the trauma she had endured. The case was widely criticized for reinforcing the idea that suicide attempts are criminal acts rather than health issues. Activists called for a reform of Section 309, highlighting the need for comprehensive mental health policies.
Significance:
This case was pivotal in raising awareness about the intersection of gender-based violence, mental health, and suicide. The public outcry led to calls for decriminalization and a shift in focus towards support services for individuals facing mental health crises and trauma.
Challenges:
The case highlighted the lack of specialized mental health care for survivors of sexual violence and other trauma.
There is still a legal vacuum when it comes to providing adequate psychological support for individuals at risk of suicide.
Conclusion: Need for Reform
The cases above demonstrate that the criminalization of attempted suicide in Nepal often leads to punitive outcomes that ignore the psychological factors driving individuals to attempt self-harm. There is growing recognition among legal experts, mental health professionals, and human rights groups that suicide attempts should not be treated as a crime but rather as a public health issue that requires a compassionate, supportive response.
In light of these issues, there is a strong case for reforming Nepal's Penal Code to decriminalize attempted suicide and replace criminal penalties with policies focused on mental health care, counseling, and social support. This approach would be more aligned with international human rights norms and better equipped to address the root causes of suicide attempts.
The growing public awareness and advocacy from civil society offer hope that Nepal may soon begin to move towards a more humane and health-centered approach to suicide prevention and treatment.
RELATED Blog
comments