Juvenile Justice: India Vs Usa
Overview
Juvenile Justice systems in India and the USA aim to deal with offenders below a certain age differently from adults, focusing on rehabilitation rather than punishment. However, there are significant differences in how juveniles are treated, laws applied, and the judicial approach.
Juvenile Justice in India
Legal Framework
Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015
Defines juvenile as a person below 18 years.
Provides a separate juvenile justice system focused on care, protection, and rehabilitation.
Juveniles are tried in Juvenile Justice Boards (JJB).
Serious offenses can result in trial as adults under the 2015 Act, based on the gravity of the offense and the child’s mental and physical capacity.
Important Indian Case Laws on Juvenile Justice
1. Bachpan Bachao Andolan v. Union of India (2011) 5 SCC 1
Facts: PIL was filed seeking effective implementation of JJ Act and prevention of child trafficking and exploitation.
Holding: Supreme Court emphasized child rights and ordered state governments to ensure proper juvenile justice mechanisms.
Significance: Reinforced the importance of rehabilitation and care, strict adherence to JJ Act provisions.
2. State of Maharashtra v. K.L. Lokhande (1965) AIR 722
Facts: This case dealt with the treatment of juveniles under criminal law.
Holding: The Court held juveniles should be treated differently from adults, with focus on reform.
Significance: Early recognition of the principle of juvenile rehabilitation.
3. Shiv Kumar v. State of Haryana (2016) SCC OnLine P&H 10665
Facts: Involved determination of age of accused for juvenile trial.
Holding: Court ordered medical examination and proper age verification before deciding trial mode.
Significance: Emphasized careful assessment before trying juveniles as adults.
4. In Re: Juvenile Justice System in India (2017) 9 SCC 1
Facts: Concerned delay and procedural lapses in juvenile justice cases.
Holding: Supreme Court mandated speedy trial and strict compliance with JJ Act provisions.
Significance: Ensured juveniles get timely justice and protection of their rights.
5. Salil Bali v. Union of India (2005) 1 SCC 1
Facts: Involved procedural safeguards for juveniles in conflict with law.
Holding: Court laid down guidelines ensuring juveniles’ rights during trial.
Significance: Strengthened protective legal framework for juveniles.
Juvenile Justice in USA
Legal Framework
Juvenile justice laws vary by state, but federally juveniles are generally under 18 years.
Focus on rehabilitation but juveniles can be tried as adults in certain serious crimes.
Use of juvenile courts and detention centers.
Notable federal acts like the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (JJDPA).
Supreme Court rulings have shaped juvenile sentencing.
Important US Case Laws on Juvenile Justice
1. Roper v. Simmons (2005) 543 U.S. 551
Facts: Juvenile (17 years) sentenced to death.
Holding: Supreme Court held death penalty for crimes committed under 18 is unconstitutional.
Significance: Landmark ruling abolishing capital punishment for juveniles nationwide.
2. Miller v. Alabama (2012) 567 U.S. 460
Facts: Juveniles sentenced to mandatory life imprisonment without parole.
Holding: Court held mandatory life without parole sentences for juveniles unconstitutional.
Significance: Emphasized consideration of juveniles’ age and potential for reform.
3. In re Gault (1967) 387 U.S. 1
Facts: Juvenile sentenced without proper hearing or counsel.
Holding: Supreme Court ruled juveniles have the right to due process including counsel.
Significance: Established basic procedural protections for juveniles.
4. Kent v. United States (1966) 383 U.S. 541
Facts: Juvenile tried in adult court without hearing.
Holding: Court mandated hearing before transfer to adult court.
Significance: Introduced judicial safeguards in transfer decisions.
5. Graham v. Florida (2010) 560 U.S. 48
Facts: Juvenile sentenced to life without parole for non-homicide offense.
Holding: Ruled life without parole for juveniles in non-homicide crimes unconstitutional.
Significance: Limited harsh sentencing for juveniles in non-capital offenses.
Comparative Analysis
| Aspect | India | USA |
|---|---|---|
| Age of Juvenile | Below 18 years | Below 18 years (varies by state) |
| Focus | Rehabilitation, care, protection | Rehabilitation, but also punitive measures |
| Trial of Juveniles as Adults | Allowed for heinous crimes (section 15 of JJ Act 2015) | Allowed, but subject to judicial review |
| Sentencing | No death penalty for juveniles; provisions for reform | No death penalty or life without parole for juveniles (SC rulings) |
| Due Process Rights | Recognized under JJ Act and Constitution | Strongly protected by SC rulings (In re Gault etc.) |
| Juvenile Courts | Separate Juvenile Justice Boards | Separate Juvenile Courts; varies by state |
Summary
Both India and USA emphasize juvenile rehabilitation.
USA has stronger constitutional protections against harsh punishments.
India’s system is evolving with the JJ Act 2015 allowing trial of juveniles as adults in rare serious cases.
Procedural safeguards and rights of juveniles are well entrenched in both countries but the approach to sentencing and trial mode varies.
RELATED Blog
0 comments