Indigenous Law And Criminal Justice
Indigenous Law and Criminal Justice in Canada
Canada’s criminal justice system has historically been based on Western legal principles. However, Indigenous peoples have distinct legal traditions, often referred to as Indigenous law or customary law, which emphasize restorative justice, community healing, and reconciliation.
The interaction between Indigenous law and the Canadian criminal justice system is especially relevant due to the overrepresentation of Indigenous people in the justice system and legislative efforts to incorporate restorative justice principles.
Key legal frameworks include:
The Canadian Criminal Code, which applies to all.
Gladue principles, codified in s. 718.2(e) of the Criminal Code, which require courts to consider the unique circumstances of Indigenous offenders during sentencing.
Restorative justice programs, including healing circles, sentencing circles, and diversion programs.
Key Principles of Indigenous Criminal Justice in Canada
Restorative Justice Approach:
Focuses on repairing harm rather than purely punishing the offender. Victims, offenders, and the community participate in the resolution.
Cultural Context in Sentencing:
Courts must consider historical trauma, colonization, residential school experiences, and systemic discrimination when sentencing Indigenous offenders.
Sentencing Circles and Healing Circles:
Community members and Elders play a role in determining appropriate sentences.
Designed to promote accountability, reconciliation, and rehabilitation.
Gladue Reports:
Detailed pre-sentencing reports on the Indigenous offender’s personal, social, and community background.
Aim to reduce reliance on incarceration and incorporate restorative measures.
Leading Canadian Cases on Indigenous Law and Criminal Justice
Below are seven landmark cases illustrating how Canadian courts incorporate Indigenous law and principles into criminal justice:
1. R. v. Gladue, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 688
Topic: Sentencing of Indigenous Offenders
Facts:
Jamie Gladue, an Indigenous woman, pleaded guilty to manslaughter for killing her common-law husband.
She faced sentencing under standard criminal law.
Legal Principle:
The Supreme Court ruled that s. 718.2(e) of the Criminal Code requires courts to consider the unique systemic and background factors affecting Indigenous offenders.
Sentencing should emphasize restorative justice alternatives and community-based sanctions where appropriate.
Impact:
Established the “Gladue principle”, which is foundational in all sentencing of Indigenous offenders in Canada.
2. R. v. Ipeelee, 2012 SCC 13
Topic: Reinforcement of Gladue Principles
Facts:
Two Indigenous offenders argued that courts failed to properly consider Gladue factors during sentencing for serious offences.
Legal Principle:
The Supreme Court confirmed that Gladue principles apply to all sentences, not just non-violent offences.
Courts must actively consider:
Indigenous heritage
Effects of colonization and residential schools
Systemic discrimination
Community and cultural context
Impact:
Strengthened the application of Gladue principles in Canadian sentencing, including violent offences.
Emphasized that courts must go beyond perfunctory acknowledgment and genuinely integrate Indigenous circumstances into sentencing.
3. R. v. Wells, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 782
Topic: Indigenous Justice and Sentencing Circles
Facts:
Wells, an Indigenous man, was convicted of assault. His community advocated for a sentencing circle.
Legal Principle:
The Supreme Court recognized sentencing circles as legitimate alternatives under the Canadian Criminal Code.
Courts may incorporate community participation in determining appropriate restorative sanctions.
Impact:
Set a precedent for integrating Indigenous community-based justice practices into formal criminal sentencing.
4. R. v. Lavallee, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 852
Topic: Cultural Context in Self-Defence Claims
Facts:
Angelique Lavallee, an Indigenous woman, killed her abusive partner.
Legal Principle:
Court recognized Battered Woman Syndrome within the context of Indigenous women’s experiences.
Cultural and social background can influence perception of threat and reasonableness of actions.
Impact:
Although not strictly a Gladue case, it highlighted the importance of considering Indigenous social and cultural context in criminal proceedings.
5. R. v. Sinclair, 2010 SCC 35
Topic: Indigenous Youth and Legal Rights
Facts:
Sinclair, a 16-year-old Indigenous youth, was questioned by police without fully understanding his rights.
Legal Principle:
Emphasized that youth and Indigenous offenders require additional protections due to vulnerability and systemic disadvantage.
Police and courts must consider cultural and social background in assessing procedural fairness.
Impact:
Reinforced the intersection of youth justice principles and Indigenous justice in Canada.
6. R. v. H.C., 2009 ABCA 21
Topic: Gladue Reports and Community Context
Facts:
H.C., an Indigenous offender, received a sentence for theft and assault. His Gladue report documented residential school trauma and substance abuse.
Legal Principle:
Courts emphasized the importance of detailed Gladue reports in determining alternatives to incarceration.
Sentencing should address root causes of criminal behaviour, not just the offence itself.
Impact:
Highlighted practical implementation of restorative justice in sentencing Indigenous offenders.
7. R. v. I.C., 2016 ONSC 2456
Topic: Indigenous Restorative Justice Programs
Facts:
I.C., an Indigenous youth, participated in a healing circle after committing a property offence.
Legal Principle:
Court recognized restorative justice programs as valid alternatives to formal court proceedings.
Involvement of Elders, victims, and community members can reduce recidivism and support rehabilitation.
Impact:
Demonstrated the practical application of Indigenous justice traditions within the Canadian legal system.
Summary of Key Principles from Cases
| Case | Key Principle |
|---|---|
| R. v. Gladue | Courts must consider Indigenous circumstances in sentencing. |
| R. v. Ipeelee | Gladue principles apply to all offences, including violent ones. |
| R. v. Wells | Sentencing circles and community-based sanctions are legitimate. |
| R. v. Lavallee | Cultural/social context is relevant in assessing self-defence and culpability. |
| R. v. Sinclair | Indigenous youth require additional procedural protections. |
| R. v. H.C. | Gladue reports are essential for sentencing that addresses root causes. |
| R. v. I.C. | Restorative justice programs can replace formal court proceedings. |
Conclusion
The integration of Indigenous law into Canada’s criminal justice system emphasizes:
Restorative justice, rather than punitive incarceration
Cultural and historical context in sentencing
Community involvement and healing
The transformative potential of Gladue reports and sentencing circles
Indigenous legal traditions continue to reshape Canadian criminal justice, addressing overrepresentation, systemic discrimination, and intergenerational trauma.
RELATED Blog
comments