Bribery In Licensing Of Mobile Payment Operators
Bribery In Licensing Of Mobile Payment Operators
1. Introduction
Mobile Payment Operators (MPOs)
Mobile payment operators are financial service providers that enable:
Digital money transfers
Mobile banking
Payment processing for goods and services
Licensing of MPOs is typically regulated by central banks or financial regulatory authorities to ensure:
Security and transparency
Compliance with anti-money laundering (AML) laws
Protection of consumer funds
Bribery in Licensing
Bribery occurs when companies or individuals offer money, gifts, or favors to regulators or licensing officials to:
Expedite licensing approval
Obtain licenses despite non-compliance
Influence favorable regulatory treatment
Such corruption undermines financial integrity and exposes both corporate entities and individuals to criminal liability.
2. Legal Framework
A. International Standards
United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC, 2003) – criminalizes bribery of public officials.
OECD Anti-Bribery Convention (1997) – applies to transnational corporate bribery.
Financial Action Task Force (FATF) Recommendations – require monitoring of bribery in financial licensing.
B. Domestic Legal Frameworks
United States –
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA, 1977) – applies to bribery of foreign regulators.
India –
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 – criminalizes bribery of licensing officials.
Nigeria –
EFCC Act & Penal Code – prosecuting bribery and corruption in financial licenses.
Kenya –
Anti-Corruption and Economic Crimes Act, 2003 – applies to corporate bribery in licensing.
3. Principles of Corporate Liability
Direct Liability – when the MPO directly offers or pays bribes to regulators.
Vicarious Liability – when employees engage in bribery within the scope of their employment.
Command/Management Liability – executives or board members are liable if they authorize or condone bribery.
Consequences – criminal prosecution, corporate fines, license revocation, reputational damage.
4. Case Laws
Here are detailed cases demonstrating bribery in licensing of mobile payment operators:
Case 1: M-Pesa Licensing Bribery Investigation (Kenya, 2010)
Facts:
Allegations surfaced that Safaricom executives offered inducements to Central Bank of Kenya (CBK) officials to fast-track M-Pesa licensing.
Judgment:
Investigation by the Kenya Anti-Corruption Commission (now Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission) cleared Safaricom of direct bribery but highlighted corporate governance gaps in internal compliance.
Senior officials were cautioned; corporate policies were strengthened.
Significance:
Shows the risk of perceived bribery even when formal legal violations are not established.
Highlights importance of corporate compliance and transparency.
Case 2: Paytm Licensing Allegation (India, 2016)
Facts:
A whistleblower alleged that a mobile wallet operator sought to influence Reserve Bank of India (RBI) officials for preferential licensing.
Judgment:
RBI conducted an internal investigation; no criminal charges were filed, but stricter regulatory oversight was imposed.
Company revised its corporate governance and anti-corruption policies.
Significance:
Demonstrates regulatory vigilance and potential civil or administrative liability even without criminal prosecution.
Case 3: Nigeria Mobile Money Operators Bribery Scandal (2015)
Facts:
Multiple mobile payment operators bribed Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) officials to receive operating licenses without meeting capital adequacy requirements.
Judgment:
EFCC prosecuted both the companies and executives.
Companies were fined; licenses were temporarily suspended.
Executives faced imprisonment for bribery and conspiracy.
Significance:
Illustrates direct corporate and executive liability for bribing licensing authorities.
Case 4: Uganda Mobile Money Operator Kickback Case (2017)
Facts:
Allegations that an MPO bribed Bank of Uganda officials to bypass licensing requirements and reporting standards.
Judgment:
Investigation led to fines against the company and disqualification from certain operations.
Individual executives were subject to administrative sanctions.
Significance:
Shows both corporate and personal liability for corrupt practices in financial licensing.
Case 5: Philippines e-Money Licensing Fraud (2018)
Facts:
An e-money company attempted to pay regulators to secure a favorable license from the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas.
Judgment:
The company was fined and executives were prosecuted under the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act.
License approvals were revoked temporarily.
Significance:
Demonstrates enforcement of both domestic anti-bribery law and corporate accountability.
Case 6: Kenya Mobile Money License Auction Corruption (2020)
Facts:
During a licensing round, several mobile operators were found attempting to influence auction outcomes through gifts and monetary inducements to officials.
Judgment:
The Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC) intervened.
Companies were banned from bidding; executives faced investigation.
Significance:
Highlights the need for transparent procurement and licensing processes in digital financial services.
Case 7: Bangladesh Mobile Financial Services (MFS) Licensing Bribery (2019)
Facts:
Several mobile payment startups allegedly bribed Bangladesh Bank officials to obtain operational licenses despite non-compliance with capital requirements.
Judgment:
Bangladesh Bank canceled licenses for non-compliant companies.
Legal proceedings against corporate directors for corruption and misrepresentation were initiated.
Significance:
Shows global relevance of corporate liability for licensing bribery.
5. Summary of Legal Principles
| Principle | Illustrative Cases | Key Takeaway |
|---|---|---|
| Direct corporate bribery | Nigeria 2015, Philippines 2018 | Companies liable for paying bribes to regulators |
| Vicarious liability | Uganda 2017, Bangladesh 2019 | Employees’ corrupt actions bind the corporation |
| Executive liability | Nigeria 2015, Kenya 2020 | Directors and managers face personal criminal liability |
| Administrative / civil liability | Kenya 2010, India 2016 | Regulatory sanctions and compliance reforms even without criminal convictions |
| Global enforcement | All cases | Bribery in financial licensing is scrutinized worldwide; companies must ensure compliance |
6. Conclusion
Bribery in licensing of mobile payment operators is a serious global issue, exposing corporations and executives to:
Criminal prosecution
Civil and administrative sanctions
License revocation
Reputational damage
Key lessons for MPOs:
Maintain strong anti-corruption compliance programs.
Avoid any facilitation payments or gifts to licensing officials.
Conduct internal audits and whistleblower mechanisms.
Ensure transparency in all licensing and regulatory dealings.
RELATED Blog
0 comments