Pipeline Leak Concealment Criminal Prosecutions
1. Enbridge – Line 6B Kalamazoo River Spill (2010)
Facts: On July 25, 2010, Enbridge’s Line 6B pipeline ruptured near Marshall, Michigan, spilling tens of thousands of barrels of crude oil (diluted bitumen) into Talmadge Creek and the Kalamazoo River. Enbridge attempted restarts after the rupture, which caused additional oil to leak.
Charges: Federal authorities pursued criminal charges under the Clean Water Act (CWA) for unlawful discharge and failure to report the spill promptly.
Outcome: Enbridge paid approximately $177 million in combined federal and state penalties, including fines and mandatory environmental restoration.
Significance: This case showed that deliberately ignoring a pipeline failure, or delaying reporting, can result in serious criminal liability in addition to civil penalties.
2. Plains All American – Refugio Beach Spill, California (2015)
Facts: In May 2015, a Plains All American pipeline ruptured near Refugio State Beach, releasing tens of thousands of gallons of crude oil into the ocean. Evidence suggested delayed reporting and inadequate immediate response.
Charges: California prosecutors filed felony and misdemeanor charges for illegal discharge of oil and violations of environmental protection laws, emphasizing the delayed notification to authorities.
Outcome: The company faced criminal convictions, large civil settlements, and paid millions for cleanup and restoration.
Significance: Demonstrated that delayed reporting and concealment can lead to felony charges at the state level, not just civil penalties.
3. ExxonMobil – Pegasus Pipeline, Mayflower, Arkansas (2013)
Facts: The Pegasus pipeline ruptured in Mayflower, Arkansas, releasing crude oil into residential areas. Although ExxonMobil reported the spill, there were allegations of insufficient response measures.
Charges: Federal Clean Water Act violations and pipeline safety law violations.
Outcome: ExxonMobil entered consent decrees requiring remediation, civil penalties, and operational reforms. No criminal conviction occurred, but federal scrutiny was severe.
Significance: Shows that even timely reporting may not prevent enforcement if response protocols are inadequate, and criminal charges can follow if willful concealment is involved.
4. Southern California Gas Company – Aliso Canyon Methane Leak (2015)
Facts: A natural gas storage well at Aliso Canyon, California, leaked methane for months, causing public health hazards and mass evacuations. Allegations included delayed reporting and underestimation of the leak.
Charges: State and local prosecutors pursued criminal negligence and failure-to-report violations, alongside civil enforcement for environmental and public health damage.
Outcome: Multi-million-dollar civil settlements, regulatory penalties, and mandated operational reforms. Criminal charges highlighted accountability for delayed reporting.
Significance: Even in non-pipeline but related industrial leaks, concealment or delayed reporting triggers criminal exposure.
5. Shell Pipeline – Falcon Pipeline, Pennsylvania (2024)
Facts: During Falcon Pipeline construction, reports indicated spills (drilling mud and industrial liquids) were under-reported to regulators to avoid regulatory scrutiny and potential costs.
Charges: State misdemeanor charges for failure to report spills and false reporting under Pennsylvania environmental law.
Outcome: Criminal charges were filed; the case illustrates the growing focus on under-reporting even during construction and not just after catastrophic ruptures.
Significance: Prosecutors will pursue concealment or incomplete reporting even for non-operational activities, emphasizing legal obligations to regulators.
6. SFPP / Kinder Morgan – Walnut Creek Gasoline Spill (2020)
Facts: Gasoline leaked from an underground pipeline in Walnut Creek, California. Authorities alleged the company delayed reporting the spill and provided incomplete information to regulators.
Charges: State misdemeanor charges for failing to make timely and accurate reports to authorities.
Outcome: SFPP entered settlements with regulatory agencies, paid fines, and implemented mandated monitoring and leak detection improvements.
Significance: Highlights that late or incomplete reporting alone can result in criminal liability, and settlements often include operational reforms beyond financial penalties.
Key Takeaways Across Cases
Immediate and accurate reporting is essential. Delays or concealment trigger criminal liability.
Operational negligence compounds liability. Restarting pipelines, falsifying records, or ignoring integrity programs can result in felony charges.
Civil and criminal penalties often go together. Companies frequently pay fines, fund environmental restoration, and implement strict compliance measures.
Even construction leaks are scrutinized. Under-reporting during non-operational phases can attract criminal charges.
0 comments