Bitcoin And Blockchain-Related Offences
1. Introduction: Bitcoin, Blockchain, and Legal Issues
Bitcoin is a cryptocurrency, a digital currency operating on a blockchain, a decentralized ledger that records transactions securely. While the technology is legal, the anonymity and decentralized nature make it attractive for illegal activities such as:
Money laundering
Fraud and Ponzi schemes
Tax evasion
Cybercrimes (hacking, ransomware payments)
Unlicensed cryptocurrency exchanges
Legislation varies by country, but most have invoked existing financial, cybercrime, or anti-money laundering (AML) laws to prosecute Bitcoin-related offences.
2. Types of Bitcoin/Blockchain-Related Offences
Fraud and Ponzi schemes – Misrepresentation to investors promising high returns in cryptocurrency.
Money laundering – Using crypto transactions to conceal the origin of illegal funds.
Tax evasion – Failure to declare cryptocurrency holdings or gains.
Unlicensed exchange operations – Running a crypto exchange without regulatory approval.
Cybercrime – Hacking wallets, ransomware, and theft of crypto-assets.
3. Case Law Examples
Case 1: United States v. Ross Ulbricht (Silk Road Case)
Jurisdiction: USA
Year: 2015
Facts: Ross Ulbricht operated “Silk Road,” an online darknet marketplace, where users could buy drugs, fake IDs, and other illegal goods using Bitcoin.
Charges: Money laundering, computer hacking, conspiracy to traffic narcotics.
Outcome: Ulbricht was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment.
Significance: The case established that Bitcoin transactions, though pseudonymous, can be traced and used as evidence in criminal proceedings.
Case 2: SEC v. BitConnect
Jurisdiction: India & USA
Year: 2018–2021
Facts: BitConnect operated a cryptocurrency lending platform promising huge returns. It was accused of being a Ponzi scheme. Investors were lured to deposit Bitcoin, which was then misappropriated.
Charges: Fraud, misrepresentation of investment products.
Outcome: Regulatory authorities shut down the platform; promoters faced civil and criminal penalties.
Significance: Highlighted the risk of unsupervised crypto investment schemes and regulatory intervention.
Case 3: Shailesh Lakhani v. Union of India (Indian Bitcoin Ruling)
Jurisdiction: India
Year: 2020
Facts: The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) had imposed a ban preventing banks from dealing with cryptocurrency exchanges. Crypto exchanges challenged this in the Supreme Court.
Outcome: Supreme Court struck down the RBI circular, allowing exchanges to operate legally.
Significance: Though not a criminal case, it set a precedent for regulatory recognition of cryptocurrency in India. Cases of fraud or offences in crypto would be prosecuted under IT Act 2000 and PMLA (Prevention of Money Laundering Act).
Case 4: United States v. Mark Scott (Bitcoin Ransomware)
Jurisdiction: USA
Year: 2020
Facts: Mark Scott used ransomware to hack computer systems and demanded payments in Bitcoin.
Charges: Wire fraud, conspiracy, computer intrusion, and money laundering.
Outcome: Convicted and sentenced to prison.
Significance: Demonstrates how Bitcoin is used in cybercrime, and courts treat it like any other currency in criminal proceedings.
Case 5: People v. Patrick McDonnell (Bitcoin Theft)
Jurisdiction: USA
Year: 2019
Facts: Patrick McDonnell stole Bitcoin worth $500,000 from a digital wallet by hacking into the account.
Charges: Theft, computer fraud, money laundering.
Outcome: Convicted and sentenced.
Significance: Confirmed that stolen cryptocurrency is treated as property under law, and theft is prosecutable under standard criminal statutes.
Case 6: SEC v. Ripple Labs
Jurisdiction: USA
Year: 2020–Present
Facts: The SEC alleged that Ripple Labs raised over $1.3 billion through an unregistered digital asset offering (XRP token).
Charges: Violation of securities law (unregistered securities).
Status: Ongoing litigation.
Significance: Raises legal questions about whether cryptocurrencies are securities and regulatory jurisdiction over blockchain-based fundraising.
4. Legal Principles Derived from These Cases
Bitcoin is property or asset – Theft, fraud, and money laundering involving Bitcoin are prosecutable.
Blockchain transactions are traceable – Law enforcement can trace pseudonymous transactions using blockchain forensics.
Unregistered investment schemes are illegal – Promises of high returns using crypto attract fraud charges.
Cross-border cooperation – Many crypto crimes require international collaboration due to the decentralized nature.
Regulatory frameworks are evolving – Laws such as PMLA, IT Act (India), or SEC regulations (USA) increasingly cover crypto offences.
5. Conclusion
Bitcoin and blockchain technology, while revolutionary, have been misused for crimes ranging from fraud to ransomware. Courts worldwide have demonstrated that existing legal frameworks are adaptable to prosecute these offences. Case law shows a clear trend:
Pseudonymity does not grant immunity.
Crypto is treated as property, currency, or securities depending on context.
Offences like money laundering, fraud, and theft are actionable.
RELATED Blog
comments