Digital Evidence In Cybercrime And Fraud Prosecutions
Digital evidence has become the backbone of prosecuting cybercrime and online fraud. It includes data from computers, smartphones, emails, social media, online banking records, and other electronic sources. Proper collection, preservation, and interpretation of digital evidence are crucial for successful prosecution. Below is a detailed explanation of notable Indian cases demonstrating the role of digital evidence in cybercrime and fraud prosecutions.
1. State of Tamil Nadu v. Suhas Katti (2004)
Background:
Suhas Katti sent obscene and defamatory emails about a woman after she rejected his proposal, harassing her online through Yahoo message groups.
Digital Evidence Used:
Email headers and server logs were used to trace the messages to Katti.
Electronic records served as primary evidence under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act.
Outcome:
Katti was convicted under Section 67 of the IT Act and Sections 469 and 509 of the IPC.
Significance:
This case was the first in India to secure a conviction solely based on electronic evidence, setting a precedent for cyber harassment cases.
2. Indian Bank ATM Card Fraud Case (2016)
Background:
A gang hacked multiple bank accounts through ATM card skimming and phishing, stealing lakhs of rupees from account holders across Maharashtra.
Digital Evidence Used:
ATM transaction logs and CCTV footage.
IP addresses and server logs traced the cybercriminals’ activities.
Outcome:
The accused were convicted under Sections 66C (identity theft) and 66D (cheating by personation) of the IT Act, along with Section 420 of the IPC for fraud.
Significance:
Demonstrated the importance of banking transaction logs, IP tracking, and digital surveillance as evidence in financial cybercrime cases.
3. Rajesh Kumar v. State of Delhi (2019)
Background:
Rajesh Kumar created fake social media profiles of women to harass, defame, and extort them.
Digital Evidence Used:
Social media account logs and screenshots of conversations.
Metadata from electronic communications linking Kumar to the accounts.
Outcome:
Convicted under Sections 66C, 66D of the IT Act and defamation under IPC, he received five years’ imprisonment and fines.
Significance:
Highlighted how social media and online interactions are admissible digital evidence in cyber harassment and fraud cases.
4. Hyderabad Online Data Theft Case (2023)
Background:
An IT assistant at Telangana Raj Bhavan was arrested for digitally morphing a female colleague’s photos and stealing confidential office data from a hard drive.
Digital Evidence Used:
Metadata from morphed images confirming time and date of edits.
Access logs from the office network confirming unauthorized access.
Outcome:
The accused was prosecuted under Sections 66C (identity theft), 66E (violation of privacy), and IPC sections for theft and criminal breach of trust.
Significance:
Showcased the role of digital evidence in proving both cyber harassment and internal organizational data theft.
5. Vodafone Phishing Scam Case (2018)
Background:
Cybercriminals tricked multiple Vodafone users into revealing their personal banking details through phishing messages and fraudulent emails.
Digital Evidence Used:
Email headers, IP tracking, and server logs to identify the source.
Bank transaction records linking victims’ accounts to unauthorized transfers.
Outcome:
The accused were convicted under Sections 66C, 66D of the IT Act and Sections 420 and 406 of the IPC.
Significance:
Demonstrated the necessity of integrating banking transaction records with digital forensics for financial cybercrime prosecution.
6. Bengaluru Crypto Fraud Case (2022)
Background:
A cryptocurrency platform was found to have defrauded investors of several crores through Ponzi schemes.
Digital Evidence Used:
Blockchain transaction records to trace flow of funds.
Emails, chat logs, and server data from the platform establishing the intent to defraud.
Outcome:
The founders were charged under IT Act Sections 66C, 66D, and IPC Section 420 for cheating.
Significance:
Illustrated the application of advanced digital evidence, including blockchain analytics, in prosecuting modern cyber-fraud.
Conclusion
Digital evidence plays a crucial role in cybercrime and online fraud prosecutions. From emails, social media accounts, and server logs to blockchain and banking records, properly collected digital evidence can establish intent, identity, and the sequence of events. Courts in India have increasingly relied on Sections 65A and 65B of the Indian Evidence Act along with the IT Act to admit electronic records. These cases collectively highlight the growing importance of digital forensics in ensuring convictions in cybercrime cases and protecting victims of online fraud.
RELATED Blog
0 comments