Provisions For Digital Evidence In Pakistani Courts
Digital evidence has become a crucial aspect of criminal investigations and legal proceedings, particularly with the rise in cybercrimes, online fraud, and the widespread use of technology in daily life. In Pakistan, the legal framework regarding digital evidence is governed by various statutes, with a strong focus on its admissibility, collection, preservation, and presentation in court.
The Cyber Crimes Law in Pakistan, specifically the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA) 2016, provides a framework for addressing cyber-related offenses and dealing with digital evidence in legal proceedings. However, Pakistan also relies on the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) and Qanun-e-Shahadat Order (QSO) 1984 for general rules on evidence, including digital or electronic evidence.
1. Legal Framework for Digital Evidence in Pakistan
Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act, 2016 (PECA)
PECA is Pakistan’s primary law for regulating cybercrimes, and it provides comprehensive provisions regarding digital evidence in cases of cybercrime. Key sections under PECA related to digital evidence include:
Section 10: This section deals with the unauthorized access to data, and it recognizes digital evidence as key in cases involving unauthorized computer or network access.
Section 13: It criminalizes the tampering with electronic evidence, which is relevant when dealing with digital content, like emails, SMS, or any data stored on computers.
Section 21: This section defines cyber terrorism, which involves the use of digital evidence in relation to national security.
Qanun-e-Shahadat Order (QSO), 1984
The Qanun-e-Shahadat Order (QSO) outlines the general rules for admissibility of evidence in Pakistan, including provisions for electronic evidence:
Section 59: Recognizes documents generated by computers or other electronic devices as evidence if the document is authenticated.
Section 65-B: This section permits the admission of electronic records in court, but these records must satisfy the criteria of authenticity and integrity.
2. Case Law: Key Precedents on Digital Evidence in Pakistan
**Case 1: Shahbaz Sharif v. State (2020) - Admissibility of Digital Evidence
Facts:
Shahbaz Sharif, the leader of the opposition in Pakistan, was involved in a case where audio recordings of alleged conversations between government officials and business tycoons were used as evidence. The defense challenged the admissibility of the audio recordings in court, arguing that the recordings were tampered with and lacked authenticity.
Legal Framework:
Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984: The defense contested that digital recordings should be subjected to the same standards of proof as physical documents and evidence.
PECA, 2016: Under PECA, the handling of digital records was scrutinized for any tampering or unauthorized access.
Outcome:
The court ruled that the electronic evidence was admissible under Section 65-B of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984, which allows the admission of digital evidence if the integrity of the evidence can be maintained and the chain of custody is unbroken. In this case, the court acknowledged that while the source of digital evidence is crucial, it is not necessary to physically produce the device from which the data was retrieved, as long as the evidence can be authenticated by other means.
**Case 2: State v. Muhammad Raza (2019) - Digital Evidence in Cybercrime
Facts:
Muhammad Raza was accused of online fraud and identity theft after he allegedly used phishing techniques to steal sensitive financial data from several individuals. The investigation uncovered email trails, IP logs, and SMS exchanges as part of the evidence.
Legal Framework:
Section 10 of PECA (2016): Addresses unauthorized access to computer systems and unauthorized data acquisition.
Qanun-e-Shahadat Order: The defense objected to the admissibility of digital evidence, claiming that emails and IP addresses were not reliable evidence and could easily be tampered with.
Outcome:
The court accepted the digital evidence, ruling that electronic communications and IP addresses are valid under Section 65-B of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order as electronic records. The court emphasized that the authenticity of digital evidence must be established through the testimony of forensic experts and through the chain of custody to prevent tampering or manipulation.
**Case 3: Government of Pakistan v. Zubair Ahmad (2018) - Digital Evidence in Cyber Terrorism
Facts:
Zubair Ahmad was accused of engaging in cyber terrorism by posting violent content on social media platforms and inciting public unrest. Investigators retrieved his social media posts and chat logs as evidence of the crime.
Legal Framework:
Section 21 of PECA, 2016: Provides for the regulation of cyber terrorism, emphasizing the role of digital content in promoting violence or unrest.
Section 59 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order: Recognizes digital content as valid electronic evidence in criminal trials.
Outcome:
The court ruled that social media posts and digital communication were admissible under PECA and the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order. It emphasized the importance of expert testimony to authenticate the digital evidence and ensure that the evidence had not been altered or tampered with. The court acknowledged the growing importance of digital evidence in cyber terrorism cases, ruling that such content could be used to prove intent and criminal activity.
**Case 4: Rizwan Ali v. State (2017) - Digital Evidence in Data Breach
Facts:
Rizwan Ali was accused of data breach and hacking after gaining unauthorized access to a company’s server and stealing proprietary information. The company presented server logs, file access records, and emails as evidence of the breach.
Legal Framework:
Section 13 of PECA: Criminalizes unauthorized access to data and digital misappropriation.
Section 65-B of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order: The defense challenged the admissibility of the logs, arguing that server data could be easily manipulated.
Outcome:
The court ruled that the server logs and email exchanges were admissible evidence, as they met the requirements of authenticity under Section 65-B of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order. The court also emphasized the need for forensic examination to ensure that the digital evidence was untampered. The case highlighted the growing reliance on forensic analysis in validating digital evidence in cybercrime investigations.
**Case 5: Imran Khan v. State (2021) - Defamation via Digital Platforms
Facts:
Imran Khan was accused of defamation after allegedly posting false and malicious content about a public official on a social media platform. The victim presented the social media posts and screen recordings as evidence in the trial.
Legal Framework:
Section 20 of PECA, 2016: Deals with cyber harassment and the publication of false information that can harm an individual's reputation.
Section 59 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order: Admissibility of electronic records in court.
Outcome:
The court admitted the screen recordings and posts as evidence, citing Section 65-B of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order. The court stated that social media posts could be used as valid evidence in cases of online defamation, provided the source was traceable and the evidence had not been tampered with. It also called for expert testimony from forensic specialists to verify the authenticity of the posts.
Conclusion
The legal framework for digital evidence in Pakistan, especially under the PECA, 2016 and the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984, has evolved to address the increasing reliance on technology and the growing threat of cybercrimes. Key provisions like Section 65-B of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order allow electronic records to be admitted as evidence, provided they meet the requirements of authenticity and integrity.
The case laws discussed above emphasize several critical aspects:
The admissibility of digital evidence in criminal cases, particularly in relation to cybercrimes, defamation, cyber terrorism, and data breaches.
The necessity of forensic experts to authenticate digital evidence and establish its chain of custody.
The importance of proper handling and documentation of digital evidence to avoid challenges of tampering or manipulation.
As digital technology continues to play a central role in modern-day offenses, Pakistani courts are increasingly relying on digital evidence to prosecute a wide array of criminal activities, marking a significant shift in the judicial approach to cybercrimes and electronic records.
RELATED Blog
0 comments