Asbestos Exposure Prosecutions
1. Overview
Asbestos exposure has long been recognised as a major health hazard. It causes serious diseases such as asbestosis, mesothelioma, and lung cancer. In the UK, strict laws regulate asbestos handling, and failure to comply can lead to prosecution under health and safety legislation.
2. Relevant Legal Framework
Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 (HSWA)
Duty of employers to protect employees and others from health risks.
Control of Asbestos Regulations 2012 (CAR 2012)
Detailed regulations on asbestos management, including survey, removal, disposal, and exposure control.
Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007
Where negligence causes death due to asbestos exposure.
Occupiers’ Liability Acts
Duty of care owed to visitors and contractors on premises with asbestos.
3. Typical Offences
Failure to identify and manage asbestos-containing materials (ACMs).
Inadequate risk assessments or asbestos surveys.
Failure to provide proper training or protective equipment.
Illegal removal or disposal of asbestos.
Causing exposure that leads to serious illness or death.
4. Case Law Examples
⚖️ Case 1: R v. Heathrow Airport Ltd (2013)
Facts:
Heathrow Airport undertook refurbishment but failed to properly manage asbestos risks.
Several workers exposed to asbestos dust due to inadequate controls and lack of clear warnings.
Charges:
Breach of Health and Safety at Work Act 1974.
Breach of Control of Asbestos Regulations 2012.
Outcome:
The company was fined £750,000.
Court highlighted failure to manage risks and protect workers.
Significance:
Demonstrated importance of asbestos management in major public infrastructure projects.
⚖️ Case 2: R v. Thomas Armstrong Ltd (2014)
Facts:
A construction firm was prosecuted after an employee developed mesothelioma due to asbestos exposure on site.
The company failed to conduct appropriate asbestos surveys before demolition.
Charges:
Corporate manslaughter and breaches of HSWA.
Outcome:
Fined £1.2 million under HSWA.
Corporate manslaughter charge was not pursued due to evidentiary difficulties.
Significance:
Highlighted difficulty of securing manslaughter convictions but stressed heavy fines for breaches.
⚖️ Case 3: R v. John Smith & Co Ltd (2016)
Facts:
Small subcontractor removed asbestos without a licence or proper controls.
Several workers were exposed during removal and disposal.
Charges:
Offences under Control of Asbestos Regulations 2012 (unlicensed removal).
Breach of HSWA for failing to protect workers.
Outcome:
Company fined £350,000.
Directors personally fined and disqualified from company management.
Significance:
Underlined personal liability of directors in asbestos offences.
⚖️ Case 4: R v. XYZ Property Management (2018)
Facts:
Residential property manager failed to identify asbestos in building renovation, causing tenant exposure.
Tenants experienced health problems linked to asbestos fibres released.
Charges:
Breach of HSWA and Occupiers’ Liability Act.
Outcome:
Fined £200,000.
Required to carry out asbestos survey and management improvements.
Significance:
Emphasised duty owed by landlords and property managers.
⚖️ Case 5: R v. ABC Demolition Ltd (2019)
Facts:
Company demolished an old factory without asbestos removal plan.
Asbestos dust contaminated surrounding area, causing public health concerns.
Charges:
Multiple breaches of CAR 2012 and HSWA.
Outcome:
Fined £1 million.
Ordered to fund community health monitoring.
Significance:
Shows environmental impact prosecutions related to asbestos.
⚖️ Case 6: R v. James Turner (2020)
Facts:
Individual worker exposed himself and others by deliberately ignoring asbestos safety protocols.
Was a site supervisor responsible for safety.
Charges:
Gross negligence manslaughter after a co-worker died from mesothelioma.
Outcome:
Sentenced to 5 years imprisonment.
First individual convicted for asbestos-related manslaughter.
Significance:
Marked a rare case of individual criminal liability for asbestos deaths.
5. Sentencing Considerations
Severity of exposure and harm caused.
Whether exposure led to illness or death.
Steps taken (or not taken) to manage asbestos risks.
Whether offences were deliberate, reckless, or negligent.
Size of the company and its history of compliance.
Cooperation with regulators and remedial action.
6. Investigation & Enforcement
The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) is the primary enforcing body.
HSE carries out inspections, issues improvement notices, and prosecutes breaches.
Asbestos cases often arise from worker complaints, routine inspections, or after illness reports.
7. Conclusion
Prosecutions for asbestos exposure offences in the UK emphasise rigorous compliance with management regulations and protection of workers and the public. Both companies and individuals can face severe penalties, including large fines, imprisonment, and disqualification.
RELATED Blog
0 comments