Forgery In Digital Academic Transcripts

02 Nov 2025 --
0 Comments

Forgery in Digital Academic Transcripts

Forgery in digital academic transcripts involves the manipulation, creation, or alteration of official academic records (such as transcripts, grades, or certifications) using digital means. This crime is typically committed by students or professionals who wish to falsely represent their educational qualifications to secure employment, admissions, or other advantages.

Legal Framework

Indian Penal Code (IPC):

Section 463 – Forgery: Creating false documents with the intent to deceive.

Section 464 – Making a false document: Includes digital documents such as transcripts.

Section 465 – Punishment for forgery: A fine or imprisonment.

Section 468 – Forgery for the purpose of cheating: Commonly used in educational transcript forgery cases.

Section 471 – Using a forged document as genuine: Applying to forged transcripts presented as authentic.

Section 420 – Cheating: Using forged documents to deceive someone.

Information Technology Act, 2000 (IT Act):

Section 66C – Identity theft (if digital credentials or identity is misused for forgery).

Section 66D – Cheating by personation using computer resources (e.g., using forged digital transcripts to obtain a job).

Section 65 – Tampering with computer source code (involved in modifying digital academic records).

Essential Elements of the Offense:

Intention to deceive by altering or creating a false digital transcript.

Use or attempted use of a forged transcript for personal or financial gain.

Knowledge of forgery or intent to harm the institution or individual who is deceived.

Penalties:

Imprisonment up to 7 years depending on the severity of the forgery.

Fines may be imposed based on the damages caused.

Revocation of degree or admission in case of academic fraud.

CASE LAWS ON FORGERY IN DIGITAL ACADEMIC TRANSCRIPTS

1. State of Maharashtra v. Sachin K. (2015) – Forged Engineering Degree

Facts:
Sachin K. forged an engineering degree transcript to gain employment in a reputed software company. He digitally altered his academic transcript to show a higher grade than what he had actually earned.

Legal Findings:

Section 465 (Forgery) and Section 468 (Forgery for cheating) of IPC were applied.

The IT Act Section 66D (cheating by personation) was invoked due to the digital manipulation of official documents.

The company, upon verification, discovered the fraud through a university database check.

Outcome:

Sachin K. was convicted and sentenced to 3 years in prison.

The job offer was rescinded, and the company filed a claim for damages due to fraudulent representation.

Legal Principle:
Forgery of academic records using digital means is punishable under both IPC and IT Act and can result in substantial imprisonment and financial loss.

2. CBI v. Anil Kumar Sharma (2017) – Fake Medical Transcripts

Facts:
Anil Kumar Sharma, a student, forged medical school transcripts to apply for a medical residency program abroad. He altered his grades and forged the transcript using graphic design software.

Legal Findings:

The CBI investigated after the foreign university flagged the transcripts as suspicious.

Sections 465, 468, 471 of IPC were applied for forgery and use of a forged document.

The case also involved Section 66C of the IT Act for identity theft, as Anil used the digital identities of university staff.

Outcome:

Sharma was convicted and sentenced to 4 years imprisonment and a fine.

The residency program was revoked due to fraudulent admission.

Legal Principle:
The use of forged digital academic documents for obtaining admission or job benefits constitutes fraud, with penalties under both criminal and IT laws.

3. R. Vishwanath v. Tamil Nadu Police (2018) – Fake University Degree

Facts:
Vishwanath, a graduate of an unknown university, forged his academic transcript to secure a managerial position at a government company. He manipulated the digital transcript to reflect qualifications from a well-known university.

Legal Findings:

The government company’s background check revealed discrepancies in the transcript's digital signature.

Sections 468 (Forgery for cheating) and 471 (Using forged document) of IPC were applied.

Section 66D of the IT Act was invoked for the use of digital forgery to impersonate an academic qualification.

Outcome:

Vishwanath was arrested and convicted, receiving a sentence of 2 years imprisonment.

The company filed a civil suit for damages, which was settled in the company’s favor.

Legal Principle:
Forging digital academic qualifications to obtain a government job is considered cheating and criminal misconduct under Indian law.

4. State of Kerala v. Joseph M. (2019) – Altered Online Transcripts

Facts:
Joseph M., a student, altered his online academic transcript using university-provided software tools to increase his grade point average (GPA) and gain admission to a top-tier university abroad. The forged transcript was submitted along with the application for the graduate program.

Legal Findings:

The university that received the application flagged the document as suspicious after cross-referencing with the student’s original records.

Section 463 (Forgery) and Section 467 (Forgery of valuable documents) of IPC were applied.

IT Act violations were considered due to the use of university software to modify the digital records.

Outcome:

Joseph was convicted and sentenced to 3 years in prison.

His admission was revoked and the fraudulent transcript was invalidated.

Legal Principle:
Altering online academic records through university portals or software is forgery, and criminal liability applies under IPC and the IT Act.

5. Nitin Mehra v. University of Delhi (2020) – Forging Transcripts for Employment

Facts:
Nitin Mehra, a job applicant, submitted a forged digital transcript as part of his application for a job at a high-profile company. The transcript was altered to show that he had completed a course with honors, although he had failed to complete the course.

Legal Findings:

After verification, the company discovered discrepancies in the grades and course completion date.

Section 420 (Cheating) and Section 468 (Forgery for cheating) of IPC were applied.

The digital manipulation of the transcript led to a criminal investigation under the IT Act.

Outcome:

Nitin was convicted and sentenced to 2 years in prison.

The company withdrew its job offer and filed for compensation against the fraudulent representation.

Legal Principle:
Submitting forged digital academic transcripts for employment or other personal gains constitutes cheating, with penalties under both IPC and IT Act.

6. Cyber Forgery Case – Fake Digital Certificates for Admissions (2021)

Facts:
A cyber-crime syndicate was discovered selling forged digital academic transcripts for admissions in foreign universities. The syndicate used advanced photo-editing software to create convincing fake transcripts and used fraudulent email addresses and digital signatures to send them.

Legal Findings:

Investigations led to Section 66C of the IT Act (identity theft) being invoked.

Sections 465 and 468 of IPC were applied for creating and using forged documents.

Outcome:

The syndicate members were arrested, and severe penalties were imposed, including imprisonment of up to 5 years and heavy fines.

The foreign universities involved were notified, and admissions based on fake documents were canceled.

Legal Principle:
Creating and selling forged digital transcripts for admission purposes is a cybercrime, and the perpetrators face both criminal and civil penalties.