Sports Betting Violations Prosecutions In Usa
🔎 Overview: Sports Betting Violations in the U.S.
Sports betting in the U.S. has undergone a major legal transformation, especially after the Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Murphy v. NCAA, which struck down the federal ban on state-sponsored sports gambling.
However, even after legalization in some states, unregulated and illegal sports betting operations continue, and those engaged in:
unlicensed bookmaking,
interstate gambling,
money laundering, or
fixing games
are subject to criminal prosecution under various federal and state laws.
⚖️ Key Federal Statutes Used in Sports Betting Prosecutions
Illegal Gambling Business Act (IGBA) – 18 U.S.C. § 1955
Wire Act – 18 U.S.C. § 1084
Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA) – 31 U.S.C. §§ 5361–5367
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) – 18 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq.
Money Laundering – 18 U.S.C. § 1956
State laws – vary significantly; many still criminalize unauthorized sports betting.
🧑⚖️ Key Elements of Sports Betting Prosecutions
Operating without a license
Using wire or internet communication to place bets across state lines
Laundering gambling proceeds
Fixing or influencing the outcome of sports events
Violating state-specific betting laws
📝 Detailed Case Law: Sports Betting Violations
1. United States v. Cohen (Jay Cohen), 260 F.3d 68 (2d Cir. 2001)
Issue: Offshore sports betting targeting U.S. customers via the Internet.
Facts: Jay Cohen operated World Sports Exchange, an offshore betting site in Antigua. Though legal under Antiguan law, it accepted bets from U.S. citizens in violation of the Wire Act.
Holding: The Second Circuit upheld Cohen's conviction for violating the Wire Act.
Importance:
Landmark case confirming that offshore betting sites serving U.S. clients are still subject to U.S. law.
Demonstrated early federal efforts to prosecute internet gambling, even before UIGEA.
2. United States v. DiCristina, 726 F.3d 92 (2d Cir. 2013)
Issue: Operation of illegal gambling under IGBA.
Facts: DiCristina ran a private poker game with a rake, claiming poker wasn't covered under IGBA.
Holding: The appellate court reversed a lower court decision and ruled that poker falls within IGBA because it involves chance and profit.
Importance:
Confirmed that unlicensed poker and betting operations fall under illegal gambling statutes.
Helped define the scope of what counts as “gambling” under federal law.
3. United States v. Truesdale, 152 F.3d 443 (5th Cir. 1998)
Issue: Large-scale bookmaking business prosecuted under RICO and IGBA.
Facts: Defendant ran a sports betting ring across multiple states. The government used RICO to prosecute the operation as an ongoing criminal enterprise.
Holding: Conviction upheld. RICO applied because illegal sports betting was the core business activity.
Importance:
Shows use of RICO to target long-running sports gambling operations.
Emphasizes how betting violations can lead to organized crime charges.
4. United States v. Corrar, 512 F.3d 712 (2d Cir. 2008)
Issue: Money laundering tied to illegal gambling operation.
Facts: Corrar operated an illegal betting business and attempted to launder the proceeds through shell companies.
Holding: Conviction for both gambling and money laundering upheld.
Importance:
Demonstrates the frequent pairing of sports betting violations with financial crimes.
Emphasizes the role of bank records, cash flow, and structuring in building these cases.
5. United States v. Mazzie, 435 F.2d 307 (2d Cir. 1970)
Issue: Use of wire communications in gambling.
Facts: Mazzie used telephone lines to accept bets across state lines.
Holding: Conviction under the Wire Act was upheld.
Importance:
Classic application of the Wire Act to traditional bookmaking.
Established precedent for use of interstate communication as a key element.
6. United States v. Gotti, et al. (Eastern District of NY, 2008)
Issue: Sports betting tied to organized crime.
Facts: Members of the Gambino crime family were charged with running a large-scale illegal sports betting operation involving hundreds of millions of dollars.
Outcome: Multiple convictions for gambling, racketeering, and money laundering.
Importance:
Demonstrates the intersection of sports betting and organized crime.
Shows how betting operations are often prosecuted as part of larger criminal enterprises under RICO.
📊 Summary of Legal Principles from These Cases
| Legal Principle | Explanation | Representative Case |
|---|---|---|
| Wire Act applies to sports betting | Prohibits interstate bet transmission via wire or internet | Cohen, Mazzie |
| IGBA applies to private games | Illegal gambling businesses include poker and sports betting | DiCristina |
| RICO used for gambling rings | Betting operations as criminal enterprises | Truesdale, Gotti |
| Money laundering charges common | Attempting to conceal gambling proceeds | Corrar |
| Offshore betting not protected | Offshore legality doesn’t shield from U.S. laws | Cohen |
🚨 Enforcement Trends and Current Realities
Post-2018 (after Murphy v. NCAA), many states legalized and regulate sports betting.
Illegal betting still thrives in areas where:
Unlicensed bookies operate underground.
Online sites offer illegal access.
Organized crime controls betting operations.
Federal enforcement focuses on:
Unlicensed interstate operations
Tax evasion and money laundering
Game fixing or insider schemes
RELATED Blog
0 comments