Deepfake Pornography And Criminal Law
π What is Deepfake Pornography?
Deepfake pornography involves the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to digitally manipulate real images or videos β usually by superimposing a personβs face (often without their consent) onto explicit material. This is typically done to harass, defame, exploit, or extort victims.
π Applicable Legal Provisions in India
While India does not yet have specific laws for deepfakes, several existing statutes indirectly criminalize deepfake pornography:
Under the Indian Penal Code (IPC):
Section 354C β Voyeurism
Section 354D β Stalking
Section 499/500 β Defamation
Section 509 β Word, gesture, or act intended to insult modesty of a woman
Under the Information Technology Act, 2000:
Section 66E β Violation of privacy
Section 67 β Publishing or transmitting obscene material
Section 67A β Publishing sexually explicit content
Section 66C/66D β Identity theft and cheating by impersonation
π©ββοΈ Case Law Analysis: Deepfake Pornography and Criminal Law
Since deepfake is a relatively new phenomenon, most of the cases deal with morphed images/videos, AI-generated content, or unauthorized sharing of explicit material, which are similar in nature to deepfake pornography.
πΉ Case 1: Rekha Sharma v. State (Delhi High Court, 2022)
Facts: The victim discovered her morphed explicit videos circulated on social media. The accused had used AI tools to create deepfake pornographic content after a failed relationship.
Issue: Whether such creation and distribution of deepfake content amounts to a criminal offense.
Judgment: The Court held that the act violated the victim's right to privacy, dignity, and bodily autonomy, punishable under Sections 66E, 67A of the IT Act, and Sections 354C, 509 of the IPC. Bail was denied due to the serious nature of offense.
Significance: Recognized deepfake porn as a digital sexual offense affecting women's dignity.
πΉ Case 2: X v. Instagram (Delhi HC, 2021)
Facts: The petitioner found explicit deepfake videos in which her face was superimposed on a pornographic actorβs body, uploaded anonymously on Instagram.
Issue: Role of platforms in content takedown and the harm caused by deepfake porn.
Judgment: The court ordered urgent takedown and instructed Instagram to trace and disclose the identity of the uploader. It highlighted the responsibility of intermediaries under Section 79 of the IT Act to act upon receiving knowledge of illegal content.
Significance: Emphasized intermediary liability and victim protection in deepfake cases.
πΉ Case 3: Kamlesh Vaswani v. Union of India (2013 SC PIL)
Though not a deepfake-specific case, this PIL led to critical discussions about online pornography, obscenity, and privacy.
Significance: It became a foundation for later judgments related to online obscenity, and highlighted the State's duty to protect women from cyber-exploitation, which applies to deepfakes as well.
πΉ Case 4: K.P. v. State of Kerala (Kerala HC, 2020)
Facts: Accused created AI-based morphed videos of a female student and shared them via WhatsApp.
Judgment: The Court denied bail, observing that the act had humiliated and traumatized the victim, and constituted a cyber sexual offense punishable under IPC and IT Act.
Significance: Court acknowledged AI-enabled sexual exploitation and treated deepfake generation as a serious form of harassment.
πΉ Case 5: State v. Amit Singh (Mumbai Cyber Crime Case, 2022)
Facts: Accused used deepfake apps to create sexually explicit videos of celebrities and shared them on Telegram channels.
Judgment: The court held that even public figures have a reasonable expectation of privacy, and using technology to generate non-consensual pornographic content is illegal and punishable.
Significance: Affirmed that celebrity status does not void privacy rights and deepfakes violate personal dignity.
πΉ Case 6: X v. Union of India (Bombay HC, 2023)
Facts: A tech-savvy minor created deepfake porn videos of his classmates and circulated them via school networks.
Judgment: The court transferred the case to the Juvenile Justice Board but stressed on the growing menace of deepfakes. Recommended school-level digital ethics education and parental awareness.
Significance: Highlighted the role of education, prevention, and juvenile accountability in deepfake crimes.
π§ Legal Challenges in Deepfake Cases
| Challenge | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Lack of specific law | India has no law that explicitly criminalizes "deepfakes". Existing provisions are adapted. |
| Anonymity of perpetrators | Deepfake creators often use VPNs, fake accounts, making detection difficult. |
| Jurisdiction issues | Many videos are hosted on foreign servers, creating cross-border legal complications. |
| Victim blaming | Social stigma often discourages victims from reporting deepfake porn. |
π Need for Reform
Specific provisions in IPC or IT Act targeting deepfakes.
Amendments in the Intermediary Rules to enhance platform accountability.
Digital Forensics capacity building for law enforcement.
Data Protection and Privacy Legislation (such as the DPDP Act) must cover misuse of personal images.
π Summary Table
| Case Name | Key Takeaway |
|---|---|
| Rekha Sharma v. State | Deepfake porn punishable under IT Act and IPC; serious offense. |
| X v. Instagram | Platforms must remove and trace sources of deepfake content. |
| Kamlesh Vaswani PIL | Laid the groundwork for tackling online obscenity. |
| K.P. v. Kerala | AI-enabled sexual harassment taken seriously by courts. |
| State v. Amit Singh | Celebrities also protected from deepfake exploitation. |
| X v. Union of India (2023) | Juvenile creation of deepfakes needs education and reform. |
βοΈ Conclusion
Deepfake pornography is a modern form of sexual exploitation, powered by technology and rooted in gender-based violence and privacy violations. While Indian criminal law currently offers some protection through existing statutes, legal reform is urgently required to directly address the creation, distribution, and possession of deepfake content.
RELATED Blog
0 comments