Public Health Violations As Criminal Offences
⚖️ I. Legal Framework: Public Health Violations in China
China criminalizes public health violations that endanger human life, spread infectious diseases, or harm community health. These fall under the Criminal Law of the PRC, Food Safety Law, Infectious Disease Prevention Law, and related regulations.
1. Criminal Law Provisions
Article 114: Endangering public safety through dangerous acts (e.g., spreading infectious diseases).
Article 330: Causing public health hazards by violating safety regulations in production or operation.
Article 331: Producing or selling counterfeit or substandard drugs, vaccines, or medical equipment.
Article 332: Violation of laws causing major harm to public health.
2. Key Principles
Offenses include intentional or negligent acts that endanger public health.
Penalties vary with intent, scale, and severity of harm.
Both individuals and institutions can be held criminally liable.
Public health violations are treated seriously, especially when infectious disease outbreaks or food safety crises occur.
🧑⚖️ II. Detailed Case Analyses
Case 1: 2008 Sanlu Milk Powder Scandal
Facts:
Sanlu Group produced infant formula contaminated with melamine, causing kidney damage in thousands of infants.
Charges:
Producing and selling toxic food (Article 330), causing public health hazard (Article 114).
Procedure:
Investigated by public security and food safety authorities.
Executives arrested and tried in Tianjin Intermediate Court.
Outcome:
CEO Tian Wenhua sentenced to life imprisonment, other executives received 10–15 years.
Company fined and assets confiscated.
Significance:
Landmark case demonstrating criminal accountability for corporate negligence endangering public health.
Case 2: 2011 Shanghai Vaccine Scandal
Facts:
Changsheng Biotechnology produced substandard rabies vaccines.
Charges:
Producing and selling counterfeit vaccines (Article 331), endangering public safety (Article 114).
Procedure:
Vaccine batches inspected; violations confirmed.
Trial in provincial court.
Outcome:
Executives sentenced to 7–15 years imprisonment, fines imposed.
Strict measures implemented to improve vaccine regulation.
Significance:
Highlights criminal liability in public health regulation violations by pharmaceutical companies.
Case 3: COVID-19 Wuhan Early Handling (2019–2020)
Facts:
Reports suggested local authorities delayed reporting COVID-19 outbreak, leading to wider spread.
Charges:
Negligence leading to public health hazards (Article 330), dereliction of duty by public officials (Article 397).
Procedure:
Investigations focused on administrative responsibility and criminal negligence.
Outcome:
Several local health officials and police officers were dismissed or penalized; some criminal charges for negligence were filed.
Significance:
Illustrates accountability for failure to control infectious diseases, even for officials.
Case 4: Illegal Production of Traditional Medicine (2015, Henan)
Facts:
Company produced herbal medicine contaminated with heavy metals.
Charges:
Producing and selling toxic medicines (Article 330), endangering public health (Article 114).
Procedure:
Seizure of contaminated products and laboratory testing.
Trial in Henan Intermediate Court.
Outcome:
Executives sentenced to 5–10 years imprisonment, company fined.
Significance:
Shows criminal responsibility extends to traditional medicine and herbal products.
Case 5: H1N1 Influenza Contamination Case (2010, Beijing)
Facts:
Laboratory staff failed to follow safety protocols, releasing H1N1 virus into controlled environment.
Charges:
Negligence causing public health hazard (Article 330), endangering public safety (Article 114).
Procedure:
Investigation by Ministry of Health and public security.
Trial focused on procedural violations in lab management.
Outcome:
Lab director and staff received 3–7 years imprisonment, administrative penalties.
Significance:
Highlights criminal accountability in scientific research and laboratories.
Case 6: Illegal Sale of Expired Drugs (2017, Guangdong)
Facts:
Pharmacy chain sold expired antibiotics to hospitals and consumers.
Charges:
Producing and selling harmful substances (Article 330), endangering public health (Article 114).
Procedure:
Inspections revealed systemic violations.
Evidence included purchase invoices, sales receipts, and drug testing.
Outcome:
Store managers sentenced to 5–8 years imprisonment, fines imposed, business license revoked.
Significance:
Demonstrates criminal liability for commercial negligence endangering community health.
🏛️ III. Observations
| Aspect | Findings from Cases |
|---|---|
| Offenders | Corporate executives, government officials, laboratory staff, pharmacies |
| Crimes | Producing/selling toxic food, substandard vaccines, contaminated medicine, failure to control disease |
| Evidence | Laboratory tests, product samples, invoices, official reports, public health investigations |
| Sentences | 3–20 years imprisonment; fines; confiscation; dismissal from office |
| Patterns | Corporate and administrative negligence receives severe punishment; public health risk drives criminal accountability |
🔹 IV. Conclusion
Public health violations are treated as serious criminal offenses in China.
Accountability applies to corporations, medical professionals, laboratory staff, and public officials.
Cases such as Sanlu Milk Powder, Shanghai vaccine scandal, COVID-19 mismanagement, Henan herbal medicine, H1N1 lab negligence, and expired drugs in Guangdong illustrate criminal enforcement.
Penalties are severe to protect public safety, prevent epidemics, and enforce product quality standards.
China’s approach emphasizes prevention, strict corporate oversight, and administrative accountability alongside criminal liability.
RELATED Blog
comments