Section 199 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, (BSA), 2023
The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA), 2023 is an important piece of legislation in India that deals with the admissibility of electronic evidence in courts. The Act is a response to the growing use of digital and electronic evidence in legal proceedings, offering a framework for its validation, handling, and submission in Indian courts.
Section 199 of the BSA, 2023:
Section 199 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 is particularly significant because it deals with the admissibility of electronic records in legal proceedings. Specifically, it outlines the conditions under which electronic records can be treated as valid evidence.
The section essentially facilitates the inclusion of electronic documents (such as emails, videos, text messages, and data stored on digital devices) as evidence, making them as legitimate as traditional paper-based documents in Indian courts.
Since this law is relatively new, there may not be many detailed real-world case studies or precedents. However, let's explore hypothetical case scenarios to understand how Section 199 would apply in practice.
1. Admissibility of Emails in a Contract Dispute
Case Overview:
A business disputes a contract with a supplier. The business claims that the supplier did not deliver goods as agreed upon. The business presents emails exchanged between the two parties, detailing the terms and conditions of the contract and the supplier's failure to deliver.
Application of Section 199:
Under Section 199, the emails can be admissible in court as evidence, provided the business demonstrates the authenticity of the emails. The court will require:
Certificate of authenticity under Section 65B (this section provides that any electronic record must be accompanied by a certificate that affirms its genuineness).
The sender's identity and the content of the emails must be verified to prove their relevance.
Outcome:
The court accepts the emails as valid evidence after verifying the certificate of authenticity and other supporting details. The emails are used to support the business's claim that the supplier violated the terms of the contract.
2. Digital Evidence in a Criminal Case (Cybercrime)
Case Overview:
A person is accused of defamation after allegedly posting false and harmful content about a business on a social media platform. The prosecution presents a series of screenshots and messages from the accused’s social media account to demonstrate defamation.
Application of Section 199:
In this case, the social media messages and screenshots could be admissible as evidence under Section 199. However, the prosecution must:
Prove that the screenshots are authentic (i.e., they were not altered or fabricated).
Provide a certificate under Section 65B confirming that the electronic records (social media posts) are original and have not been tampered with.
Outcome:
The court will assess the credibility of the digital evidence. If the authenticity is established through proper certification, the social media evidence can be treated as reliable, and the accused’s actions are examined in the context of the law on defamation.
3. Admissibility of Text Messages in a Family Dispute (Divorce Case)
Case Overview:
In a divorce case, one spouse presents a series of text messages between them and the other spouse to support allegations of infidelity. These messages are crucial to the case, as they contain conversations that appear to confirm the infidelity.
Application of Section 199:
The text messages could be admissible under Section 199, but several conditions must be met:
Authenticity: The spouse must prove that the messages are genuine and not fabricated or altered. They would need to produce the original device or a certificate that verifies the authenticity of the messages.
Relevance: The content of the messages must be directly relevant to the issue at hand (infidelity in this case).
Outcome:
The court would require a certificate under Section 65B to accept the text messages as evidence. If the certificate confirms the authenticity, and the messages are deemed relevant to the case, they would be used to support the claims of infidelity.
4. Admissibility of Video Surveillance in a Theft Case
Case Overview:
A store owner claims that an employee stole goods from the shop. The store owner presents video footage from security cameras showing the employee taking items without paying.
Application of Section 199:
Under Section 199, video surveillance footage can be admissible as evidence. However, to ensure its acceptance:
The store owner must provide a certificate of authenticity under Section 65B, confirming that the video footage has not been tampered with.
The store owner must also establish the chain of custody of the footage to prove it has not been altered since it was captured.
Outcome:
The court accepts the video footage as valid evidence after confirming its authenticity. The footage is used to support the store owner’s claim that the employee stole goods.
5. Admissibility of Digital Documents in a Property Dispute
Case Overview:
In a property dispute, one party presents a digitally signed document as evidence, claiming it is a legitimate contract related to the transfer of property rights. The opposing party challenges the document's authenticity, arguing it was forged.
Application of Section 199:
To admit the digital document as evidence under Section 199, the following conditions must be met:
The document must be in electronic form and must have an electronic signature or another form of authentication (e.g., a digital certificate).
The party presenting the document must provide a certificate under Section 65B, affirming the document’s authenticity and ensuring it was not tampered with.
Outcome:
If the certificate of authenticity is provided and the court finds the document to be legally valid, it will be treated as admissible evidence. The document will help establish the ownership or transfer of property rights in the case.
6. Admissibility of Digital Banking Records in Financial Fraud
Case Overview:
A person is accused of financial fraud involving money laundering. The prosecution presents digital banking records showing suspicious transactions and transfers to offshore accounts. The defense challenges the records, claiming they could have been manipulated.
Application of Section 199:
To admit the banking records under Section 199:
The prosecution must provide a certificate under Section 65B, which confirms that the banking records are authentic and have not been altered.
The prosecution might also need to prove the relevance of the transactions and the connection to the accused.
Outcome:
Once the certificate is provided and the authenticity of the records is established, the digital banking records are accepted as valid evidence in the case. The court uses them to examine the alleged fraudulent transactions.
Conclusion:
Section 199 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 modernizes how Indian courts handle electronic evidence, ensuring that digital records like emails, text messages, social media posts, video footage, and digital documents can be used effectively in legal proceedings. However, the law emphasizes authenticity and proper certification for these records to be admissible, as they are prone to manipulation or misinterpretation.
In all the hypothetical cases above, the key requirement is the provision of a certificate under Section 65B to verify the authenticity of the electronic evidence. Once this is established, digital evidence is treated as legally valid and can be used to support claims in civil, criminal, and family law disputes.
RELATED Blog
comments