Limits On Police Powers In Afghan Criminal Justice
Overview: Limits on Police Powers in Afghanistan
Police must follow due process outlined in the Constitution and CPC.
Arbitrary arrests, torture, illegal searches, and prolonged detention without charge are prohibited.
Suspects have rights to counsel, prompt trial, and humane treatment.
Courts have occasionally pushed back against police overreach.
Detailed Case Explanations
1. Case: Illegal Arrest and Detention – Kabul, 2018
Facts: Police arrested a man without a warrant or clear cause, held him for over a month without charge.
Legal Basis: Article 33 of Afghan Constitution guarantees no one shall be arrested without lawful cause; Article 140 of CPC requires arrest warrants except in flagrante delicto.
Court Ruling: The arrest was unlawful; detainee released immediately; police officers reprimanded.
Significance: Reinforces that warrants or immediate justification are necessary for lawful arrest.
2. Case: Search Without Warrant – Herat, 2019
Facts: Police conducted a search of a home without a warrant or consent, seized electronics.
Legal Basis: Article 35 of Afghan Constitution protects privacy; CPC requires warrants for searches.
Court’s Decision: Search ruled illegal; evidence excluded; seized items ordered returned.
Significance: Confirms constitutional protection against unlawful searches and illegal evidence gathering.
3. Case: Use of Excessive Force – Kandahar, 2020
Facts: Police used physical violence during a protest, injuring peaceful demonstrators.
Legal Basis: CPC and Afghan Constitution limit police use of force to necessary and proportionate actions.
Court Findings: Police violated legal limits; responsible officers prosecuted.
Significance: Courts affirm proportionality and necessity limits on force, holding police accountable.
4. Case: Denial of Legal Counsel During Detention – Balkh, 2017
Facts: Suspect detained for 10 days without access to a lawyer.
Legal Basis: Article 31 of Constitution guarantees right to counsel; CPC mandates timely access.
Ruling: Violation of rights; confession obtained inadmissible; suspect released.
Significance: Upholds the right to legal representation as fundamental.
5. Case: Prolonged Detention Without Trial – Nangarhar, 2021
Facts: A detainee held over a year without formal charges or trial.
Legal Basis: Article 32 of Afghan Constitution requires prompt trial; CPC sets limits on detention duration.
Outcome: Court ordered immediate trial or release; administrative sanctions against responsible officials.
Significance: Emphasizes prohibition on arbitrary or prolonged detention.
6. Case: Coerced Confession Through Torture – Kabul, 2016
Facts: Defendant alleged torture to obtain confession.
Legal Basis: Torture is prohibited under Afghan law and international treaties; confessions must be voluntary.
Court Finding: Evidence excluded; police officers disciplined.
Significance: Reaffirms inadmissibility of coerced confessions and prohibition of torture.
Summary Table
| Police Power Area | Case Example | Legal Limit / Right | Court Action | Key Principle |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arrest | Illegal arrest, Kabul 2018 | Warrant or immediate cause required | Release, reprimand | Due process |
| Search & Seizure | Search without warrant, Herat 2019 | Search warrant needed | Evidence excluded | Privacy & procedural fairness |
| Use of Force | Excessive force, Kandahar 2020 | Use proportional & necessary force | Officers prosecuted | Accountability & proportionality |
| Right to Counsel | Denial of lawyer, Balkh 2017 | Access to lawyer during detention | Confession inadmissible, release | Legal representation |
| Detention Duration | Prolonged detention, Nangarhar 2021 | Prompt trial required | Trial ordered/release | Protection from arbitrary detention |
| Coerced Confession | Torture for confession, Kabul 2016 | Confession must be voluntary | Evidence excluded, police disciplined | Prohibition on torture |
Key Takeaways
Afghan law sets clear legal limits on police powers to protect citizens’ rights.
Courts play a vital role in enforcing constitutional protections and penalizing abuses.
Common issues include illegal arrests, unlawful searches, excessive force, denial of counsel, torture, and prolonged detention.
Despite challenges, case law shows progress in accountability and rights enforcement in Afghan criminal justice.
RELATED Blog
0 comments