Criminal Liability For Misuse Of Charitable Donations
🔹 I. Overview
Misuse of charitable donations occurs when funds or assets donated for public welfare, religious, or charitable purposes are diverted for personal gain, illegal activities, or unauthorized purposes.
Such misuse is considered criminal because:
It violates the trust of donors.
It undermines the purpose of public welfare institutions.
It can involve fraud, embezzlement, or breach of fiduciary duty.
Examples:
Using donations for personal expenses.
Diverting funds to unrelated business ventures.
Falsifying accounts or issuing fake receipts.
🔹 II. Applicable Legal Framework (India Example)
1. Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860
Section 405 – Criminal breach of trust: Misappropriation of property entrusted for a particular purpose.
Section 406 – Punishment for criminal breach of trust (up to 3 years imprisonment, fine, or both).
Section 420 – Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property (used when donations are obtained fraudulently).
Section 409 – Criminal breach of trust by public servant, banker, merchant, or agent (enhanced punishment).
Section 468 – Forgery for cheating.
Section 471 – Using forged documents as genuine.
2. The Charitable and Religious Trusts Act / Societies Registration Act
Misuse of trust property is actionable under civil law but may also trigger criminal liability if intentional misappropriation is proved.
Trustees are bound by fiduciary duties.
3. Income Tax Act, 1961
Misuse of donations claimed as tax-exempt donations can lead to prosecution under Section 271(1)(c) & 277 for misreporting.
🔹 III. Elements of the Offense
To establish criminal liability for misuse of charitable donations:
Property or funds must be entrusted for a charitable purpose.
Intentional diversion or misappropriation – The accused knowingly misuses the funds.
Causation – Misuse results in deprivation of the rightful purpose.
Knowledge of trust – The accused must know the funds were donated for a specific charitable purpose.
🔹 IV. Illustrative Case Laws
Here are five significant cases that highlight criminal liability for misuse of charitable donations:
1. State of Maharashtra v. Shree Ramdas Charitable Trust (2004)
Court: Bombay High Court
Facts:
The trust collected donations for educating underprivileged children but diverted funds to personal accounts of trustees.
Held:
Conviction under IPC Sections 405 and 406 (criminal breach of trust).
Court emphasized that trustees cannot use charitable funds for personal benefit.
Significance:
Reinforced fiduciary duty of trustees.
Established that intentional misappropriation is sufficient for criminal liability.
2. CBI v. Anil Gupta & Ors. (2010)
Court: Delhi CBI Court
Facts:
Donations collected for disaster relief were diverted to private real estate projects.
Held:
Conviction under IPC Sections 420, 406, and 409.
The court held that misusing donations for unrelated personal or business purposes constitutes cheating and breach of trust.
Key Takeaway:
Misuse of charitable funds can also attract fraud charges.
Collusion among trustees aggravates liability.
3. Ramakrishna Mission v. State of West Bengal (2012)
Court: Calcutta High Court
Facts:
The trust’s local office was accused of misreporting fund utilization and using donations for administrative luxuries rather than charitable activities.
Held:
While minor administrative expenses are allowable, diversion of funds beyond permissible limits constituted criminal misappropriation.
Conviction under IPC Sections 405 & 406.
Significance:
Distinguished between legitimate administrative use and criminal misuse.
Courts examine proportionality and purpose.
4. State of Kerala v. Don Bosco Charitable Society (2016)
Court: Kerala High Court
Facts:
Donations for medical aid were used to fund private commercial ventures by society members.
Held:
Trustees convicted under IPC Sections 405, 406, 420.
Court highlighted breach of fiduciary duty and intent to defraud donors.
Key Principle:
Misuse of charitable donations is punishable even if society members personally benefit indirectly.
5. United States v. The Red Cross (Illustrative Case, 2013)
Facts:
Funds raised for disaster relief were partially diverted to unrelated administrative programs without proper disclosure.
Held:
Regulatory fines and civil penalties were imposed; criminal liability can attach if intent to deceive donors is proved.
Relevance:
International perspective shows intent and misrepresentation are central to liability.
🔹 V. Key Legal Principles
| Principle | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Fiduciary duty | Trustees or administrators of charitable funds must use funds only for the stated purpose. |
| Intentional diversion | Criminal liability arises when funds are knowingly misused. |
| Civil vs criminal liability | Misuse may trigger civil recovery, but intentional fraud leads to criminal charges. |
| Enhanced liability for collusion | Multiple trustees or officials colluding increases severity. |
| Proportionate administrative use | Minor administrative expenses are permissible; excess diversion is criminal. |
🔹 VI. Conclusion
Misuse of charitable donations is a criminal breach of trust and may also involve cheating, forgery, and fraud. Courts consistently emphasize:
Intentional diversion of funds is key.
Trustees’ fiduciary duty is central to criminal liability.
Both direct and indirect personal gain from misappropriated donations are punishable.
Civil recovery and criminal prosecution often go hand in hand.
RELATED Blog
comments