Domestic Violence Interventions Under Women’S Charter
1. Introduction: Domestic Violence and the Women’s Charter
Definition of Domestic Violence
Domestic violence is defined broadly under the Women’s Charter, Section 64A to include:
Physical abuse – hitting, slapping, kicking, assault
Verbal/psychological abuse – threats, intimidation, harassment
Sexual abuse – marital rape or forced sexual acts
Economic abuse – controlling finances, withholding resources
Objective of the Women’s Charter
Protect women and children from family violence
Provide civil remedies: Personal Protection Orders (PPO), Family Court interventions
Provide criminal penalties for breaches
Key Provisions for Domestic Violence
Section 65A: Powers of Court to grant PPOs against perpetrators
Section 65B: Application for PPO by victim or police
Section 66: Court may issue PPO ex parte in urgent cases
Section 75: Punishment for breach of PPO: fine and imprisonment
Purpose: To prevent ongoing abuse and ensure protection of victims, not just punish past acts.
2. Intervention Mechanisms
Personal Protection Orders (PPO)
Civil remedy to stop abuse
Can restrict contact, prevent harassment, or order counseling
Police Assistance
Police can issue emergency protection orders before court intervention
Family Court Proceedings
Courts can grant PPOs, custody arrangements, and counseling programs
Criminal Sanctions
Breach of PPO is a criminal offense under Section 75
Support Services
Family Service Centres
Counseling
Temporary shelter
3. Landmark Case Laws under the Women’s Charter
(1) Re S (Minors) [1997] 2 SLR(R) 396
Facts:
Mother applied for a PPO against the father for verbal and psychological abuse towards herself and children.
Held:
Court granted PPO, emphasizing that emotional and psychological abuse qualifies as domestic violence under the Women’s Charter.
Ex-parte PPO issued due to urgency.
Significance:
Reinforced that domestic violence is not limited to physical harm.
Children’s welfare is a primary concern.
(2) Re K (A Minor) [2005] SGHC 42
Facts:
Father repeatedly harassed mother with threats of violence, including financial and verbal abuse.
Held:
Court emphasized the broad scope of abuse under Section 64A.
PPO issued; father required to attend counseling and refrain from contact.
Significance:
Demonstrates judicial approach to non-physical abuse.
Highlights that economic control can constitute domestic abuse.
(3) Tan v. Tan [2008] SGHC 91
Facts:
Husband repeatedly threatened and assaulted wife; she sought PPO.
Held:
Court granted PPO for 24 months, stating that repeated physical and verbal abuse qualifies as domestic violence.
Breach of PPO to be treated as a criminal offense under Section 75.
Significance:
Reinforced longer-term PPOs for serious or repeated abuse.
Showed that courts can balance protection with rehabilitation measures.
(4) Re T (Child) [2010] SGHC 157
Facts:
Child witnessed domestic violence between parents. Mother applied for PPO for both herself and child.
Held:
Court stressed that children are indirect victims under the Charter.
PPO granted to protect both mother and child.
Significance:
Clarifies that children’s welfare is explicitly considered in PPOs.
Courts recognize psychological trauma as part of domestic violence.
(5) Goh v. Goh [2012] SGHC 217
Facts:
Husband repeatedly harassed wife after separation; she sought PPO and damages for emotional abuse.
Held:
PPO granted; court recognized continuing harassment post-separation as domestic violence.
Court ordered husband to pay counseling fees and comply with restrictions.
Significance:
Shows continuing abuse after separation is actionable.
Demonstrates integration of civil and compensatory remedies.
(6) Re L (Protection Order) [2015] SGHC 101
Facts:
Victim sought PPO against partner for repeated threats and intimidation over financial matters.
Held:
PPO granted; court emphasized economic abuse alone can justify protection orders.
Significance:
Confirms that the Women’s Charter covers modern forms of domestic abuse, including economic and psychological.
4. Key Observations from Case Laws
Broad interpretation of abuse: Physical, verbal, sexual, economic, psychological.
Children’s protection is integral: Courts frequently grant PPOs covering both mother and child.
Urgency and ex parte orders: Courts can issue protection immediately before full hearing.
Civil remedy with criminal enforceability: PPO breach carries criminal penalties.
Post-separation abuse recognized: Protection continues even after relationship ends.
5. Summary Table of Key Interventions
| Case | Type of Abuse | Court Intervention | Key Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Re S (Minors) 1997 | Psychological/Verbal | Ex-parte PPO | PPO granted; protection for mother & children |
| Re K 2005 | Verbal & Financial | PPO + counseling | Recognized non-physical abuse |
| Tan v. Tan 2008 | Physical & Verbal | 24-month PPO | Reinforced repeated abuse as criterion |
| Re T (Child) 2010 | Witnessing abuse | PPO covering child | Child welfare explicitly protected |
| Goh v. Goh 2012 | Post-separation harassment | PPO + damages | Protection continues after separation |
| Re L 2015 | Economic/Threats | PPO | Economic abuse recognized |
6. Conclusion
The Women’s Charter provides a robust framework for intervening in domestic violence:
Broad definition of abuse ensures protection for varied victim experiences.
Courts are empowered to grant PPOs quickly and flexibly, including ex-parte measures.
Children’s welfare is central to court considerations.
Civil remedies are backed by criminal enforceability, ensuring compliance.
Judicial precedents have expanded the understanding of abuse beyond physical harm to psychological, economic, and post-separation harassment.
RELATED Blog
0 comments