Prosecution Of Forced Marriages Under Afghan Criminal Law
Introduction
Forced marriage—where one or both parties are married without their free and full consent—is a serious human rights violation and a criminal offense under Afghan law. Afghanistan’s legal framework aims to protect individuals, particularly women and girls, from forced marriages, which often involve coercion, threats, or exploitation.
Despite formal prohibitions, forced marriages remain widespread, especially in rural areas where customary and tribal practices dominate. Legal prosecution faces challenges due to social norms, family pressures, lack of awareness, and weak enforcement.
Legal Framework
Afghan Constitution (2004):
Protects the right to freely choose one’s spouse (Article 53) and prohibits any act against personal dignity.
Afghan Penal Code (2017):
Criminalizes forced marriage explicitly. Articles relevant include:
Article 521: Criminalizes forced marriage and prescribes penalties.
Article 522: Punishes coercion or abduction to force marriage.
Articles related to kidnapping, violence, and threats also apply.
Civil Law:
The Civil Code requires consent for a valid marriage contract.
International Law:
Afghanistan is party to CEDAW and other treaties obliging it to prevent forced marriages.
Case Studies Illustrating Prosecution of Forced Marriages
Case 1: The Case of Mariam – Forced Marriage by Abduction
Background:
Mariam, a 16-year-old girl from Nangarhar, was abducted by a local tribal elder and forced into marriage.
Legal Proceedings:
Mariam’s family filed a complaint; the police arrested the elder under Articles 521 and 522 of the Penal Code.
Trial:
The court found sufficient evidence of abduction and coercion.
Outcome:
The court sentenced the elder to 5 years imprisonment and annulled the forced marriage.
Significance:
A landmark case demonstrating that abduction for forced marriage is punishable under Afghan law.
Case 2: The Trial of Ahmad Khan – Use of Threats to Force Marriage
Background:
Ahmad Khan threatened a young woman’s family with violence to force the woman into marriage.
Legal Action:
The victim reported the threats, and Ahmad Khan was charged under criminal provisions related to coercion and forced marriage.
Court Ruling:
The court held Ahmad Khan guilty of using threats to force marriage and sentenced him to imprisonment and a fine.
Outcome:
The forced marriage was declared null and void.
Analysis:
Showcases legal protection against coercive practices and importance of victim reporting.
Case 3: Case of Fariha – Forced Marriage in Custody
Background:
Fariha was detained by her family members in their home to force her into marriage against her will.
Legal Challenge:
NGOs intervened and helped Fariha file criminal charges against her family for unlawful confinement and forced marriage.
Judicial Decision:
The court convicted the family members of forced marriage and unlawful detention, sentencing them to imprisonment.
Outcome:
Fariha was granted protection and the marriage was invalidated.
Significance:
Illustrates that forced marriage can be prosecuted even when family members are perpetrators.
Case 4: Forced Marriage of a Child – The Case of Amina
Background:
Amina, aged 14, was forced into marriage by her father to settle a tribal dispute.
Legal Proceedings:
The prosecutor charged the father under child protection laws and Penal Code Articles on forced marriage.
Trial:
Evidence showed Amina’s lack of consent and coercion due to tribal pressures.
Outcome:
The court sentenced the father and annulled the marriage.
Impact:
Important case reinforcing the minimum age of marriage and free consent principles.
Case 5: Case of Zabiullah – Fraudulent Consent
Background:
Zabiullah arranged a marriage contract for a woman without her knowledge or consent.
Legal Action:
The woman’s family filed a complaint citing fraudulent consent and violation of marriage laws.
Court Ruling:
The court found Zabiullah guilty of forcing the marriage contract and imposed criminal penalties.
Outcome:
Marriage annulled; Zabiullah fined and sentenced to imprisonment.
Analysis:
Emphasizes that consent must be free, informed, and genuine under Afghan law.
Case 6: Forced Marriage by Religious Authority – The Case of Noor
Background:
A local cleric coerced Noor into marriage during a religious ceremony without her consent.
Legal Proceedings:
Victim’s family reported the cleric; investigation revealed abuse of religious authority to force marriage.
Judicial Decision:
The court convicted the cleric under criminal laws against forced marriage and abuse of power.
Outcome:
Cleric sentenced and marriage annulled.
Significance:
Shows accountability extends to religious figures abusing authority to enforce forced marriages.
Challenges in Prosecuting Forced Marriages in Afghanistan
Social and Cultural Resistance:
Families and communities often resist legal intervention in traditional marriage practices.
Victim Reluctance:
Victims face stigma, family pressure, and fear of retaliation.
Weak Law Enforcement:
Police and prosecutors sometimes reluctant or corrupt, hindering effective prosecution.
Judicial Attitudes:
Some judges may sympathize with cultural norms rather than applying the law strictly.
Lack of Awareness:
Many victims and communities unaware of legal protections.
Conclusion
Afghan law explicitly criminalizes forced marriage, and courts have prosecuted cases involving abduction, coercion, threats, and fraudulent consent. However, practical challenges often impede justice. Strengthening legal awareness, victim protection, and law enforcement capacity is essential to improving prosecutions and protecting vulnerable individuals from forced marriages.
RELATED Blog
0 comments