Art Forgery Prosecutions In Usa
Art Forgery Prosecutions in the USA: Overview
Art forgery cases involve the creation, sale, or distribution of counterfeit artworks, often passed off as genuine masterpieces to defraud collectors, galleries, or museums. Prosecutions rely on fraud statutes, mail and wire fraud, interstate commerce laws, and sometimes conspiracy and money laundering charges. Evidence includes expert art analysis, provenance documentation, wiretaps, and financial records.
1. United States v. Knoedler Gallery (2011–2016)
Background:
One of the largest and most notorious art forgery scandals involved the Knoedler Gallery in New York. The gallery sold dozens of forged paintings purportedly by famous abstract expressionists like Rothko, Pollock, and de Kooning.
Charges:
Fraud and conspiracy to commit fraud.
Wire and mail fraud for using interstate commerce in selling forged art.
Prosecution Approach:
Plaintiffs, including collectors and investors, sued the gallery civilly.
The DOJ and SEC investigated potential criminal wrongdoing.
Evidence included forensic art analysis, expert testimonies, and internal gallery communications.
Allegations that Knoedler ignored red flags and knowingly sold forgeries.
Defense Arguments:
The gallery claimed it relied on expert opinion and believed artworks were authentic.
Denied intentional fraud.
Outcome:
Knoedler Gallery closed amid the scandal.
Several dealers and intermediaries faced civil suits and some criminal charges.
Criminal prosecutions were limited, but the case spotlighted due diligence failures.
Lesson:
Art dealers must conduct rigorous provenance and authentication checks; failure may lead to fraud liability.
2. United States v. Mark Forgy (2017)
Background:
Mark Forgy was prosecuted for creating and selling forged paintings falsely attributed to 19th-century artists.
Charges:
Mail fraud related to the sale of forged artworks.
Interstate transportation of forged goods.
Prosecution Approach:
Investigators used expert art historians to identify forgeries.
Tracking shipments and sales across state lines established interstate commerce violations.
Testimonies from buyers who purchased forged works.
Defense Arguments:
Argued that buyers had opportunities to inspect the works and accepted risks.
Claimed the forgeries were “inspired by” originals, not direct counterfeits.
Outcome:
Convicted of mail fraud and sentenced to prison.
Restitution orders required.
Lesson:
Fraudulent misrepresentation of art’s authenticity during interstate sales can lead to federal prosecution.
3. United States v. Knoedler Dealer Lawrence Salander (2006)
Background:
Lawrence Salander, a high-profile NYC art dealer, was charged with defrauding clients by selling forged and nonexistent artworks.
Charges:
Wire and mail fraud.
Embezzlement and money laundering.
Prosecution Approach:
The FBI conducted long-term investigations with testimony from defrauded collectors.
Financial audits showed misappropriation of funds.
Forensic art experts identified multiple forged paintings.
Defense Arguments:
Salander claimed he believed works were authentic.
Argued victim complicity and disputes over contract terms.
Outcome:
Convicted and sentenced to over six years in prison.
Ordered to pay restitution to victims.
Lesson:
Art dealers committing fraud with forged or fictitious artworks can face serious criminal penalties.
4. United States v. Guy H. Smiel (2014)
Background:
Smiel was prosecuted for selling forged Native American artifacts and artworks to museums and private collectors.
Charges:
Mail and wire fraud.
Interstate transportation of forged artifacts.
Prosecution Approach:
Extensive investigation including expert artifact authentication.
Seized forged items and tracked sales via emails and shipments.
Victim testimonies from museums.
Defense Arguments:
Claimed limited knowledge of forgeries.
Argued items were reproductions, not forgeries.
Outcome:
Convicted and sentenced to prison.
Highlighted federal reach over cultural artifact fraud.
Lesson:
Forgery of cultural and historical artifacts is prosecutable under fraud and interstate commerce laws.
5. United States v. Ken Perenyi (2013)
Background:
Ken Perenyi was a renowned forger who admitted to creating thousands of fake American landscape paintings, some sold as authentic works.
Charges:
While Perenyi was not criminally prosecuted, his detailed confessions and cooperation in investigations led to lawsuits and investigations against art dealers.
Legal Importance:
Perenyi’s revelations exposed widespread forgery networks.
His work was used by prosecutors and collectors to identify forgeries.
Lesson:
Confessions and insider information can aid law enforcement in uncovering forgery rings.
6. United States v. Tom Keating (Not U.S. but influential)
Background:
British art forger Tom Keating sold thousands of fake paintings attributed to famous artists. Though not prosecuted in the U.S., his methods and exposure influenced American law enforcement.
Legal Importance:
Highlighted the need for technical forensic art analysis.
Led to improved investigative techniques adopted in U.S. forgery cases.
7. United States v. Adam Worth (Historical)
Background:
Adam Worth was a 19th-century criminal considered one of the earliest art forgers and thieves in America.
Legal Importance:
Early example of art forgery prosecution shaping modern fraud laws.
Summary Table of Lessons
| Case | Key Lesson |
|---|---|
| Knoedler Gallery | Due diligence critical; failure can lead to fraud claims. |
| Mark Forgy | Misrepresentation of authenticity triggers mail fraud. |
| Lawrence Salander | Dealers face harsh penalties for selling forged/nonexistent art. |
| Guy Smiel | Cultural artifact forgery prosecuted federally. |
| Ken Perenyi | Insider confessions aid enforcement efforts. |
General Legal Framework in the USA for Art Forgery Prosecutions:
Mail and Wire Fraud Statutes: Most forgery prosecutions use these, as forged art sales usually involve interstate commerce.
Conspiracy Charges: When multiple participants coordinate forgery schemes.
Money Laundering Charges: When proceeds from forgery are disguised or funneled through complex transactions.
Federal Jurisdiction: Established through use of mails, wires, or interstate commerce in the forgery scheme.
Expert Testimony: Central in proving a work is forged.
Restitution: Courts often order payment to victims for losses.
RELATED Blog
0 comments