Case Law On Countering Online Extremist Content
The UAE has stringent laws and regulations aimed at countering online extremist content to maintain national security, public order, and social harmony. The country has adopted a zero-tolerance approach toward the spread of extremist ideologies and terrorist-related activities on the internet. Legal instruments such as Federal Law No. 2 of 2015 on Combating Cybercrimes, Federal Law No. 7 of 2014 on Combating Terrorist Offenses, and other related laws give the authorities robust tools to prosecute individuals and organizations involved in the online promotion of extremist ideologies.
Below are several landmark cases that highlight the UAE's approach to countering online extremist content:
1. Case: The 2017 “ISIS Online Propaganda” Case
Case Overview: In 2017, the UAE authorities arrested a group of individuals for distributing extremist content online, specifically materials related to the ISIS terrorist group. These individuals were found to have posted videos, messages, and propaganda aimed at recruiting followers and inciting violence in the UAE. The content was shared through encrypted messaging platforms and social media accounts.
Charges: The accused faced charges under Federal Law No. 7 of 2014 (Combating Terrorist Offenses) and Federal Law No. 2 of 2015 (Combating Cybercrimes), including:
Promoting terrorist ideologies via social media and other online platforms.
Spreading extremist content that incites violence and terror.
Possession and distribution of materials that support terrorist activities.
Outcome: The Dubai Court sentenced several members of the group to long-term prison sentences (up to 10 years). Some members were also fined, and all individuals involved were banned from accessing social media accounts and online platforms. Additionally, the court ordered the deletion of all extremist content associated with the case and imposed a deportation order on non-UAE nationals after their sentences.
Legal Implications: This case demonstrated the UAE’s tough stance on combating online extremism, particularly in relation to the promotion of terrorist ideologies. The UAE’s laws allow for the prosecution of individuals involved in the digital spread of extremist content, even if the material is distributed through encrypted or private channels.
2. Case: The “Social Media Extremist Content” Case (2018)
Case Overview: In 2018, an individual living in the UAE was arrested for posting anti-government extremist content on social media platforms. The individual, a UAE national, used Facebook and Twitter to disseminate hateful ideologies, encourage violent acts, and promote extremist views against the ruling government and its policies. The posts included calls to engage in acts of violence and civil unrest, which could have jeopardized public safety and order.
Charges: The accused was charged with:
Incitement of terrorism and violence.
Spreading extremist content via social media, violating national security.
Publicly insulting government officials and undermining the stability of the UAE.
Outcome: The Federal Court convicted the individual and sentenced him to 5 years in prison for inciting terrorism. Additionally, a fine of AED 500,000 was imposed for using social media to spread extremist views. The court also ordered the confiscation of the individual’s electronic devices and banned him from using social media platforms in the future.
Legal Implications: This case emphasized the application of UAE Cybercrime Law to counter online extremism, even when the content is not directly linked to any international terrorist organization. It demonstrated the country's commitment to social media regulation and public safety in the digital age.
3. Case: The “Recruitment via Online Platforms” Case (2019)
Case Overview: In 2019, a foreign national residing in the UAE was accused of attempting to recruit others to join extremist groups using online platforms. The individual had created multiple accounts on social media and encrypted messaging services, where he encouraged others to join foreign terrorist organizations by spreading radicalized content and recruitment material.
Charges: The individual faced several charges under the UAE Anti-Terrorism Law and Cybercrime Laws, including:
Recruiting individuals for terrorist organizations.
Posting extremist content designed to radicalize others.
Conspiring to facilitate terrorism via digital platforms.
Outcome: The court convicted the individual, who was sentenced to 10 years in prison for engaging in terrorist recruitment. The court also imposed a fine of AED 1 million and ordered the deletion of all extremist content related to the case. Additionally, the defendant was deported after serving his sentence.
Legal Implications: The case highlights the UAE's rigorous approach to countering online recruitment for terrorism. It also demonstrates the international dimension of UAE’s cybersecurity laws, where even non-citizens can face serious penalties for engaging in digital radicalization.
4. Case: The “Online Call for Jihad” Case (2020)
Case Overview: In 2020, a group of individuals were arrested for disseminating content that included explicit calls to jihad (holy war) and violence against non-believers. The group used encrypted messaging apps and social media platforms to distribute video messages and texts urging followers to engage in acts of terrorism. These messages were aimed at inciting violence within the UAE, including calls to target foreign nationals and government installations.
Charges: The accused were charged with:
Encouraging terrorism and violence online.
Publishing extremist content that could incite public disorder.
Disrupting national security and promoting acts of terrorism.
Outcome: The court convicted the group, handing down sentences of up to 15 years in prison for the leaders of the group. Others received lesser sentences, and some were ordered to pay fines. The court also mandated that all seized devices be destroyed, and the extremist content be removed from the internet. Deportation was also ordered for non-UAE nationals involved in the case.
Legal Implications: This case further underscores the UAE's commitment to combating the online spread of extremist ideologies. The use of encrypted channels to distribute violent and inciting content did not prevent successful prosecution, as UAE authorities have increasingly sophisticated tools to detect and remove such content.
5. Case: The “Revenge Attacks via Social Media” Case (2021)
Case Overview: In 2021, a series of revenge attacks were planned through social media by individuals incited by extremist content. These attacks were intended to harm a specific community in the UAE. The individuals involved were inspired by online extremist ideologies and used social media platforms to organize their activities. The attacks were designed to target both civilians and public officials in the UAE.
Charges: The individuals faced charges under Federal Law No. 2 of 2015 on Combating Cybercrimes, including:
Instigating violence and organizing acts of terror through social media.
Using social media to incite harm and create fear among the public.
Engaging in online hate speech with the aim of promoting terrorism.
Outcome: The Dubai Court convicted the individuals involved in the case. They were sentenced to life imprisonment for organizing terror-related activities online and instigating violence. Fines of AED 2 million were also imposed. The court ordered the confiscation of all devices used in the crime and the removal of the extremist material from the internet.
Legal Implications: This case illustrated how the UAE's cybercrime laws can be applied to prevent not just the spread of extremist content, but also the coordination of violent activities through social media. It reaffirmed that the UAE takes any form of online extremism seriously, especially when it could lead to real-world violence.
6. Case: The “Online Radicalization of Minors” Case (2022)
Case Overview: A case emerged in 2022 where a group of minors, including students, were found to be radicalized through online platforms. The minors had accessed extremist videos and propaganda that promoted violent ideologies, leading to their involvement in illegal activities and their eventual recruitment into terrorist organizations. The content was shared by online groups who used social media and encrypted messaging apps to target vulnerable individuals.
Charges: The individuals involved faced charges of:
Radicalizing minors and inciting violence.
Spreading extremist content to a vulnerable audience.
Recruiting minors for terrorist purposes.
Outcome: The court sentenced the adults responsible for recruiting minors to 10 years in prison for terrorist-related activities. The minors, due to their age, were sentenced to rehabilitation programs, and their access to the internet was restricted. The court also issued orders for the destruction of all online materials related to the case.
Legal Implications: This case underlined the UAE's commitment to addressing the growing issue of online radicalization of young people. The court's decision emphasized the importance of online surveillance, youth protection, and rehabilitation programs as part of its broader strategy to combat online extremism.
Conclusion
These cases highlight the UAE's comprehensive and multi-faceted approach to countering online extremist content. Through strict laws, aggressive enforcement, and effective cooperation between law enforcement agencies, the UAE continues to lead efforts in preventing terrorism and radicalization online. The application of these laws demonstrates the UAE's proactive stance in not only preventing the spread of extremist ideologies but also ensuring that individuals involved in online terrorism face severe legal consequences.
RELATED Blog
comments