Bankruptcy Fraud And Concealment Of Assets
I. Bankruptcy Fraud and Concealment of Assets — Legal Framework in Finland
In Finland, bankruptcy fraud and concealment of assets are criminal offenses regulated primarily under the Criminal Code (Rikoslaki, 39/1889) and the Bankruptcy Act (Konkurssilaki, 120/2004).
1. Key Legal Provisions
| Provision | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Criminal Code, Chapter 36 §1 – Fraud (petos) | Punishment for intentionally deceiving a creditor or bankruptcy estate. |
| Criminal Code, Chapter 36 §3 – Aggravated Fraud | Applies if the fraud is particularly severe. |
| Criminal Code, Chapter 36 §10 – Concealment of Assets (varojen kätkeminen) | Hiding, transferring, or destroying assets to prevent creditors from claiming them. |
| Bankruptcy Act, Chapter 15 & 16 | Duties of the debtor in bankruptcy, including disclosure of assets and avoidance of preferential treatment. |
2. Elements of the Offense
To constitute bankruptcy fraud or concealment:
Debtor is aware of insolvency or bankruptcy proceedings.
Intentionally hides, transfers, or disposes of assets.
The act harms creditors or the bankruptcy estate.
There is proof of intent, not mere negligence.
Sanctions can include:
Fines,
Imprisonment (typically up to 2–6 years depending on severity),
Disqualification from holding corporate office.
II. Case Law in Finland — Detailed Examples
Here are five notable Finnish cases demonstrating bankruptcy fraud and asset concealment:
1. KKO 2003:59 — Deliberate Concealment of Assets
Facts
A company owner declared bankruptcy but had transferred valuable equipment to a relative before filing.
The bankruptcy trustee discovered these transfers.
Legal Issue
Was transferring assets to relatives before bankruptcy a criminal act?
Decision
The Supreme Court convicted the owner of concealment of assets under Chapter 36 §10 of the Criminal Code.
Reasoning
Transfers were made intentionally to avoid creditor claims.
The timing indicated knowledge of impending bankruptcy.
The act directly reduced recoverable assets for creditors.
Significance
Early transfers to relatives can be treated as criminal concealment, even if legal title is formally transferred.
2. KKO 2007:88 — False Accounting to Hide Debts
Facts
A company falsified accounting records to hide cash assets and overstated liabilities.
Creditors were misled during bankruptcy proceedings.
Legal Issue
Can falsifying accounts to hide assets amount to bankruptcy fraud?
Decision
Supreme Court convicted the managing director of fraudulent bankruptcy activity.
Reasoning
False accounting intentionally misled creditors and the bankruptcy estate.
The deception was material — it affected the trustee’s ability to recover funds.
Criminal intent was established through consistent misrepresentation.
Significance
Fraudulent bookkeeping is a serious offense in Finnish bankruptcy law.
Intent to deceive creditors or the trustee is essential for criminal liability.
3. KKO 2010:52 — Concealment of Cash and Property
Facts
A debtor moved significant cash sums to a foreign bank account shortly before declaring bankruptcy.
The bankruptcy trustee discovered the accounts later.
Legal Issue
Does hiding funds abroad constitute criminal concealment?
Decision
The Supreme Court held that the debtor committed concealment of assets.
Reasoning
The transfer had no legitimate business purpose, and timing suggested intent to evade creditors.
Hiding assets in foreign accounts is considered a deliberate act harming the bankruptcy estate.
Significance
Cross-border transfers do not protect debtors from liability.
Finnish law prioritizes creditor protection over complex avoidance strategies.
4. KKO 1999:48 — Sale of Property Below Market Value
Facts
A debtor sold company property at below-market value to a family member before filing for bankruptcy.
The sale depleted assets available to creditors.
Legal Issue
Can a pre-bankruptcy sale at a reduced price constitute criminal fraud?
Decision
The Court convicted the debtor of bankruptcy fraud.
Reasoning
Sale was intentionally structured to keep property outside the bankruptcy estate.
The discounted sale lacked economic justification.
Creditors were clearly harmed by the undervalued transfer.
Significance
Sales to relatives or friends at unreasonably low prices are treated as fraudulent asset concealment.
5. KKO 2015:61 — Hiding Corporate Accounts and Loans
Facts
A director of a company hid several corporate accounts and personal loans to himself before bankruptcy.
Creditors and the trustee were misled about the company’s financial position.
Legal Issue
Does hiding accounts and loans constitute criminal bankruptcy fraud?
Decision
The Supreme Court confirmed conviction for bankruptcy fraud and concealment of assets.
Reasoning
Concealment prevented full realization of estate assets.
Deliberate misrepresentation of finances is criminally punishable.
The Court highlighted that intentional misstatement of financial position fulfills the actus reus of fraud.
Significance
Full transparency of accounts and assets is mandatory for debtors.
Any intentional concealment can trigger criminal charges.
III. Key Principles from Finnish Case Law
From these cases, several important principles emerge:
Intent is crucial
Negligence or honest mistakes usually do not amount to criminal liability.
The courts focus on deliberate attempts to mislead creditors or trustees.
Timing matters
Transfers or concealment immediately prior to bankruptcy are strong evidence of criminal intent.
Related parties cannot shield assets
Transferring to relatives or foreign accounts does not protect the debtor.
Finnish courts consistently look at the substance over form.
Methods of concealment
Cash transfers, sales below market value, false accounting, hidden accounts, or loans to insiders are all actionable.
Severity of punishment correlates with harm
Higher recoverable loss or complex concealment schemes typically lead to imprisonment rather than fines.
IV. Conclusion
Bankruptcy fraud and concealment of assets in Finland are serious criminal offenses, protected under both the Criminal Code and Bankruptcy Act.
The cases above (KKO 2003:59, 2007:88, 2010:52, 1999:48, 2015:61) illustrate that Finnish courts focus on:
Intentional misconduct,
Timing relative to insolvency,
Harm to creditors, and
Concealment mechanisms.
The jurisprudence sets clear warnings for debtors: attempting to hide assets or mislead creditors will likely result in criminal liability.
RELATED Blog
comments