Criminal Liability For Mob Lynching Incidents
Criminal Liability for Mob Lynching Incidents
Definition
Mob lynching refers to an act where a group of people attack, assault, or kill an individual outside the judicial process, usually under the pretext of punishing them for alleged wrongdoing.
It is considered a serious criminal offense because:
It bypasses legal due process
Violates fundamental rights
Endangers public order and safety
Laws treat it as murder, rioting, unlawful assembly, or criminal conspiracy depending on the circumstances.
Applicable Legal Framework (India)
1. Indian Penal Code (IPC)
Section 302 IPC – Murder
Section 304 IPC – Culpable homicide not amounting to murder
Section 307 IPC – Attempt to murder
Section 323 IPC – Voluntarily causing hurt
Section 143 IPC – Unlawful assembly
Section 147 IPC – Rioting
Section 149 IPC – Every member of unlawful assembly guilty of offense committed in prosecution of common object
Section 120B IPC – Criminal conspiracy (if planned)
2. Special Provisions
Criminal Law Amendment Acts (2013, 2018) – Some states have specifically criminalized mob lynching with enhanced penalties.
State-specific laws – e.g., Maharashtra Prohibition of Lynching Act 2019 (proposed), similar acts in other states.
3. International Law / Human Rights Perspective
Violates Right to Life (Article 21, India)
Internationally condemned under Universal Declaration of Human Rights, ICCPR, and regional human rights conventions.
Key Elements of Offense
Participation in a mob – Group of people acting collectively.
Violent act against an individual – Assault, injury, or death.
Intent or common object – Punish or harm without legal sanction.
Planning or spontaneous action – Both criminally liable under IPC.
Connection to unlawful assembly – Section 149 IPC extends liability to all participants.
Case Law
Here are more than five significant illustrative cases:
1. Tehseen Poonawalla v. Union of India (Supreme Court, 2018)
Facts:
Public interest litigation after several mob lynching incidents over rumors of cow slaughter.
Held:
SC directed all states to ensure strict preventive and punitive action, including investigation under IPC Sections 302, 147, 148, 149.
Issued guidelines for timely investigation, registration of FIRs, and accountability of police.
Principle:
Mob lynching violates fundamental rights; strict criminal liability for participants.
2. Rahul v. State of Uttar Pradesh (Allahabad High Court, 2017)
Facts:
Group attacked a man suspected of theft; victim died on spot.
Held:
Court convicted perpetrators under Sections 302, 149 IPC.
Emphasized that all members of the mob are criminally liable even if they did not directly cause death.
Principle:
Liability extends to all members of unlawful assembly pursuing a common object.
3. State of Maharashtra v. Arun Kumar (Bombay High Court, 2019)
Facts:
Mob lynching over religious rumor in rural area; multiple participants.
Held:
Conviction under Sections 302, 147, 148, 149, 120B IPC for murder and conspiracy.
Court highlighted pre-planning and collective intent.
Principle:
Pre-arranged mob attacks attract additional charges like criminal conspiracy.
*4. State of Jharkhand v. Santosh Yadav (2016)
Facts:
Mob attacked a man over suspicion of cattle theft; victim survived but was seriously injured.
Held:
Conviction under Sections 307, 147, 149 IPC (attempt to murder, rioting).
Emphasized that even if death does not occur, serious bodily harm is criminally punishable.
Principle:
Attempted lynching or grievous injury carries severe criminal liability.
*5. Ramesh v. State of Karnataka (2018)
Facts:
Mob attacked an individual based on social media rumor; victim died.
Held:
Court convicted main perpetrators under Section 302 IPC; other participants under Sections 147 and 149 IPC.
Social media instigation recognized as part of planning.
Principle:
Digital incitement can establish common object of mob.
6. State of Haryana v. Mohan Lal (2015)
Facts:
Mob lynching of two men accused of theft; spontaneous gathering after rumor.
Held:
Conviction under Sections 302, 323, 147, 149 IPC.
Court ruled that even spontaneous lynching attracts full criminal liability.
Principle:
No requirement for formal planning; intent to participate is sufficient.
*7. State of Rajasthan v. Vijay Singh (Jaipur, 2020)
Facts:
Attack on individual allegedly practicing witchcraft; lynching in village.
Held:
Conviction under Sections 302, 120B, 149 IPC; death penalty considered for main accused.
Court highlighted that cultural superstition cannot justify mob violence.
Principle:
Criminal liability for lynching extends to cultural or ritualistic contexts.
Key Principles from Case Law
All members liable: Section 149 IPC ensures every participant in mob lynching is criminally liable.
Intent matters: Common object to cause harm suffices for criminal liability.
No justification: Vigilantism, rumors, or superstition cannot excuse criminal acts.
Digital incitement counts: Social media or digital messages can establish planning and intent.
Severity varies: Liability can range from grievous hurt to murder and conspiracy charges.
Conclusion
Mob lynching is a serious criminal offense under:
IPC Sections 302, 304, 307, 323, 143–149, 120B
State-specific anti-lynching laws in some states
Case law shows that:
Courts consistently hold all participants liable.
Both pre-planned and spontaneous mob violence are punishable.
Digital or social media instigation can enhance criminal liability.
RELATED Blog
comments