Right To Fair Trial Under Article 21 And Criminal Procedure
📘 I. Overview: Right to Fair Trial Under Article 21
Article 21 of the Constitution of India guarantees:
"No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law."
This provision has been judicially interpreted to include the right to a fair trial, an essential component of due process. The right to a fair trial ensures that:
The accused has the right to be heard.
The trial is conducted in a just, unbiased, and transparent manner.
There is equality before the law and non-arbitrariness.
The accused receives adequate legal representation.
The evidence is collected and presented fairly.
⚖️ II. Right to Fair Trial and Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC)
The Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 contains procedural safeguards that uphold the right to fair trial, including:
Section 41-60: Arrest procedures ensuring legality and safeguards.
Section 50: Informing the accused of grounds of arrest.
Section 161 & 164: Recording statements and confessions.
Section 207: Supply of documents to the accused.
Section 313: Examination of the accused by the court.
Section 436-437: Bail provisions.
Section 265: Conduct of trials.
These procedural rules ensure fairness, transparency, and equality during criminal trials.
🧑⚖️ III. Key Case Laws on Right to Fair Trial Under Article 21
1. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, AIR 1978 SC 597
Facts:
Maneka Gandhi’s passport was impounded without hearing.
Holding:
The Supreme Court expanded Article 21 to require ‘procedure established by law’ must be just, fair, and reasonable, incorporating due process.
Importance:
This landmark ruling made the right to fair procedure and fair trial a constitutional mandate, not just formal compliance with procedure.
2. Hussainara Khatoon v. State of Bihar, AIR 1979 SC 1369
Facts:
Thousands of undertrial prisoners were languishing in jail for extended periods without trial.
Holding:
The Court held that speedy trial is part of the right to fair trial under Article 21.
Importance:
This case emphasized the right to speedy trial as fundamental to preventing miscarriage of justice.
3. Khatri v. State of Bihar, AIR 1981 SC 928
Facts:
Questioned the legality of confessions made to police officers.
Holding:
The Court ruled confessions made to police are inadmissible under Section 25 of the Indian Evidence Act.
Importance:
Ensured protection against self-incrimination and coercive methods, upholding fair trial principles.
4. D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal, AIR 1997 SC 610
Facts:
Addressed custodial deaths and illegal detention.
Holding:
The Court issued guidelines for arrest and detention procedures (e.g., informing relatives, recording time and place).
Importance:
Strengthened procedural safeguards to protect the accused’s right to fair trial and prevent abuse.
5. State of Uttar Pradesh v. Rajesh Gautam, (2003) 5 SCC 611
Facts:
Challenge to refusal of bail.
Holding:
Reiterated the principle that bail is the rule and jail is the exception, linked with the presumption of innocence.
Importance:
Protected the accused’s liberty pending trial, crucial to fair trial rights.
6. Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar, (2014) 8 SCC 273
Facts:
Abuse of arrest powers under Section 498A (cruelty to wife) of IPC.
Holding:
The Court laid down strict guidelines to prevent arbitrary arrests and safeguard fair trial rights.
Importance:
Emphasized the right to liberty and fair procedure before arrest.
🔍 IV. Essential Components of Fair Trial Under Article 21 and CrPC
| Component | Explanation | Supporting Case Law |
|---|---|---|
| Right to be Informed | Inform accused of charges in a language understood by them. | Maneka Gandhi |
| Right to Counsel | Legal representation must be provided, especially to indigent accused. | Hussainara Khatoon |
| Right to Speedy Trial | Trials must be conducted without unreasonable delay. | Hussainara Khatoon |
| Right to Fair Evidence | Protection against illegal confessions and coerced evidence. | Khatri v. State |
| Right Against Self-Incrimination | Accused cannot be forced to testify against self. | Khatri v. State |
| Right to Reasoned Judgment | Courts must provide clear reasons for conviction or acquittal. | Mohammad Arif v. Registrar |
| Right Against Arbitrary Arrest | Arrest procedures must be legal and fair. | D.K. Basu and Arnesh Kumar |
| Right to Bail | Accused entitled to bail unless strong grounds to deny. | State of UP v. Rajesh Gautam |
📚 V. Summary Table of Important Cases
| Case Name | Key Holding |
|---|---|
| Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India | Due process and fair procedure under Article 21 |
| Hussainara Khatoon v. Bihar | Right to speedy trial |
| Khatri v. State of Bihar | Illegal confessions inadmissible |
| D.K. Basu v. West Bengal | Guidelines on arrest and detention |
| State of UP v. Rajesh Gautam | Bail is rule, jail is exception |
| Arnesh Kumar v. Bihar | Protection from arbitrary arrest |
✅ VI. Conclusion
Right to fair trial is an intrinsic part of Article 21 (right to life and liberty).
The CrPC operationalizes this right through procedural safeguards like lawful arrest, prompt trial, evidence rules, and bail.
The Supreme Court of India has been pivotal in expanding and enforcing these protections to ensure justice is done and seen to be done.
Fair trial guarantees are essential not only to protect the accused but to maintain public confidence in the criminal justice system.
RELATED Blog
0 comments