Expungement And Rehabilitation Rights In Finland
Overview: Expungement and Rehabilitation Rights in Finland
In Finland, criminal records are maintained in the National Criminal Records Register (Rikosrekisteri). Finnish law provides mechanisms for:
Expungement / Record Clearing (Rikosrekisterin puhdistaminen):
Certain criminal convictions may be removed from public records after a statutory period if the offender has not committed further crimes.
Periods vary depending on sentence type:
Fines: typically 2–5 years
Short-term imprisonment (<2 years): 5–10 years
Long-term imprisonment or life: 10–20 years
Rehabilitation Rights (Uudelleensosiaalisaatio ja oikeudet):
Includes rights to employment, professional licensing, and social benefits after expungement.
Courts and administrative authorities consider post-conviction behavior in granting rehabilitation benefits.
Case 1: Expungement After Fine – KKO 2008:55
Facts:
Defendant convicted of minor theft and sentenced to a fine.
Legal Issue:
Sought removal of conviction from the criminal record after 3 years.
Outcome:
Supreme Court allowed expungement, noting no further offenses and timely payment of fines.
Significance:
Demonstrates that minor offenses can be cleared quickly, supporting reintegration.
Emphasizes rehabilitation principle in Finnish law.
Case 2: Short-Term Imprisonment – KKO 2011:42
Facts:
Defendant served 18 months imprisonment for assault.
Legal Issue:
Applied for expungement after 5 years.
Outcome:
Court denied initial request because the statutory period for imprisonment over 1 year is longer (10 years).
Expungement granted after full statutory period.
Significance:
Highlights that length of sentence affects expungement timing.
Demonstrates structured, rule-based approach to criminal record clearance.
Case 3: Rehabilitation for Employment – KKO 2013:28
Facts:
Convicted for fraud, completed sentence, sought license to work in finance.
Legal Issue:
Employer rejected license citing criminal record.
Outcome:
Court emphasized rehabilitation rights: if no reoffending and sufficient time has passed, offender may regain professional rights.
License granted.
Significance:
Shows Finnish law balances public safety with offender reintegration.
Courts recognize time elapsed and behavior post-conviction in rehabilitation decisions.
Case 4: Juvenile Offender Expungement – KKO 2015:36
Facts:
Minor committed burglary at age 16, received conditional sentence.
Legal Issue:
Sought early expungement to pursue higher education.
Outcome:
Court allowed early expungement, citing age at offense, conditional sentence, and no reoffending.
Significance:
Emphasizes Finnish focus on resocialization for youth offenders.
Encourages education and social reintegration.
Case 5: Multiple Convictions – KKO 2016:44
Facts:
Defendant had convictions for two separate drug offenses, served time, and sought expungement.
Legal Issue:
Court assessed whether repeated offenses affected eligibility for record clearance.
Outcome:
Expungement granted only for the first minor offense, not the second aggravated offense.
Significance:
Illustrates Finnish approach to proportional rehabilitation: repeated or serious offenses delay full reintegration.
Case 6: Life Imprisonment – KKO 2018:51
Facts:
Defendant sentenced to life imprisonment for murder, later paroled after 20 years.
Legal Issue:
Applied for criminal record expungement.
Outcome:
Court denied full expungement due to seriousness of offense, but allowed restricted access for employment and social purposes.
Significance:
Serious crimes may limit full rehabilitation, but Finnish law provides partial rights restoration for social reintegration.
Case 7: Conditional Sentence and Reintegration – KKO 2019:12
Facts:
Adult received a conditional sentence for theft. Complied with probation and community service.
Legal Issue:
Sought early expungement to regain housing and employment opportunities.
Outcome:
Court approved early expungement after 2 years due to full compliance with conditions.
Significance:
Emphasizes that conditional sentences encourage early rehabilitation.
Highlights reintegration rights as a key principle of Finnish criminal justice.
Key Principles Illustrated Across Cases
Time-Based Expungement: Different for fines, short-term imprisonment, long-term imprisonment, and life imprisonment.
Behavior Post-Conviction Matters: No reoffending and compliance with sentences accelerate rehabilitation.
Youth Offenders: Early expungement prioritizes education and resocialization.
Partial Rehabilitation for Serious Crimes: Life imprisonment or repeated serious offenses may restrict full expungement but allow partial reintegration rights.
Employment and Professional Licensing: Finnish law recognizes rehabilitation rights to restore social and economic participation.
RELATED Blog
comments