Human Rights Violations During Investigations
π Common Human Rights Violations During Investigations
Custodial Torture: Physical or mental torture to extract confessions.
Illegal Detention/Arrest: Holding someone without proper legal process.
Denial of Legal Representation: Not allowing access to a lawyer.
Self-Incrimination and Forced Confessions: Coercing someone to confess.
Fake Encounters or Extrajudicial Killings: Killing suspects without due process.
Manipulation or Suppression of Evidence.
Violation of the Right to a Fair Trial.
π Detailed Case Law Analysis
1. D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal (India, 1997)
Citation: AIR 1997 SC 610
Facts:
D.K. Basu, a social activist, wrote a letter to the Chief Justice of India concerning custodial deaths. The Supreme Court treated it as a writ petition.
Issue:
Whether custodial torture and deaths are a violation of the right to life and how to prevent them.
Held:
The Court held that custodial torture is a clear violation of Article 21 of the Indian Constitution (Right to Life and Personal Liberty). It laid down detailed guidelines for arrest and detention, including:
Arrest memo to be prepared
Family of the arrestee to be informed
Medical examination every 48 hours
Police officers to wear visible identification
Arrestee's right to consult a lawyer
Significance:
This case became the benchmark for protecting human rights during arrest and detention in India.
2. Miranda v. Arizona (USA, 1966)
Citation: 384 U.S. 436
Facts:
Ernesto Miranda was arrested for kidnapping and rape. He confessed after two hours of interrogation but was not informed of his right to remain silent or to have a lawyer.
Issue:
Whether confessions obtained without informing the suspect of their constitutional rights are admissible.
Held:
The U.S. Supreme Court held that the confession was inadmissible as Miranda was not informed of his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination and Sixth Amendment right to counsel.
Significance:
Led to the creation of the "Miranda Warning" β police must inform suspects of:
Right to remain silent
Anything said can be used against them
Right to an attorney
This case transformed interrogation procedures in the U.S. and inspired similar protections globally.
3. Ireland v. United Kingdom (European Court of Human Rights, 1978)
Citation: ECHR, Application No. 5310/71
Facts:
During the conflict in Northern Ireland, the UK used βfive techniquesβ against detainees:
Wall-standing
Hooding
Noise bombardment
Sleep deprivation
Food and drink deprivation
Issue:
Whether these techniques amounted to torture or inhuman treatment under Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Held:
The European Court of Human Rights ruled that while these methods were inhuman and degrading treatment, they did not amount to torture.
Significance:
The case set international standards for what constitutes torture vs. inhuman treatment, and put pressure on democratic governments to revise their interrogation techniques.
4. Sheela Barse v. State of Maharashtra (India, 1983)
Citation: AIR 1983 SC 378
Facts:
Sheela Barse, a journalist, brought attention to the inhuman treatment of women prisoners in Maharashtra jails.
Issue:
Violation of women's rights in custody, especially regarding legal aid and mental health.
Held:
The Supreme Court held that legal aid must be provided to all prisoners, and especially vulnerable groups like women must be treated with dignity and care. Psychological assessment and regular monitoring were mandated.
Significance:
This case emphasized the right to legal aid, dignity, and humane treatment of women in custody. It also highlighted that mere incarceration does not strip an individual of fundamental rights.
5. Joginder Kumar v. State of U.P. (India, 1994)
Citation: (1994) 4 SCC 260
Facts:
Joginder Kumar was taken by the police for investigation and was not produced before a magistrate or formally arrested for several days.
Issue:
Whether police can detain a person for inquiry without arrest and violate constitutional safeguards.
Held:
The Supreme Court ruled that no arrest should be made merely because it is lawful, but only if it's necessary and justified. The arrested person must be informed of the reason and allowed to inform someone of their arrest.
Significance:
Set standards for just and fair arrests, reinforcing procedural safeguards against unlawful detention.
6. Sanchez-Llamas v. Oregon (USA, 2006)
Citation: 548 U.S. 331
Facts:
Foreign nationals were arrested in the U.S. without being informed of their right to consular access under the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations.
Issue:
Was their right under international law violated, and does it affect the admissibility of statements made during investigation?
Held:
While the U.S. acknowledged the Vienna Convention, the Supreme Court held that statements made without consular access were still admissible, but urged law enforcement to respect such rights.
Significance:
Highlighted the tension between domestic criminal procedure and international human rights obligations.
7. Tyburski v. Poland (ECHR, 2007)
Facts:
The applicant was held in pre-trial detention for an excessive period, over 5 years, without trial.
Held:
The European Court of Human Rights found this to be a violation of Article 5 (Right to Liberty) and Article 6 (Right to a fair and speedy trial) of the European Convention.
Significance:
Reinforced the principle that detention during investigation must not be arbitrary or unduly prolonged.
β Conclusion
These cases reflect how various courts β from national supreme courts to international tribunals β have consistently condemned human rights violations during investigations. The core principles reinforced are:
Due process must be followed.
No torture or cruel treatment, even to obtain evidence.
Arrested individuals have the right to be informed, represented, and treated with dignity.
Fair trial rights start from the moment of arrest, not just at trial.
Such case laws serve as precedents to protect individuals against the abuse of state power, and are essential for upholding the rule of law in democratic societies.
RELATED Blog
0 comments