Voter Impersonation Prosecutions
🔍 What Is Voter Impersonation?
Voter impersonation is a type of electoral fraud where an individual votes by pretending to be someone else. This can occur in:
In-person voting at polling stations (e.g. pretending to be a registered voter)
Postal voting (e.g. intercepting and completing someone else’s postal ballot)
Proxy voting abuse (voting on behalf of another without authorisation)
This offence undermines public confidence in the electoral system and can carry significant criminal penalties.
⚖️ Legal Framework
Key legislation used in voter impersonation prosecutions includes:
Representation of the People Act 1983:
Section 60 – Personation: knowingly voting as someone else (whether that person is living, dead, or fictitious).
Section 61 – Penalties for personation: includes up to 2 years’ imprisonment, a fine, or both.
Section 62 – Applies the same offences to local government elections.
Fraud Act 2006 – where false representation is involved (less common than using RPA 1983 directly).
Electoral Administration Act 2006 & Elections Act 2022 – introduced reforms, including voter ID requirements.
📚 Case Law – Detailed Examples
1. R v. Choudhury (2005) – Birmingham Election Fraud Scandal
Facts:
In one of the UK’s most high-profile election fraud cases, multiple individuals were involved in large-scale electoral fraud in Birmingham’s 2004 local elections. Choudhury and others were Labour candidates accused of using bogus postal votes.
Legal Issues:
Fraudulent completion and submission of postal votes.
Alleged impersonation and harvesting of ballots.
Judgment:
Election result declared void in court (via election petition).
Civil rather than criminal proceedings for some involved, though later criminal probes followed.
Significance:
Led to calls for major electoral reform.
Demonstrated how impersonation may accompany broader ballot fraud.
2. R v. Mohammed Hussain (2008) – Derbyshire Postal Vote Fraud
Facts:
Hussain applied for postal votes in the names of other voters and completed them fraudulently during a local council election.
Legal Issues:
Personation via postal vote (Representation of the People Act 1983, s.60).
Fraud by false representation.
Judgment:
Convicted and sentenced to 6 months imprisonment, suspended.
Disqualified from holding elected office.
Significance:
Showed courts treat postal voter impersonation as seriously as in-person.
3. R v. Tariq Mahmood (2008) – Slough Council Election
Facts:
Mahmood, a Conservative councillor, was involved in forging multiple bogus voter registrations and used postal votes to impersonate electors.
Legal Issues:
Personation and conspiracy to defraud.
Offences under the Representation of the People Act and Forgery Act.
Judgment:
Convicted and sentenced to 15 months’ imprisonment.
Judge described it as “a serious attack on democracy.”
Significance:
One of the first successful criminal prosecutions resulting in jail for impersonation and electoral fraud.
4. R v. Mohammed Khurshid Alam (2011) – Tower Hamlets Election Fraud
Facts:
Alam used false addresses to register voters and then cast votes in their names during a Tower Hamlets council election.
Legal Issues:
Voter registration fraud and personation.
Judgment:
Convicted and sentenced to 6 months imprisonment, suspended.
Disqualified from standing for election.
Significance:
Reinforced that manipulating the electoral roll for personation is criminal.
5. R v. Awad (2015) – Camden Council By-Election
Facts:
Awad was caught attempting to vote twice — once for himself and once in another person’s name using their polling card.
Legal Issues:
In-person personation (s.60 RPA 1983).
Judgment:
Fined £1,000 and ordered to pay court costs.
No custodial sentence, but criminal record imposed.
Significance:
In-person impersonation prosecuted despite it being a single vote.
6. R v. Syed Hoque (2020) – Peterborough Election Investigation
Facts:
Hoque was involved in a postal vote fraud scheme where he was accused of submitting forms in others' names to gain voting control.
Legal Issues:
Multiple counts under s.60 RPA.
Fraud and electoral malpractice.
Judgment:
Convicted and received community sentence and disqualification from political office.
Significance:
Reinforced increasing scrutiny on postal vote manipulation.
🧾 Additional Case Mentions
Oldham 2001 case – Labour councillors were disqualified for applying for postal votes for people who hadn’t requested them.
Peterborough 2019 – Though no prosecution followed, a by-election was called after serious allegations of personation and voter intimidation emerged.
⚖️ Key Legal Principles
| Principle | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Personation is a criminal offence | Voting in someone else’s name is punishable by imprisonment or fine. |
| Covers postal & in-person votes | Impersonation includes postal, proxy, and polling station fraud. |
| Disqualification from office | Conviction leads to bans from standing or holding public office. |
| Wider fraud can accompany offence | Often linked with false registrations, ballot tampering, or intimidation. |
| Severity depends on scale and intent | Organised or repeated offences attract harsher penalties. |
✅ Summary
Voter impersonation in the UK is a serious electoral offence under the Representation of the People Act 1983. While rare, when it occurs — especially involving postal vote fraud, false registrations, or multiple offences — it results in criminal prosecution, imprisonment, and political disqualification.
Courts view such conduct as an attack on democratic integrity, and sentences reflect the harm caused to public trust, even where only a small number of votes are affected.
RELATED Blog
0 comments