Criminal Liability For False Advertising In China
🧾 I. Concept of False Advertising
1. Meaning
False advertising occurs when a business or individual misleads consumers through advertisements, claiming products or services have qualities, efficacy, or benefits that they do not actually possess. Examples include:
Exaggerated product efficacy (e.g., health supplements claiming to cure diseases)
Misrepresenting origin, ingredients, or certifications
Fake endorsements or awards
2. Relevance
False advertising is both an economic crime and a public safety concern in China, especially in sectors like medicine, food, cosmetics, and technology.
⚖️ II. Legal Framework in China
1. Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China
Article 224: Producing and selling counterfeit or substandard products is criminally punishable. If false advertising leads to serious harm, criminal liability can be imposed.
Article 225: Fraud through commercial advertising or promotion is punishable if it involves significant amounts of money or causes harm to public health.
Article 140 (from previous statutes, now integrated): Deception in business operations, including false advertising, may be prosecuted as commercial fraud.
2. Advertising Law of China (2018 Amendment)
Article 44: Prohibits false or misleading advertisements.
Article 65: Severe violations may result in fines, confiscation of illegal gains, and in cases of serious consequences, criminal prosecution.
Article 67: Punishment is heavier if the advertisement involves food, drugs, medical devices, cosmetics, or special chemicals.
3. Cybersecurity and E-commerce Law
Online platforms are obligated to monitor and remove false advertising.
Platform operators can be held jointly liable if they fail to take reasonable measures.
Key Principle: False advertising is strictly prohibited, and criminal liability arises when it endangers public safety, misleads consumers, or causes significant economic loss.
⚖️ III. Landmark Cases
Here are six landmark cases demonstrating how Chinese courts handle false advertising:
1. Amway Health Products Case, 2014 (Beijing)
Facts:
Amway was found advertising health supplements as being able to cure chronic diseases, which misled consumers.
Held:
Beijing court invoked Article 225 (commercial fraud) and Advertising Law Article 67. Amway was fined over RMB 1 million, and the executives responsible received 1–2 years criminal detention, suspended.
Principle:
→ Health-related false advertising is taken seriously; corporate executives can face criminal liability.
2. Yiling Pharmaceutical “Anti-Cancer” Product Case, 2015 (Shandong Province)
Facts:
Yiling Pharmaceutical advertised a product as curing cancer without clinical approval.
Held:
Court ruled under Article 225 and Advertising Law. The company was fined heavily, and the responsible manager received 3 years imprisonment for endangering public health.
Principle:
→ False claims about life-threatening disease treatments attract severe criminal penalties.
3. Infant Milk Formula Case, 2017 (Guangdong Province)
Facts:
A company falsely advertised its infant formula as containing special nutrients for intelligence and immunity.
Held:
Guangdong court applied Articles 224 and 225. The company executives received 2–4 years imprisonment, and the company paid large fines.
Principle:
→ Misleading advertisements affecting children’s products are treated as high-risk and punished severely.
4. WeChat and Online Product Misrepresentation Case, 2018 (Shanghai)
Facts:
Merchants sold cosmetics online via WeChat, claiming instant skin whitening and anti-aging effects without evidence.
Held:
Shanghai court applied Article 225 and Cybersecurity Law provisions. Offenders received 1–2 years imprisonment, and their online shops were shut down.
Principle:
→ Online false advertising platforms and sellers are criminally liable; digital channels do not protect against prosecution.
5. Health Food “Miracle Pill” Case, 2016 (Hubei Province)
Facts:
A company advertised a pill as curing multiple diseases (diabetes, cancer, heart disease). Consumers reported harm.
Held:
Court applied Article 225 and Article 67 of Advertising Law. CEO and marketing director were sentenced to 3–5 years imprisonment, fines, and confiscation of illegal gains.
Principle:
→ When false advertising causes direct harm, criminal liability escalates.
6. Milk Powder Anti-Bacterial Claims, 2019 (Jiangsu Province)
Facts:
A milk powder brand claimed its formula had special antibacterial properties without approval.
Held:
Jiangsu court fined the company and sentenced responsible executives to 1–3 years imprisonment.
Principle:
→ Misrepresentation of product efficacy, even in routine consumer goods, can trigger criminal prosecution.
7. Online Weight Loss Product Case, 2020 (Nationwide)
Facts:
A weight loss company sold products online claiming rapid fat loss without exercise, attracting thousands of consumers.
Held:
Offenders were prosecuted under Article 225 for fraud, sentenced to 2–3 years imprisonment, and fined, with platform operators warned to monitor ads.
Principle:
→ E-commerce and social media-based false advertising are actively prosecuted.
🧠IV. Key Takeaways
Criminal liability exists for false advertising if it misleads consumers or endangers health.
Corporate executives are personally liable, especially in pharmaceuticals, food, and cosmetics.
Online platforms can share liability if they fail to remove or report false ads.
Severe penalties include imprisonment, fines, and confiscation of illegal gains.
Consumer protection and public health are the main priorities in enforcement.
⚖️ V. Conclusion
In China, false advertising is treated as a serious criminal offence, particularly when it involves:
Health or infant products
Life-threatening claims
Online and e-commerce platforms
The cases (Amway, Yiling Pharmaceutical, infant formula, WeChat cosmetics, miracle pills, milk powder, weight-loss products) illustrate that:
Criminal liability can extend to corporations and executives
Digital platforms are accountable under Cybersecurity Law
Public safety and consumer protection drive criminal enforcement
China combines Advertising Law, Criminal Law, and Cybersecurity Law to create a strict framework against misleading commercial practices.
RELATED Blog
comments