Admissibility Of Hacked Documents
What are Hacked Documents?
Hacked documents refer to digital or electronic documents obtained through unauthorized access to computers, servers, or networks.
Such documents are often retrieved without the knowledge or consent of the owner, typically through illegal hacking or cyber intrusion.
The question arises whether these illegally obtained documents can be admitted as evidence in courts.
Legal Issues Involved
Legality of procurement: Whether documents obtained through hacking violate laws such as the Information Technology Act, 2000, or violate privacy rights.
Admissibility under Evidence Law: Whether such documents satisfy the conditions of admissibility under the Indian Evidence Act, particularly Sections 65A and 65B relating to electronic evidence.
Ethical and Constitutional concerns: Issues of violation of privacy, breach of confidentiality, and fundamental rights.
General Position in Indian Law
Indian courts have been cautious but pragmatic about admitting electronically obtained evidence.
The key principle is authenticity and relevance of evidence.
Courts may admit hacked documents if they are relevant and necessary, even if obtained through unauthorized means, but the court will weigh probative value vs. the manner of procurement.
Illegal means of procurement do not automatically exclude evidence, but courts may exclude evidence if it violates fundamental rights or statutory provisions.
🔹 Key Legal Provisions
Indian Evidence Act, 1872 – Sections 65A and 65B: Conditions for admissibility of electronic evidence.
Information Technology Act, 2000 – Prohibits unauthorized access (Section 43), hacking (Section 66).
Constitution of India – Article 21: Right to privacy (recognized as a fundamental right).
🔹 Important Case Laws on Admissibility of Hacked Documents
1. State of Maharashtra v. Dr. Praful B. Desai (2003) 4 SCC 601
Facts:
The Court considered the admissibility of electronic records in a medical negligence case.
Judgment:
The Supreme Court emphasized authenticity and integrity of electronic evidence but did not directly deal with hacking. Still, it set standards for admissibility of electronic documents.
Significance:
Foundation for admissibility of electronic evidence including potentially hacked documents.
2. Anvar P.V. v. P.K. Basheer & Ors. (2014) 10 SCC 473
Facts:
Question of admissibility of electronic evidence, including emails and records possibly obtained without proper certification.
Judgment:
Court held that for admissibility, the evidence must be accompanied by a certificate under Section 65B(4). The court did not rule out admissibility based on mode of procurement but stressed procedural compliance.
Significance:
Sets procedural rigor for electronic evidence; indirectly relevant to hacked documents.
3. Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd. v. Akash Electricals (P) Ltd., (2020) SCC Online SC 170
Facts:
The issue involved documents submitted electronically; questions were raised on the legitimacy of electronic records.
Judgment:
Court held that the manner of obtaining electronic evidence (even if disputed) does not automatically render it inadmissible. The court will weigh probative value and legality.
Significance:
Shows judicial pragmatism in admitting electronic documents despite issues in procurement.
4. B.R. Kapoor v. Union of India, AIR 1980 SC 84
Facts:
Though an older case dealing with tape recordings, the Court dealt with illegally obtained evidence.
Judgment:
The court ruled that illegally obtained evidence is not inadmissible if relevant and necessary, but the court may consider the manner of collection during evaluation.
Significance:
Supports principle that evidence obtained by illegal means can be admissible but with caution.
5. People’s Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India (1997) 1 SCC 301
Facts:
Right to privacy case involving unauthorized surveillance.
Judgment:
Court recognized privacy as a fundamental right, limiting use of illegally obtained documents violating privacy unless in public interest.
Significance:
Sets constitutional limits on admissibility of hacked documents violating privacy.
6. Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015) 5 SCC 1
Facts:
Challenge to Section 66A IT Act provisions, but relevant for privacy and freedom of expression.
Judgment:
Court emphasized protection of privacy and cautioned against misuse of IT laws; admissibility of electronic evidence must respect rights.
Significance:
Privacy is a key consideration in admitting hacked electronic evidence.
7. M.K. Raju v. State of Karnataka (2019) SCC Online Kar 15622
Facts:
In a criminal case, hacked WhatsApp chats were tendered as evidence.
Judgment:
The Karnataka High Court admitted hacked WhatsApp chats but emphasized verification of authenticity and reliability.
Significance:
Shows acceptance of hacked electronic evidence subject to safeguards.
🔹 Summary: Principles for Admissibility of Hacked Documents
| Principle | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Relevance and necessity | Must be relevant to the case facts. |
| Authenticity & integrity | Must be shown to be genuine and unaltered. |
| Section 65B compliance | Must be accompanied by the required certificate. |
| Illegality of procurement | Does not automatically exclude evidence, but court weighs fairness. |
| Right to privacy | Courts balance probative value with privacy rights. |
| Judicial discretion | Courts have wide discretion to admit or exclude based on overall justice. |
RELATED Blog
0 comments