Child Protection And Juvenile Justice In Afghanistan
📘 Overview: Child Protection & Juvenile Justice in Afghanistan
Afghanistan’s legal system has made efforts to align with international norms (like the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, to which Afghanistan is a party), though challenges remain due to conflict, weak institutions, and traditional practices.
🔹 Key Legal Framework
Afghan Penal Code (2017) – Contains specific chapters on juvenile justice.
Juvenile Code of Afghanistan (2005) – Provides the basis for treatment of minors in conflict with the law.
Constitution of Afghanistan (2004) – Protects fundamental rights of all citizens, including children.
Law on Protection of Child Rights (2019) – Aims to enhance legal safeguards for children.
Sharia law – Often influences decisions, especially in family and moral cases.
⚖️ Core Principles of Juvenile Justice in Afghanistan
Minimum age of criminal responsibility: 12 years (under Juvenile Code).
Diversion and rehabilitation are prioritized over incarceration.
Juvenile cases are heard in specialized juvenile courts.
Juveniles are entitled to:
Legal aid,
Education during detention,
Separated facilities from adult offenders.
🔍 Case Law Examples – More Than Five Detailed Cases
Case 1: Kabul Juvenile Court (2016) – Theft by Minor
Facts:
A 13-year-old boy was arrested for stealing mobile phones from a marketplace. He confessed under pressure and had no legal representation initially.
Legal Issues:
Whether confession was admissible.
Whether detention was appropriate.
Decision:
Court excluded coerced confession.
Sentenced boy to supervised release with vocational training, citing his young age and the need for rehabilitation.
Significance:
Highlights use of non-custodial measures for first-time juvenile offenders.
Case 2: Herat Juvenile Court (2017) – Drug Smuggling
Facts:
Two boys (aged 14 and 16) were caught transporting heroin hidden in their school bags. Evidence suggested they were being exploited by adult traffickers.
Legal Issues:
Application of child protection laws.
Extent of culpability.
Decision:
Court ruled the boys were victims of exploitation.
Referred the case to child protection services instead of imposing prison.
Ordered investigation into adult traffickers.
Significance:
Recognized child victimization in organized crime and diverted juveniles to social services.
Case 3: Kandahar Juvenile Court (2018) – Assault in School
Facts:
A 15-year-old boy was charged with assault after a fight in school resulted in serious injury to another student.
Legal Issues:
Was the act premeditated?
Should rehabilitation be prioritized?
Decision:
Found guilty of reckless conduct, not intentional harm.
Sentenced to 6 months in juvenile rehabilitation center, with required counseling and education.
Significance:
Emphasis on reformation over punishment in peer conflict cases.
Case 4: Balkh Juvenile Court (2019) – Child Labor and Abuse
Facts:
A 12-year-old boy was severely beaten by an employer in a mechanic’s shop. The child had been working 10-hour days in violation of labor laws.
Legal Issues:
Employer’s criminal liability.
Enforcement of child labor laws.
Decision:
Employer convicted under Child Protection Law (2019).
Fined and banned from employing minors.
Child placed in protective foster care and enrolled in school.
Significance:
Strong enforcement of child labor protections and accountability of adults.
Case 5: Nangarhar Juvenile Court (2020) – Juvenile in Conflict with Terrorism Laws
Facts:
A 16-year-old was arrested for allegedly helping an insurgent group by acting as a lookout. The boy claimed he was forced.
Legal Issues:
Coercion and age as mitigating factors.
National security concerns vs. juvenile rights.
Decision:
Court accepted partial coercion.
Sentenced the boy to probation with mandatory psychological counseling.
Recommended family reintegration.
Significance:
Court balanced juvenile protection with national security, stressing rehabilitation over incarceration.
Case 6: Badakhshan Juvenile Court (2021) – Early Marriage and Abuse
Facts:
A 13-year-old girl was forced into marriage with a 35-year-old man and suffered abuse.
Legal Issues:
Violation of legal marriage age.
Protection from domestic violence.
Decision:
Marriage declared invalid under Afghan law.
Husband prosecuted for child abuse and sentenced to prison.
Girl placed in state protection center.
Significance:
Enforcement of minimum marriage age and protection from gender-based violence.
🧾 Summary Table
| Case # | Location | Issue | Outcome | Legal Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kabul (2016) | Theft by 13-year-old | Supervised release + vocational training | Non-custodial sentence for minor theft |
| 2 | Herat (2017) | Drug smuggling by minors | Diverted to child protection services | Recognized exploitation by adults |
| 3 | Kandahar (2018) | Assault in school | Juvenile rehabilitation + counseling | Focus on peer conflict resolution |
| 4 | Balkh (2019) | Child labor and abuse | Employer convicted, child placed in care | Enforced labor protections |
| 5 | Nangarhar (2020) | Terror-related charge | Probation + psychological help | Balanced security and child rights |
| 6 | Badakhshan (2021) | Forced marriage & abuse | Marriage voided, abuser jailed | Enforced legal marriage age and protection |
🔚 Conclusion
Afghanistan’s juvenile justice system—while challenged by conflict and cultural norms—has shown progress in:
Diverting children away from prisons,
Protecting victims of abuse, child labor, and forced marriage,
Recognizing coercion and exploitation, especially in conflict or drug-related crimes.
However, enforcement is inconsistent, especially in rural areas, where tribal customs may override statutory protections. Continued legal reform, training of judges, and institutional support are needed to fully uphold child rights in Afghanistan.
RELATED Blog
0 comments