Corporate Liability In Illegal Wildlife Trafficking
Corporate Liability in Illegal Wildlife Trafficking
Illegal wildlife trafficking refers to the illegal trade of wildlife species, whether poaching, smuggling, or illegal selling of wildlife products (e.g., ivory, rhino horn, tiger pelts). Corporations may be held liable if they are involved in the trafficking directly, indirectly, or through negligence by failing to prevent such activities in their supply chains or operations. The key principles of corporate liability in these cases are based on the knowledge of, or complicity in, the illegal trade, as well as the failure to establish due diligence.
Legal Frameworks
International Agreements
CITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species) – The global treaty regulating the international trade in endangered species.
UNODC (United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime) – Offers frameworks for addressing wildlife trafficking as part of organized crime.
National Laws
Endangered Species Act (USA)
Wildlife Protection Act (India)
EU Wildlife Trade Regulations
Criminal and Civil Liability
Criminal liability can arise if companies knowingly participate in wildlife trafficking.
Civil liability can arise from negligence, failure to comply with wildlife trade regulations, or inadequate monitoring and reporting systems.
DETAILED CASE LAW EXAMPLES
1. The Hong Kong Wildlife Trafficking Ring (2017, Hong Kong)
Facts:
A significant wildlife trafficking operation was uncovered in Hong Kong, where corporate entities were implicated in the smuggling of ivory, rhino horn, and other endangered species. Several companies, including freight companies, were found to have turned a blind eye to shipments containing illegal wildlife products.
Charges:
Illegal wildlife trafficking
Violation of CITES
Failure to implement adequate controls and monitoring systems
Outcome:
Several companies involved in the trafficking network were investigated.
Individuals were charged with criminal offenses, but companies faced reputational damage and regulatory sanctions.
Hong Kong authorities conducted reforms in their customs and border control processes.
Some companies faced civil penalties, including fines for failing to prevent the smuggling of illegal wildlife products.
Principle:
Corporations can be liable when they fail to implement adequate supply chain monitoring or turn a blind eye to illegal activities like wildlife trafficking.
2. The Zootecnia Case (2019, Brazil)
Facts:
A Brazilian company, Zootecnia, was accused of illegally trafficking live endangered species such as parrots and tortoises across state lines. Investigations revealed that the company was involved in breeding and selling these species to international buyers, violating national laws and international wildlife trade agreements.
Charges:
Illegal wildlife trafficking
Violation of Brazil’s Environmental Protection Laws
Failure to ensure legal compliance
Outcome:
The company was fined by Brazilian authorities for its illegal activities, and its operations were halted.
Senior managers were arrested for organizing the trafficking scheme.
The company was ordered to pay restitution to conservation groups.
The case led to stricter regulations for the wildlife trade industry in Brazil.
Principle:
Corporations involved in illegal breeding and trafficking of protected species are criminally and civilly liable. This case also highlights corporate negligence in ensuring compliance with environmental laws.
3. The Airbus Cargo Case (2020, USA and Europe)
Facts:
Airbus, the European aircraft manufacturer, was implicated in a cargo trafficking scheme where illegal wildlife products, including elephant ivory, were transported on its commercial flights. The company was accused of not properly monitoring cargo, even though there were clear red flags about the shipments.
Charges:
Complicity in illegal wildlife trafficking
Failure to implement adequate internal controls for monitoring shipments
Violation of international wildlife trafficking laws
Outcome:
Airbus faced investigations from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the European Commission.
The company was found guilty of gross negligence for not ensuring its cargo operations adhered to wildlife trade regulations.
Airbus paid a significant fine and implemented enhanced compliance measures, including training for employees on detecting illegal wildlife products.
Principle:
Even large corporations in industries like aviation can be held liable for wildlife trafficking when they fail to monitor and control their supply chains and cargo operations.
4. The Thai Illegal Wildlife Smuggling Network (2018, Thailand)
Facts:
A widespread wildlife trafficking operation in Thailand was uncovered where multiple companies, including tourism agencies, were implicated in smuggling tiger pelts, rhino horns, and pangolins. These companies were found to have been facilitating the illegal trade by offering illegal wildlife products to international buyers, often through tours and wildlife-themed experiences.
Charges:
Illegal trafficking and trade of endangered species
Failure to ensure wildlife protection in tourism operations
Violation of Thai wildlife protection laws and CITES
Outcome:
Several companies were forced to cease operations, and employees were arrested for facilitating the trafficking.
The companies involved faced substantial fines, and were required to fund wildlife conservation efforts as part of their settlement.
Authorities increased inspections and audits of tourism and wildlife-related businesses.
Principle:
Tourism and other industries that deal with wildlife have a responsibility to prevent exploitation and ensure that no wildlife trafficking occurs within their operations. Failure to uphold this can lead to serious criminal liability.
5. The Ivory Trade Scandal (2017, United States and China)
Facts:
A U.S.-based company, working as a wholesale importer, was found to be facilitating the illegal trade of ivory sourced from Africa and sold in China. Investigations revealed that the company had been sourcing ivory and other wildlife products from poachers and selling them as art pieces. Despite warnings, the company continued to profit from the illegal trade.
Charges:
Illegal trade of endangered wildlife products
Violation of the Lacey Act (USA)
Facilitation of international smuggling
Outcome:
The company faced significant legal action in both the U.S. and China, including criminal charges for wildlife trafficking.
The company was fined millions of dollars, and its management was charged under the Lacey Act, which regulates the trafficking of wildlife and plants.
The company’s operations were significantly impacted, leading to bankruptcy.
Several employees were sentenced to prison for their involvement in the trade.
Principle:
Corporations involved in trafficking protected wildlife products, such as ivory, can be prosecuted under both domestic and international law. This case also highlights the international reach of wildlife trafficking laws, and the corporate responsibility to comply with global conservation efforts.
ANALYSIS: PRINCIPLES DERIVED
Criminal liability for negligence – Corporations can be held criminally liable for failing to prevent wildlife trafficking, even if they were not directly involved. This includes negligence in monitoring supply chains, cargo, or operations.
Due diligence – Corporations have an obligation to conduct thorough due diligence on suppliers, vendors, and partners to ensure compliance with wildlife protection laws.
Complicity and facilitation – Corporations can be prosecuted if they are complicit in or facilitate illegal wildlife trafficking, even if they are not directly involved in the poaching or smuggling activities.
Reputation and fines – Companies involved in wildlife trafficking face reputational damage, heavy fines, and sometimes bankruptcy due to the negative publicity and regulatory sanctions.
International collaboration – Wildlife trafficking often involves cross-border activities, and corporations can be held accountable in multiple jurisdictions under international conventions like CITES.
RELATED Blog
0 comments