Human Rights In Prisons Case Law
Overview
Prisoners retain fundamental human rights, though some are restricted for security or order.
Key rights protected include:
Right to life (Article 2, ECHR)
Prohibition of torture or inhuman/degrading treatment (Article 3)
Right to a fair hearing (Article 6)
Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8)
Cases often involve conditions of detention, medical care, use of force, disciplinary procedures, or segregation.
Landmark Cases on Human Rights in Prisons
1. R (on the application of Wilkinson) v. Secretary of State for Justice (2009) — UK
Facts:
Challenge to the regime of "Special Security Wings" (solitary confinement) in prisons.
Held:
The Court ruled that excessive solitary confinement can amount to inhuman or degrading treatment, violating Article 3.
Significance:
Sets limits on the use of solitary confinement and emphasizes prisoners’ dignity.
2. McGlinchey v. United Kingdom (2003) — European Court of Human Rights
Facts:
Prisoner died after inadequate medical care in prison.
Ruling:
Court held that the State breached Article 2 (right to life) by failing to provide proper medical treatment.
Impact:
States have a positive obligation to protect life through adequate healthcare.
3. R (on the application of Khatun) v. Newham London Borough Council (2004) — UK
Facts:
Prisoner’s family visits were restricted without proper justification.
Court Decision:
Restrictions breached Article 8 (right to family life).
Lesson:
Prisoners maintain the right to family contact; restrictions must be necessary and proportionate.
4. R v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Venables (1998) — UK
Facts:
The case concerned the imprisonment and treatment of juvenile offenders.
Held:
The court emphasized the need for special protections for juvenile prisoners to avoid breaches of Article 3.
Significance:
Highlights vulnerability of juveniles in custody and human rights protections.
5. Price v. United Kingdom (2001) — European Court of Human Rights
Facts:
Prisoner subjected to prolonged segregation for disciplinary reasons.
Decision:
Found to violate Article 3 due to degrading and inhuman treatment.
Takeaway:
Prolonged isolation must meet strict conditions to avoid human rights breaches.
6. R (on the application of Collins) v. Secretary of State for Justice (2016) — UK
Facts:
Prisoners challenged the lack of access to legal materials and advice in prisons.
Outcome:
Court recognized that access to justice is fundamental, and lack of resources can breach Article 6 rights.
Summary Table
| Case | Year | Issue | Holding | Human Right Focus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wilkinson v. SSJ | 2009 | Solitary confinement | Violation of Article 3 | Prohibition of inhuman treatment |
| McGlinchey v. UK | 2003 | Inadequate medical care | Breach of Article 2 | Right to life |
| Khatun v. Newham | 2004 | Restriction on family visits | Breach of Article 8 | Right to family life |
| Venables (ex parte) | 1998 | Juvenile prisoner treatment | Protection under Article 3 | Special protections for juveniles |
| Price v. UK | 2001 | Prolonged segregation | Breach of Article 3 | Prohibition of degrading treatment |
| Collins v. SSJ | 2016 | Access to legal materials | Breach of Article 6 | Right to a fair trial |
Key Takeaways
Prisoners keep basic human rights, even in custody.
Courts scrutinize solitary confinement, medical care, and family contact closely.
Special attention is paid to juveniles and vulnerable prisoners.
States have a positive duty to ensure humane treatment and access to justice.
Violations can lead to case quashing, compensation, or reform orders.
RELATED Blog
0 comments