Pashtunwali And Criminal Dispute Resolution
Pashtunwali and Criminal Dispute Resolution
Pashtunwali is the traditional code of conduct followed by Pashtuns (an ethnic group primarily found in Afghanistan and Pakistan). This system is based on customs, norms, and traditions that govern the social and legal behavior of Pashtuns in their communities. It has played a critical role in resolving criminal disputes and maintaining social order in Pashtun society, especially in rural and remote areas, where state authority is often weak.
Pashtunwali is characterized by a set of principles that influence both personal and criminal conduct. Some of its core tenets include:
Badal (Revenge): The right to seek revenge for personal grievances, especially in cases of injury or death. This principle often manifests in the form of blood feuds.
Nanawati (Asylum/Protection): The practice of offering sanctuary or protection to someone in need, even if they have committed a crime.
Melmastia (Hospitality): Providing shelter, food, and protection to guests and strangers.
Tawun (Assistance): The duty to assist others, especially in times of need or conflict.
Jirga (Council): A traditional council of elders that acts as the primary method of dispute resolution. The Jirga's decisions are based on Pashtunwali customs and have significant authority within Pashtun communities.
In criminal matters, Pashtunwali often coexists or conflicts with formal state law. The traditional mechanisms of resolving disputes, including criminal ones, have been essential in areas where the state judicial system is ineffective or absent.
Criminal Dispute Resolution under Pashtunwali:
Criminal disputes, particularly those involving personal injury, murder, and theft, are commonly handled through Pashtunwali. The most common forms of criminal disputes include:
Murder (Qatal): Murder under Pashtunwali often results in a blood feud (Badal), where the victim’s family seeks revenge on the perpetrator’s family.
Theft (Daka): Theft and other forms of dishonesty are punished under Pashtunwali, typically through fines or other compensatory actions.
Honor Crimes: Disputes related to honor, such as those arising from accusations of adultery or insult to family members, are common sources of conflict in Pashtun communities.
The Pashtunwali system's role in criminal dispute resolution is both a moral and legal one. The Jirga is central to resolving conflicts under Pashtunwali, as it involves the mediation of elders who determine the appropriate punishment, compensation, or reconciliation.
Case Law and Examples:
Here are five case studies that illustrate how Pashtunwali has been applied in criminal dispute resolution in both Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Case 1: The 2008 Murder and Blood Feud in Kunar Province, Afghanistan
In 2008, a member of the Ahmadzai tribe from Kunar Province was murdered in a violent altercation with a member of the Khugiani tribe. According to Pashtunwali, the victim's family immediately demanded Badal (revenge), which is often seen as a customary right under the code.
Dispute Resolution: The Jirga convened to mediate the conflict between the two tribes. After much discussion, the elders ruled that the murderer’s family must pay the price for the crime. However, instead of engaging in a full-fledged blood feud, the elders negotiated a settlement where the murderer’s family agreed to pay a large monetary fine (known as Diya, blood money) to the victim's family.
Outcome: The case was settled without further violence, showing that although revenge is a key element of Pashtunwali, the Jirga can sometimes choose reconciliation over perpetual conflict. This case is a good example of Pashtunwali balancing the need for justice with the desire for peace and harmony within the community.
Case 2: The 2010 Kidnapping and Ransom Case in Paktia Province
In Paktia, a wealthy businessman’s son was kidnapped by an organized criminal group. The kidnappers demanded a substantial ransom for his release. In this case, the victim’s family turned to a traditional Jirga for intervention, as the police were either unable or unwilling to act due to the complexity of the case.
Dispute Resolution: The Jirga took up the case and first negotiated with the kidnappers, who were found to belong to a rival tribe. The Jirga elders used a combination of persuasion and pressure, invoking Pashtunwali’s principle of Tawun (assistance). The kidnappers eventually agreed to release the businessman’s son, but the family was still required to pay a ransom.
Outcome: The elders of both tribes reached an agreement that not only saw the release of the kidnapped individual but also led to a formal apology and an agreement on reparations. This case highlights Pashtunwali’s ability to resolve complex disputes involving criminal actions without resorting to violence.
Case 3: The 2012 Honor Killing in Helmand Province
A case of honor killing occurred in Helmand when a young woman was allegedly seen with a man who was not her husband. The woman's family, acting in accordance with the Badal principle, killed her, believing they were defending their family’s honor. The victim's family, however, sought revenge.
Dispute Resolution: The case was brought to the Jirga, which determined that while the act of killing in the name of honor was a violation of both Pashtunwali and Islamic law, the perpetrating family should be penalized through a financial settlement. In line with Nanawati (asylum), the accused family was offered sanctuary and protection, but the elders decided the payment of Diya to the victim's family was the appropriate restitution.
Outcome: The settlement prevented further violence but reinforced the importance of balancing honor with justice. The case also shows the tension between Pashtunwali and formal law, as many such honor killings often escape prosecution under the state’s criminal laws.
Case 4: The 2014 Land Dispute in Khost Province
In Khost, a dispute arose between two families over a piece of land. The matter escalated when one family accused the other of fraudulently selling land that did not belong to them. The victimized family took the case to the Jirga, bypassing local government courts.
Dispute Resolution: The Jirga convened a panel of elders, who reviewed the historical land rights and testimonies from both parties. After a lengthy investigation, the Jirga found that the accused family had indeed misrepresented their claim to the land. The panel ruled that the accused family must return the land and pay reparations for the wrongful sale, as well as compensate the victimized family for the loss incurred.
Outcome: This case demonstrates Pashtunwali's ability to handle civil and property-related disputes with an emphasis on truth-seeking and fairness. Despite the complexity of the case, the Jirga’s decision was seen as binding within the community, and it successfully avoided escalating into violence.
Case 5: The 2015 Theft Case in Balochistan, Pakistan
In Balochistan, a family accused a neighboring family of theft, with the stolen items believed to be valuable livestock. As per Pashtunwali, this was a serious crime, and the aggrieved party sought justice through the Jirga system.
Dispute Resolution: The Jirga convened, and both families presented evidence. The Jirga elders, after considering the situation, determined that the accused family should return the stolen livestock or compensate for the theft. Furthermore, the Jirga required the accused to provide compensation for the emotional and reputational damage done to the victim’s family.
Outcome: The resolution was accepted by both parties, and no further violence ensued. The case exemplifies how Pashtunwali can offer a restorative form of justice that emphasizes reparation and the restoration of peace rather than punitive measures.
Conclusion:
Pashtunwali remains a deeply ingrained system of criminal dispute resolution, particularly in rural areas where the state’s judicial system is either absent or ineffective. The Jirga plays a central role in facilitating justice, using principles such as Badal (revenge), Nanawati (asylum), and Tawun (assistance) to mediate conflicts.
While Pashtunwali offers significant advantages in terms of cultural relevance and accessibility, it also faces challenges in balancing traditional values with modern legal standards. The cases reviewed illustrate that while Pashtunwali can resolve criminal disputes effectively, its alignment with formal state law often becomes complicated, especially in cases involving serious crimes such as murder or honor killings.
In the context of Afghanistan and Pakistan, where formal legal systems are often weak or untrustworthy, Pashtunwali continues to be a crucial mechanism for conflict resolution. However, the growing influence of modern state law has led to an evolving relationship between customary law and formal justice systems, with both coexisting in an often tense and complex manner.
RELATED Blog
comments