Illegal Arms Trade And Prosecutions Under Pakistani Law
🔹 Relevant Laws on Illegal Arms in Pakistan
1. Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965
This is the primary law that regulates arms possession and trade in Pakistan. It prohibits:
Possession of firearms without a valid license.
Manufacture or sale of arms without a proper license.
Import or export of arms without government approval.
2. Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 (ATA)
If arms are recovered in connection with terrorism, or with intent to spread fear or instability, the case may fall under the ATA, leading to harsher punishments.
3. Customs Act, 1969
Smuggling of arms across borders without declaration or permit is prosecuted under this law.
4. Pakistan Penal Code (PPC), 1860
Section 402 and other sections may be invoked where possession of arms is for the commission of dacoity, robbery, or other crimes.
🔹 Punishments
Under the Arms Ordinance, 1965:
Possession of an unlicensed firearm can lead to imprisonment up to 7 years and fine.
Possession of prohibited or automatic weapons can lead to life imprisonment.
Manufacturing or trafficking without a license can also lead to long-term imprisonment or life sentences.
🔹 Case Law Analysis: Illegal Arms Trade in Pakistan
1. Muhammad Rafique v. The State (PLD 2008 Lahore 457)
Facts:
The accused was arrested with a large cache of illegal weapons, including AK-47 rifles and ammunition.
He was charged under Section 13 of the Arms Ordinance, 1965.
Held:
The court emphasized the impact of such arms on public safety.
The accused was sentenced to 10 years imprisonment.
The court rejected the plea that the weapons were for personal safety due to the quantum of arms recovered.
Importance:
Reinforced that intent is irrelevant when the quantity and type of weapons imply a threat to public order.
2. Noor Muhammad v. The State (2010 SCMR 97)
Facts:
Noor Muhammad was apprehended during a police raid and was found in possession of prohibited bore weapons.
Claimed he found the weapons abandoned.
Held:
Supreme Court ruled that mere possession of such weapons constitutes a serious offense.
“Claiming ignorance” was not accepted due to the nature and seriousness of the crime.
Importance:
The case set a precedent that illegal possession itself is punishable, regardless of claimed ownership or intent.
3. Asghar Ali v. The State (2005 YLR 1814 Lahore)
Facts:
The accused was caught selling illegal weapons.
The prosecution produced a sting operation video as evidence.
Held:
The court admitted video evidence and emphasized that trade of arms, even on a small scale, constitutes a threat to national security.
Conviction was upheld.
Importance:
First time such electronic evidence was relied upon heavily in an illegal arms case.
4. State v. Saeed Khan (2013 P Cr. L J 452 Karachi)
Facts:
Saeed Khan was caught smuggling weapons from Balochistan to Karachi.
He was linked to militant outfits.
Held:
The court invoked Anti-Terrorism Act due to the cross-border smuggling and its impact on national security.
The accused was sentenced to life imprisonment.
Importance:
Expanded the scope of ATA in arms smuggling, showing that illegal arms trade can qualify as terrorism.
5. Muhammad Aslam v. The State (2006 SCMR 1610)
Facts:
Aslam was caught in a vehicle carrying a large number of unlicensed weapons.
He claimed he was merely the driver and unaware of the cargo.
Held:
The Supreme Court held that knowledge is not required for possession to be criminal.
If the accused had control or proximity, it amounts to possession.
Conviction upheld.
Importance:
Clarified constructive possession in illegal arms cases.
6. Federation of Pakistan v. Iqbal Baig (PLD 2012 SC 344)
Facts:
A high-profile arms smuggling ring was busted.
Iqbal Baig, a businessman, was found financing and transporting illegal weapons across provinces.
Held:
Supreme Court stressed the organized nature of the arms trade and the need for exemplary punishment.
Asset freezing and application of Anti-Money Laundering Act were also directed.
Importance:
Recognized the link between arms trade and financial crimes.
Showed how the state can proceed against financers, not just couriers.
7. The State v. Imran Shahzad (2021 MLD 740 Lahore)
Facts:
Police recovered foreign-made arms smuggled into Pakistan via Torkham border.
Forensic reports matched weapons with those used in sectarian killings.
Held:
The court allowed application of multiple laws: Arms Ordinance, ATA, and Customs Act.
The accused was given two concurrent life sentences.
Importance:
Emphasized the cumulative application of laws where arms trade is linked to terrorism and cross-border smuggling.
🔹 Conclusion
The illegal arms trade in Pakistan is prosecuted seriously under multiple laws, particularly the Arms Ordinance, 1965, ATA 1997, and occasionally Customs Act. Courts have consistently held that:
Mere possession is enough for prosecution.
Intent to use is not always necessary.
Involvement in arms trafficking leads to enhanced sentences, especially when linked to terrorism.
The above case laws:
Demonstrate strict judicial interpretation.
Show how technology and evidence (video, forensics) are increasingly accepted.
Indicate the growing trend to prosecute under terrorism and financial laws, not just arms law.
RELATED Blog
0 comments