Cryptocurrency-Related Crime Prosecutions

1. United States v. Ross Ulbricht ("Silk Road") (2015)

Background: Ross Ulbricht created and operated the Silk Road, an online black market using Bitcoin for illegal drug sales and other illicit goods.

Charges:

Conspiracy to commit narcotics trafficking

Conspiracy to commit money laundering

Conspiracy to commit computer hacking

Legal Significance:

One of the earliest major crypto-related criminal cases targeting darknet marketplaces using cryptocurrencies.

Outcome: Ulbricht was convicted on all counts and sentenced to life in prison without parole.

2. SEC v. BitConnect (2021)

Background: BitConnect was a crypto lending platform promising high returns, but it operated as a Ponzi scheme using new investors’ funds.

Charges:

Securities fraud

Operating an unregistered securities offering

Legal Significance:

Showed how the SEC applies securities laws to crypto projects falsely promising returns.

Outcome: The platform was shut down, and its promoters faced legal actions including fines and arrests.

3. United States v. Alexander Vinnik (2017)

Background: Vinnik was accused of operating BTC-e, a cryptocurrency exchange allegedly used for laundering billions of dollars from thefts and hacks.

Charges:

Money laundering

Operating an unlicensed money transmitting business

Legal Significance:

Demonstrated global efforts to crack down on crypto exchanges facilitating illicit transactions.

Outcome: Vinnik was arrested in Greece, faced extradition battles, and was sentenced in Russia.

4. United States v. Ilya Lichtenstein and Heather Morgan (2022)

Background: The couple was charged with laundering over $4.5 billion in stolen Bitcoin linked to the 2016 Bitfinex hack.

Charges:

Conspiracy to commit money laundering

Conspiracy to defraud the U.S.

Legal Significance:

Highlighted the difficulty and sophistication involved in tracing and recovering stolen cryptocurrency.

Outcome: Both were arrested; their case underscored law enforcement’s growing crypto forensic capabilities.

5. United States v. Ruja Ignatova ("OneCoin") (ongoing)

Background: Ignatova created OneCoin, a fraudulent cryptocurrency scheme described as a pyramid scheme targeting global investors.

Charges:

Wire fraud

Securities fraud

Legal Significance:

One of the largest crypto scams by volume, showing how crypto can be exploited in global frauds.

Outcome: Ignatova disappeared in 2017 and remains a fugitive, but multiple associates have been prosecuted.

6. United States v. Virgil Griffith (2021)

Background: Griffith, a researcher, was charged with conspiring to violate U.S. sanctions by giving a presentation on cryptocurrency technology in North Korea.

Charges:

Conspiracy to violate International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA)

Legal Significance:

Highlighted national security concerns around crypto technology transfers.

Outcome: Griffith pleaded guilty and was sentenced to 63 months in prison.

Summary Table

CaseCrime FocusChargesOutcome
Ross Ulbricht (Silk Road)Darknet marketplaceDrug trafficking, money launderingLife imprisonment
BitConnectPonzi schemeSecurities fraudShutdown, arrests
Alexander Vinnik (BTC-e)Money laundering via exchangeMoney launderingArrested, extraditions
Lichtenstein & Morgan (Bitfinex)Crypto theft launderingMoney launderingArrested, ongoing
Ruja Ignatova (OneCoin)Pyramid schemeWire fraud, securities fraudFugitive, associates convicted
Virgil GriffithCrypto tech sanctions breachConspiracy to violate sanctionsGuilty plea, prison

Quick Recap

Crypto crimes cover a wide range: from darknet drug markets to Ponzi schemes, laundering, and sanctions violations.

Prosecutors often rely on traditional laws applied to digital assets, including money laundering statutes, securities laws, and fraud statutes.

Many cases involve complex investigations including blockchain analysis and international cooperation.

LEAVE A COMMENT

0 comments