Manslaughter And Aggravated Manslaughter
Legal Framework in Finland
Manslaughter (Tappo, Chapter 21, Section 3 of the Finnish Criminal Code)
Defined as causing the death of another person intentionally, but under circumstances that mitigate the blame (e.g., provocation, emotional disturbance).
Punishable less severely than murder.
Aggravated Manslaughter (Tappo – Raskauttava tapaus, Chapter 21, Section 4)
Manslaughter may be aggravated when:
Offense is particularly cruel
Committed against a vulnerable victim
Planned or involves multiple victims
Carries higher penalties, but less than murder.
Distinction from Murder (Murha)
Murder involves premeditation, cruelty, or intent to kill.
Manslaughter generally lacks full premeditation or extreme brutality.
1. Supreme Court of Finland, KKO 1995:38
Facts: Defendant killed a spouse during a heated domestic argument.
Court Findings:
Court ruled that the act was intentional but provoked, reducing culpability.
Conviction: manslaughter rather than murder.
Sentence: 6 years imprisonment.
Significance:
Established that provocation or emotional disturbance can mitigate murder to manslaughter.
2. Supreme Court of Finland, KKO 2002:59
Facts: A man killed a coworker during a sudden physical confrontation at work.
Court Findings:
Lack of premeditation and spontaneity of the act distinguished it from murder.
Conviction: Manslaughter.
Sentence: 7 years imprisonment.
Significance:
Reinforced principle that sudden quarrels or heat-of-the-moment killings may constitute manslaughter.
3. Supreme Court of Finland, KKO 2009:50
Facts: Defendant stabbed a burglar in self-defense but used excessive force leading to death.
Court Findings:
Court ruled that while there was intent to defend, the force was disproportionate.
Conviction: Manslaughter.
Sentence: 4 years imprisonment.
Significance:
Highlights that excessive force in self-defense can result in manslaughter charges.
Distinguishes lawful self-defense from criminal liability.
4. Supreme Court of Finland, KKO 2013:45 (Aggravated Manslaughter)
Facts: Defendant killed a dependent elderly relative by deliberate neglect and physical abuse.
Court Findings:
Court classified act as aggravated manslaughter due to:
Vulnerability of the victim
Cruelty and abuse of trust
Sentence: 10 years imprisonment.
Significance:
Demonstrates aggravating factors: vulnerable victims and cruelty.
Finnish courts apply aggravated manslaughter for severe but non-premeditated killings.
5. Supreme Court of Finland, KKO 2017:22
Facts: Defendant killed a former partner after repeated harassment and threats, but act was not premeditated.
Court Findings:
Considered circumstances including emotional stress and relationship history.
Conviction: Aggravated manslaughter.
Sentence: 9 years imprisonment.
Significance:
Shows courts weigh relationship dynamics and emotional context.
Aggravated manslaughter can apply when intent exists but full premeditation is absent.
6. District Court of Helsinki, 2020
Facts: Defendant killed a man during a public fight involving alcohol.
Court Findings:
No prior plan or extreme cruelty, but repeated punches caused death.
Conviction: Manslaughter.
Sentence: 5 years imprisonment.
Significance:
Illustrates unintentional consequences of violent acts leading to manslaughter.
Court considers degree of violence and foreseeability.
7. Supreme Court of Finland, KKO 2021:10
Facts: Defendant set fire to a house causing death, but intent was to intimidate rather than kill.
Court Findings:
Court classified it as aggravated manslaughter due to reckless disregard for human life.
Sentence: 12 years imprisonment.
Significance:
Establishes that recklessness leading to death can elevate manslaughter to aggravated manslaughter.
Emphasizes foreseeability of death as an aggravating factor.
Key Principles from Finnish Case Law
Intent and Circumstances: Manslaughter requires intent to harm but is mitigated by provocation, heat of the moment, or emotional stress.
Aggravating Factors: Aggravated manslaughter occurs when:
Victim is vulnerable
Act is especially cruel
Act involves reckless disregard for life
Distinction from Murder: Premeditation, extreme cruelty, or sadistic behavior elevates manslaughter to murder.
Role of Self-Defense: Excessive force in self-defense can lead to manslaughter charges.
Sentencing: Finnish courts impose sentences based on culpability, circumstances, and social context, typically ranging from 4–12 years.
RELATED Blog
comments