Insult To National Symbols As An Offence
Insult to National Symbols: Overview
What Are National Symbols?
National symbols include the National Flag, National Anthem, Emblem, and other symbols that represent the sovereignty, unity, and identity of a nation. They hold deep emotional, cultural, and political significance.
Why Are National Symbols Protected by Law?
Respect for the nation: National symbols are a representation of the country’s dignity and sovereignty.
Unity and patriotism: Protecting symbols helps foster a sense of pride and unity.
Preventing disrespect: To maintain public order and prevent insult that might provoke unrest or offend citizens.
Legal Framework for Insulting National Symbols in India
Section 2 of the Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971: This law specifically criminalizes the insult to the National Flag and the National Anthem.
IPC Section 124A (Sedition) and other provisions: Sometimes used for acts disrespecting national integrity.
Offences under the Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971:
Disrespecting the National Flag: Burning, mutilating, defacing, or insulting the flag in public.
Disrespecting the National Anthem: Preventing its proper rendition or showing disrespect.
Important Aspects:
Public place: The insult must take place in a public context.
Intent: There must be intention or knowledge that the act would insult the national symbol.
Punishment: Includes imprisonment, fines, or both.
Landmark Case Law on Insult to National Symbols
1. Shyam Narayan Chouksey v. Union of India, AIR 1953 SC 19
Facts: The petitioner challenged the prevention of disrespect to the National Flag.
Held: The Supreme Court upheld the government’s right to prohibit acts that insult the National Flag.
Significance: Established the legal basis for protecting the National Flag from insult as an expression of the nation’s sovereignty.
2. Union of India v. Naveen Jindal (2004) 5 SCC 719
Facts: The issue was about the right to fly the National Flag at private residences and establishments.
Held: The Supreme Court held that every citizen has the right to fly the National Flag on specified days and that it should be done respectfully.
Significance: Recognized the right to display the flag but within guidelines to prevent insult or disrespect.
3. Bijoe Emmanuel v. State of Kerala, AIR 1987 SC 748
Facts: Students refused to sing the National Anthem citing religious beliefs.
Held: The Supreme Court ruled in favor of freedom of conscience and said there was no intention to insult the National Anthem.
Significance: Showed that the intention behind the act is crucial to determine whether it amounts to an insult.
4. S. Sakalley v. State of Karnataka, AIR 2009 SC 228
Facts: The accused was charged for disrespecting the National Flag.
Held: The Court reaffirmed the importance of respecting national symbols and held that insult to the flag is punishable.
Significance: Reiterated the state’s authority to penalize disrespect to national symbols.
5. Kerala High Court in Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal, AIR 2020 SC 616
Facts: The case involved the misuse and disrespect of the National Flag.
Held: The Supreme Court emphasized strict adherence to the Flag Code and upheld penalties for its misuse.
Importance: Affirmed that disrespect to national symbols is a serious offence and must be deterred.
6. S. R. Bommai v. Union of India, AIR 1994 SC 1918
Context: While primarily about federalism, this case also touched upon acts that affect the sovereignty and integrity of the nation.
Held: The Court underscored that acts insulting national symbols can affect the unity and sovereignty of India.
Significance: Connected insult to national symbols with threats to national unity.
7. Arun Jaitley v. Union of India (1984) – Flag Code Enforcement
Facts: The question was on the constitutionality of prohibiting flying the flag on private property.
Decision: The Court allowed the flying of the National Flag on private property with respect and dignity.
Impact: Allowed personal expression while maintaining respect for the flag.
Summary of Key Points:
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Offence | Disrespect or insult to National Flag, Anthem, etc. |
| Legal Provisions | Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971 |
| Intent Required | Yes, intention to insult is necessary |
| Punishment | Imprisonment and/or fines |
| Important Principle | Right to respect balanced with freedom of expression |
| Landmark Judgments | Emphasize protection, intent, and freedom balance |
Why Intent Matters?
Many cases show that mere act without intention to insult does not amount to an offence (e.g., Bijoe Emmanuel). This safeguards legitimate expression and freedom of conscience.
Final Notes:
Respect for national symbols is a matter of national pride.
Legal safeguards exist to prevent deliberate insult.
Judicial interpretation balances national interest with fundamental rights.
RELATED Blog
0 comments