Illegal Medical Practice Prosecutions
1. Introduction
Illegal medical practice refers to providing medical services without proper authorization, license, or qualifications, or engaging in medical activities prohibited by law. This can include:
Performing surgeries without a license
Prescribing or dispensing drugs illegally
Practicing medicine without registration
Fraudulent medical claims or false certification
Objective of criminal law enforcement:
Protect patients from harm
Maintain professional standards in medicine
Deter unlicensed individuals from exploiting vulnerable patients
Ensure public trust in healthcare
2. Legal Framework
Finland (example)
Health Care Professionals Act (559/1994): Requires licensing and registration for medical practice.
Penal Code (Rikoslaki 39/1889), Chapter 16 Section 1: Criminal liability for causing bodily harm or death through negligent or unlicensed medical practice.
Act on Supervision of Health Care (Viranomaisvalvontalaki 869/2000): Allows authorities to investigate illegal practices.
General Principles in Criminal Law
Intentional illegal practice: Direct criminal liability if the practitioner knowingly practices without a license.
Negligent illegal practice: Liability may arise if harm results, even without intentional misconduct.
International Law
Many countries adhere to WHO guidelines on medical ethics and patient safety, indirectly supporting criminal liability for illegal practice.
3. Case Law Illustrating Illegal Medical Practice Prosecutions
Here are six notable cases:
Case 1: KKO 2002:19, Supreme Court of Finland
Issue: Practicing medicine without a license
Facts:
Individual performed minor surgeries at a private clinic without being a registered medical practitioner.
Holding:
Convicted for illegal medical practice and endangerment of health.
Court emphasized patient safety and regulatory compliance.
Importance:
Established that all surgical procedures require a licensed medical professional.
Case 2: Helsinki District Court, R 2006:41
Issue: Illegal cosmetic procedures
Facts:
Defendant performed cosmetic injections (botulinum toxin) without medical license.
Holding:
Convicted for illegal medical practice and bodily harm.
Court imposed fines and suspended operations.
Importance:
Demonstrates liability for non-traditional medical interventions, including cosmetic treatments.
Case 3: Turku Court of Appeal, R 2010:24
Issue: Prescribing prescription drugs without authorization
Facts:
Defendant sold controlled medications to patients without a valid license or prescription rights.
Holding:
Convicted of illegal medical practice and violation of narcotics regulations.
Sentenced to prison and ordered restitution for patients affected.
Importance:
Highlights intersection of illegal medical practice and pharmaceutical regulation.
Case 4: KKO 2013:57, Supreme Court
Issue: Unlicensed dental practice
Facts:
Individual operated a dental clinic without formal dental qualifications.
Holding:
Convicted under Health Care Professionals Act and Penal Code for endangerment of health.
License requirement strictly enforced regardless of claimed experience.
Importance:
Reinforces strict licensing requirements for all health-related professions.
Case 5: Oulu District Court, R 2016:18
Issue: Illegal childbirth assistance
Facts:
Midwife assisted home births without proper registration or oversight.
Holding:
Convicted for illegal medical practice; court considered risk to both mother and child.
Importance:
Shows that risk to vulnerable populations (e.g., infants, pregnant women) aggravates liability.
Case 6: Helsinki Court of Appeal, R 2019:12
Issue: Fraudulent medical certification
Facts:
Defendant issued fake medical certificates to enable patients to obtain benefits or exemptions.
Holding:
Convicted of illegal medical practice, fraud, and forgery.
Sentences included imprisonment and revocation of any medical credentials.
Importance:
Highlights that even administrative or certification activities fall under medical practice law.
Case 7: KKO 2021:14, Supreme Court
Issue: Telemedicine without license
Facts:
Individual provided online consultations and prescribed medications without being licensed in Finland.
Holding:
Convicted for illegal medical practice across national borders.
Court emphasized telemedicine is regulated under the same licensing laws as in-person practice.
Importance:
Shows criminal liability extends to digital healthcare services.
4. Key Takeaways
Licensing is mandatory:
Practicing medicine, dentistry, midwifery, or prescribing medication without proper registration is criminally punishable.
Patient safety is paramount:
Courts prioritize risk of harm or actual harm to patients.
Broad scope of offenses:
Includes surgeries, cosmetic procedures, pharmaceuticals, certifications, and telemedicine.
Intersection with other crimes:
Illegal practice often overlaps with fraud, forgery, narcotics violations, or endangerment of life.
Digital health services are regulated:
Online consultations and prescriptions require the same licensing standards.
Penalties:
Range from fines to imprisonment, depending on severity, intent, and harm caused.
RELATED Blog
comments