Effectiveness Of Victim Protection Programs
Victim protection programs are mechanisms designed to ensure the safety, dignity, and rights of victims during criminal justice processes. They aim to:
Protect victims from intimidation or harassment
Ensure participation in judicial proceedings
Provide compensation and rehabilitation
Safeguard vulnerable witnesses, including women, children, and victims of terrorism
Legal Framework in India
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973
Section 53A: Medical examination of rape victims
Section 304B: Dowry-related death provisions
Sections 228A, 228B: Protection of identity of sexual assault victims
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012
Section 19: Protection of child victims and witnesses
Section 33: Special courts for speedy trial
Victim Compensation Schemes
Section 357A, CrPC: State compensation to victims
Compensation for terrorism victims under Nirbhaya Fund, National Disaster Response Fund
Witness Protection Programs (WPP)
Not fully codified in India yet; partially implemented through NIA, CBI, and state-level protocols
Case Laws on Victim Protection Programs
1. Lilu v. State of Haryana (2002) – Protection of Women Victims
Facts:
A woman victim of sexual harassment faced threats from the accused and their associates during trial.
Court Observations:
Court directed police to provide personal security and restrain intimidation.
Emphasized the victim’s right to dignity and safety under Articles 21 and 14 of the Constitution.
Effectiveness:
Ensured victim could testify safely.
Highlighted judicial support as a core component of victim protection.
2. Ranjan Ghosh v. State of West Bengal (2010) – Child Victim Protection
Facts:
Child victims of sexual abuse were hesitant to testify due to threats from the accused.
Court’s Actions:
Directed trial under POCSO Act with in-camera proceedings.
Allowed the child to depose through video conferencing to reduce trauma.
Significance:
Reinforced that special procedures reduce psychological harm and improve participation.
Effective victim protection program ensures testimony is recorded without exposing children to danger.
3. State of Maharashtra v. Mohd. Yakub (2003) – Terrorism Victim Compensation
Facts:
Victims of serial bomb blasts in Mumbai claimed monetary compensation from the State.
Court Ruling:
Awarded monetary relief under Section 357A CrPC.
Observed that compensation should cover medical, psychological, and livelihood loss.
Effectiveness:
Demonstrated the practical utility of victim compensation programs in disaster and terrorism-related cases.
Helped restore some dignity and support for victims.
4. Zahira Habibullah Sheikh v. State of Gujarat (2004) – Witness Protection in Communal Violence
Facts:
Victim and witnesses in Gujarat riots were threatened and witnesses turned hostile.
Court Orders:
Ordered transfer of trial outside the state to ensure safety.
Directed police protection for victim families.
Significance:
Shows that relocation and state protection are effective tools.
Judicial intervention reinforced the importance of safety to secure justice.
5. Selvi v. State of Karnataka (2010) – Psychological Protection
Facts:
Victims of sexual assault faced coercion and societal pressure.
Court Observations:
Ordered counselling and psychological support before, during, and after trial.
Recognized that mental well-being of victims is crucial for justice delivery.
Effectiveness:
Programmatic support reduces trauma and ensures effective participation in proceedings.
6. Rudul Sah v. State of Bihar (1983) – Compensation as Protection
Facts:
Rudul Sah was illegally detained for 14 years after acquittal.
Judgment:
Supreme Court awarded monetary compensation for wrongful detention.
Recognized compensation as a form of protection against further injustice.
Significance:
Expanded the concept of victim protection to include redressal and restitution.
Effective in preventing future psychological and material harm.
7. Mukesh & Others – Nirbhaya Case (2012) – Comprehensive Victim Protection
Facts:
Victim of brutal gang rape and murder received support for medical care, legal aid, and public compensation.
Court Actions:
Court directed fast-track trial.
Victim’s family given financial and medical assistance under victim compensation schemes.
Significance:
Demonstrates multi-dimensional protection: legal, financial, psychological.
Shows increased effectiveness of coordinated victim protection programs.
Evaluation of Effectiveness
Strengths
Victim compensation programs provide financial relief and psychological support.
Witness protection and special court procedures reduce fear and intimidation.
In-camera trials and video testimony enhance participation of vulnerable victims.
Judicial directives strengthen state accountability for victim safety.
Limitations
Witness Protection Program in India is not fully codified nationwide.
Implementation varies across states; rural victims often left unprotected.
Compensation is often delayed or inadequate, limiting effectiveness.
Societal stigma and familial pressure can undermine protection programs.
Conclusion
Victim protection programs in India—ranging from legal safeguards, special procedures, compensation schemes, and counseling services—have proven effective in ensuring participation, dignity, and safety.
Judicial intervention has been critical in cases like Zahira Habibullah Sheikh, Rudul Sah, and Nirbhaya.
Programs are most effective when multi-dimensional, combining legal, financial, and psychological support.
There is room for national codification of witness protection and faster compensation delivery.
RELATED Blog
comments