Sex Trafficking Prosecutions In Federal Courts
⚖️ Sex Trafficking Prosecutions in Federal Courts: Overview
🔹 Legal Foundation
Sex trafficking is prosecuted primarily under federal law—most notably:
18 U.S.C. § 1591 – Sex trafficking of children or by force, fraud, or coercion.
18 U.S.C. § 2421–2423 – Mann Act statutes (interstate transport for prostitution or sexual activity).
RICO (18 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq.) – In some cases where trafficking is tied to organized crime.
🔹 What Prosecutors Must Prove Under 18 U.S.C. § 1591:
To convict someone of sex trafficking, the prosecution must prove:
The defendant knowingly recruited, enticed, harbored, transported, provided, obtained, or maintained a person;
That this was done for the purpose of a commercial sex act;
And either:
The person was under 18 years old; or
The act was induced by force, fraud, or coercion.
The law imposes strict liability when the victim is under 18—even if the trafficker didn’t know the age.
📚 Detailed Case Law Examples (6 Cases)
1. United States v. Marcus (2010, U.S. Supreme Court)
Facts:
Glenn Marcus ran a sex-based website and engaged in sex trafficking by forcing women into BDSM-based sexual acts.
He was convicted under federal sex trafficking laws.
Marcus appealed on the grounds that some acts occurred before § 1591 was enacted.
Holding:
The Supreme Court ruled that prosecution could not retroactively apply § 1591 to acts before it became law, but upheld other charges.
Significance:
Clarified the limits of applying trafficking laws retroactively.
Reinforced the distinction between consensual BDSM and coerced sexual labor.
2. United States v. Jungers (8th Cir. 2013)
Facts:
Two men were arrested in South Dakota for attempting to buy sex from minors during a sting operation.
Prosecuted under § 1591 as “buyers” in a sex trafficking scheme.
Holding:
The 8th Circuit ruled that buyers of sex acts with minors can be prosecuted under § 1591, not just traffickers or pimps.
Significance:
Broadened liability under federal law to include sex buyers, not just those trafficking others.
Set precedent used in many future prosecutions.
3. United States v. Robinson (6th Cir. 2017)
Facts:
Defendant trafficked young women across state lines, used drugs, threats, and isolation to force them into prostitution.
Claimed the women were willing participants.
Holding:
Convicted under § 1591 based on use of coercion and psychological control, even without physical violence.
Significance:
Important case affirming that psychological coercion qualifies as “coercion” under the statute.
Strengthened prosecutors’ ability to target traffickers who use manipulation instead of overt violence.
4. United States v. Rivera (S.D. Fla. 2019)
Facts:
Rivera operated a brothel and recruited underage girls through promises of modeling jobs.
Girls were forced to engage in commercial sex, threatened with exposure or violence.
Holding:
Convicted on multiple counts under § 1591, including trafficking minors and conspiracy.
Court enhanced sentencing due to the vulnerability of the victims and organized structure of the crime.
Significance:
Demonstrated how fraud (fake job offers) constitutes a form of coercion under the law.
Shows how conspiracy and organized crime enhancements increase penalties.
5. United States v. Alaboudi (10th Cir. 2021)
Facts:
Alaboudi ran a massage parlor in Colorado where women were brought from abroad under false promises and forced into sex work.
Used threats of immigration consequences and financial debt.
Holding:
Convicted under sex trafficking laws and sentenced to over 20 years.
Court accepted immigration-related threats as a form of coercion.
Significance:
Set important precedent for cases involving foreign nationals and immigration-related coercion.
Reinforced that trafficking doesn't need to involve physical violence—threats and manipulation are enough.
6. United States v. Paris (D. Conn. 2007)
Facts:
Dennis Paris was a pimp who trafficked multiple young women, including minors.
Used beatings, threats, drug dependency, and forced abortion to maintain control.
Holding:
Convicted under § 1591 for trafficking and conspiracy.
Judge ruled that both minors and adult women subjected to coercion were protected under the statute.
Significance:
Helped define “force, fraud, or coercion” broadly.
One of the earliest large-scale sex trafficking convictions under modern federal law.
⚖️ Key Legal Takeaways
| Legal Element | How Courts Interpret It |
|---|---|
| "Coercion" | Includes threats, psychological manipulation, debt, immigration pressure, etc. |
| "Knowingly" | Knowledge of the act itself—not always the victim's age |
| Victim under 18 | Strict liability—consent or mistake about age is NOT a defense |
| Interstate activity | Triggered easily—moving victims across state lines or using hotels, phones, internet |
| Buyers of sex acts | Can be charged as traffickers if they engage with minors |
✅ Summary
Federal sex trafficking prosecutions under 18 U.S.C. § 1591 are aggressive, complex, and broadly interpreted to protect victims. Courts have consistently ruled that:
Consent is not a defense when the victim is a minor or coerced.
Non-physical coercion (psychological, financial, immigration-based) is sufficient.
Buyers of sex with minors can be prosecuted under trafficking statutes.
Strict liability applies in many cases involving minors.
RELATED Blog
0 comments