Lottery Scam Prosecutions In Usa
1. United States v. Charles N. Bell (U.S., 2015)
Summary:
Charles N. Bell operated a lottery scam targeting seniors across multiple states. Victims were told they had won large lottery prizes but needed to pay taxes or processing fees in advance to claim the money.
Prosecution:
Bell was charged with mail fraud, wire fraud, and conspiracy under federal law.
The FBI investigated after multiple complaints and financial records traced fraudulent wire transfers to Bell.
Outcome:
Bell was convicted and sentenced to 10 years in federal prison.
Ordered to pay $3.2 million in restitution to victims.
Relevance:
Demonstrates the targeting of vulnerable populations using advance-fee lottery fraud.
2. United States v. Dorothea Taylor (U.S., 2017)
Summary:
Dorothea Taylor ran a scam via email and phone calls, claiming recipients had won international lotteries and instructing them to send money to cover “processing fees.”
Prosecution:
Charged with mail fraud and wire fraud.
Investigation involved coordination between the FBI and the U.S. Postal Inspection Service.
Outcome:
Taylor was sentenced to 7 years in federal prison.
Restitution exceeded $1.5 million.
Relevance:
Illustrates the common method of instructing victims to pay “fees” before receiving non-existent winnings.
3. United States v. Rolf Larsen (U.S., 2009)
Summary:
Rolf Larsen orchestrated a large-scale lottery scam targeting over 200 victims across several states, using fake check schemes combined with lottery prize claims.
Prosecution:
Charged with mail fraud, wire fraud, and conspiracy.
Investigators traced the fake checks and fraudulent bank accounts used in the scheme.
Outcome:
Larsen sentenced to 12 years in federal prison.
Ordered to pay $5 million in restitution.
Relevance:
Shows the use of fake financial instruments to lend credibility to lottery scams.
4. United States v. Michael F. Smith (U.S., 2013)
Summary:
Michael F. Smith sent letters and emails to victims claiming they had won multi-million-dollar lottery prizes but needed to pay taxes upfront.
Prosecution:
Charged with mail fraud and wire fraud.
The investigation involved tracking wire transfers and fraudulent accounts linked to Smith.
Outcome:
Smith was sentenced to 9 years in federal prison.
Ordered to pay $2.8 million in restitution.
Relevance:
Highlights the use of cross-state communications to commit fraud, making it a federal crime.
5. United States v. Linda Martinez (U.S., 2018)
Summary:
Linda Martinez ran a lottery scam phone operation, convincing victims to send money to “unlock” their winnings.
Prosecution:
Charged with wire fraud, mail fraud, and conspiracy.
Federal prosecutors coordinated with state law enforcement agencies to track victim reports and financial transactions.
Outcome:
Martinez sentenced to 6 years in federal prison.
Restitution totaled over $1.2 million.
Relevance:
Shows the increasing prevalence of telecommunication-based lottery scams.
6. United States v. James and Carol Stein (U.S., 2011)
Summary:
James and Carol Stein operated a lottery fraud ring that targeted elderly victims, claiming they had won sweepstakes and lotteries but needed to pay fees to claim their prize.
Prosecution:
Charged with mail fraud, wire fraud, and conspiracy to commit fraud.
Federal investigation included cooperation with the U.S. Postal Service, IRS, and local police departments.
Outcome:
Both were sentenced to 8 years in federal prison.
Required to pay $4 million in restitution.
Relevance:
Demonstrates organized, multi-person lottery scam operations targeting elderly victims.
7. United States v. Wayne Martin (U.S., 2014)
Summary:
Wayne Martin ran an online lottery scam claiming victims had won foreign lotteries. Victims were asked to pay “legal fees” and “taxes” to release their winnings.
Prosecution:
Charged with wire fraud and conspiracy.
Investigation involved tracing electronic funds transfers and online communications used to solicit payments.
Outcome:
Martin sentenced to 7 years in federal prison.
Ordered to repay victims totaling $2 million.
Relevance:
Shows how online communications expanded the reach of lottery fraud schemes.
Key Legal Principles in U.S. Lottery Scam Cases
Applicable Laws:
Mail Fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1341): Using the mail system to execute a fraudulent scheme.
Wire Fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1343): Using electronic communications (phone, email, internet) to defraud victims.
Conspiracy to Commit Fraud (18 U.S.C. § 371): Multiple parties coordinating to commit fraudulent acts.
Typical Methods of Fraud:
Advance-fee scams: victims pay “taxes” or “processing fees.”
Fake lottery or sweepstakes notifications via mail, email, or phone.
Targeting vulnerable populations, especially the elderly.
Consequences for Defendants:
Federal prison sentences (usually 6–12 years depending on scale).
Mandatory restitution to victims.
Forfeiture of assets obtained through fraud.
Trends:
Shift from traditional mail scams to online and phone-based scams.
Multi-state operations make federal jurisdiction applicable.
Coordinated enforcement by the FBI, Postal Inspection Service, and state authorities.
RELATED Blog
0 comments