Consumer Protection Criminal Cases
Overview: Consumer Protection Criminal Cases
Consumer protection laws aim to safeguard buyers from unfair, deceptive, or fraudulent business practices. Violations can include:
False advertising
Selling defective or unsafe products
Fraudulent marketing
Price gouging
Deceptive billing practices
Criminal liability arises when actions are willful or reckless, causing harm to consumers or the public.
Key Consumer Protection Criminal Cases
1. United States v. Volkswagen AG (Diesel Emissions Scandal, 2017)
Facts
Volkswagen installed “defeat devices” in diesel cars that manipulated emissions tests, making cars appear cleaner than they were.
Charges
Conspiracy to defraud the U.S.
False statements
Obstruction of justice
Outcome
VW pleaded guilty.
Paid over $2.8 billion in criminal fines and penalties.
Senior executives faced investigations, though few criminal convictions.
Significance
Exposed corporate fraud affecting millions of consumers worldwide.
Strengthened enforcement of consumer safety and environmental regulations.
2. United States v. Theranos (Elizabeth Holmes and Ramesh “Sunny” Balwani, 2018)
Facts
Theranos marketed a blood-testing device that was inaccurate and unreliable, misleading consumers and investors.
Charges
Wire fraud
Conspiracy to commit fraud
Outcome
Elizabeth Holmes convicted in 2022 of multiple counts of fraud.
Balwani also convicted in related proceedings.
Significance
Landmark case on startup fraud harming consumers’ health and safety.
Reinforced criminal accountability in health tech marketing.
3. United States v. Purdue Pharma (Opioid Crisis, 2020)
Facts
Purdue Pharma aggressively marketed OxyContin while downplaying addiction risks, fueling the opioid epidemic.
Charges
Misbranding drugs under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA)
Fraud
Outcome
Purdue Pharma pleaded guilty to criminal charges.
Paid $4.5 billion in settlements, including criminal fines.
Company filed for bankruptcy.
Significance
Highlighted pharmaceutical companies’ role in public health crises.
Showed limits of corporate immunity in consumer harm cases.
4. United States v. Samsung Electronics (Galaxy Note 7 Battery Fires, 2017)
Facts
Samsung continued to sell the Galaxy Note 7 smartphones despite known battery defects that caused fires and injuries.
Charges
Criminal negligence (in some jurisdictions)
False advertising (civil)
Outcome
Faced regulatory fines and product recalls globally.
No criminal convictions in the U.S., but class-action lawsuits followed.
Significance
Raised corporate accountability for product safety.
Increased scrutiny on product testing and consumer warnings.
5. United States v. Johnson & Johnson (Talcum Powder Litigation, 2021)
Facts
Johnson & Johnson allegedly hid evidence about asbestos contamination in talc-based products causing cancer.
Charges
Fraud
Consumer deception
Outcome
Multiple civil verdicts against J&J; criminal investigations ongoing.
Several executives scrutinized for potential misconduct.
Significance
Demonstrates ongoing criminal exposure related to product safety and consumer deception.
Influenced regulatory and legal approaches to consumer health products.
6. United States v. Volkswagen Clean Air Act Violation (Dieselgate, 2016)
Facts
In addition to consumer fraud, VW was charged with violating the Clean Air Act by deliberately bypassing emissions controls.
Charges
Violations of environmental and consumer protection laws
Outcome
Paid billions in fines, including criminal penalties.
Several employees indicted and prosecuted.
Significance
Intersection of environmental and consumer protection enforcement.
Summary Table
| Case | Year | Entity/Individual | Violation | Outcome | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volkswagen Dieselgate | 2017 | Volkswagen AG | Emissions test fraud | $2.8B fine, guilty plea | Corporate fraud, environmental harm |
| Theranos | 2018-22 | Holmes, Balwani | Fraudulent health claims | Convictions for fraud | Health tech consumer fraud |
| Purdue Pharma | 2020 | Purdue Pharma | Misbranding opioids | $4.5B settlement, bankruptcy | Pharma role in opioid crisis |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 7 | 2017 | Samsung Electronics | Product safety failures | Recalls, fines | Product safety responsibility |
| Johnson & Johnson Talc | 2021 | J&J | Concealing asbestos risk | Civil verdicts, investigations | Product safety and consumer trust |
| Volkswagen Clean Air Act | 2016 | Volkswagen | Environmental law violations | Criminal fines, prosecutions | Environmental-consumer law overlap |
Conclusion
Consumer protection criminal cases highlight how deceptive and unsafe corporate practices harm public trust and safety. These landmark prosecutions emphasize:
The critical role of regulatory agencies (EPA, FDA, FTC) in enforcement
Increasing willingness to pursue criminal charges against corporations and executives
The growing intersection of consumer protection with environmental and health laws
RELATED Blog
0 comments