Metadata As Evidence
What is Metadata?
Metadata is data that provides information about other data. For example, in digital communications, metadata includes:
Date and time a file or message was created or sent
Sender and receiver details (email addresses, phone numbers)
Location data (IP addresses, GPS coordinates)
File size, format, and device information
Unlike content data (actual message or document content), metadata reveals contextual and circumstantial details.
Why is Metadata Important in Legal Proceedings?
Metadata helps establish authenticity, timing, and source of digital evidence.
It can corroborate or refute claims related to the communication or digital transactions.
Courts rely on metadata to prove the chain of custody, authorship, and alterations in digital evidence.
Legal Framework for Admissibility of Metadata in India
Section 65A & 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872:
Governs the admissibility of electronic records and digital evidence.
Section 65B requires a certification by the person in charge of the device/system that the electronic record was produced in the ordinary course of business.
Information Technology Act, 2000:
Supports the use of electronic records and digital signatures.
Key Principles for Metadata Evidence
Authenticity: Metadata must be shown to be original and untampered.
Reliability: Should come from a trustworthy source or device.
Certification: Under Section 65B, metadata needs certification for admissibility.
Relevance: Metadata should be relevant to the facts in dispute.
Important Case Laws on Metadata as Evidence
1. Anvar P.V. v. P.K. Basheer, (2014) 10 SCC 473
Facts: The Supreme Court dealt with the admissibility of electronic evidence and emphasized Section 65B of the Evidence Act.
Held: Without compliance with Section 65B, electronic evidence including metadata cannot be admitted.
Significance: Metadata must be accompanied by proper certification for admissibility.
2. State (NCT of Delhi) v. Navjot Singh Sidhu, (2005) 11 SCC 600
Facts: The Court considered the authenticity of voice recordings and their metadata.
Held: Emphasized the need to verify the metadata to prove that the electronic record is original and unaltered.
Significance: Underlined that metadata plays a crucial role in verifying digital recordings.
3. B. N. Shyam Kumar v. The Inspector of Police, (2019) SCC OnLine SC 498
Facts: The appellant challenged the use of call data records (CDRs) as evidence.
Held: The Supreme Court held that metadata in the form of CDRs is admissible if accompanied by proper certification under Section 65B.
Significance: CDRs metadata is vital evidence in cybercrime and criminal trials.
4. Lily Thomas v. Union of India, AIR 2013 SC 399
Facts: The case involved examination of electronic evidence in public interest litigation.
Held: Emphasized that metadata and electronic evidence must be scrutinized for authenticity before admission.
Significance: Reinforced the rigorous approach courts must take in admitting digital evidence.
5. K.T. Ravindran v. Union of India, AIR 2021 SC 1320
Facts: Dispute over alleged digital manipulation in evidence submission.
Held: Court recognized the role of metadata to detect alterations or tampering in digital documents.
Significance: Metadata can serve as a forensic tool to ensure evidence integrity.
6. United States v. Microsoft Corp., 2006
Facts: Although a U.S. case, this dealt with metadata in emails during investigation.
Held: Courts examined metadata to establish the timeline and origin of emails.
Significance: International precedent on metadata’s evidentiary value.
Practical Application of Metadata in Evidence
Email Evidence: Metadata can prove the sender, recipient, and timestamps.
Call Data Records: Metadata showing call logs, duration, and location.
Photographs and Videos: Metadata reveals creation date, device info, and location.
Documents: Metadata shows document edits, authorship, and version history.
Social Media: Metadata helps track posting times and device usage.
Summary Table
| Case Name | Legal Principle | Importance of Metadata |
|---|---|---|
| Anvar P.V. v. P.K. Basheer | Section 65B Evidence Act compliance | Certification needed for electronic evidence including metadata |
| Navjot Singh Sidhu case | Authenticity of recordings | Metadata confirms originality and no tampering |
| B.N. Shyam Kumar case | Admissibility of CDRs | Call records metadata valid if certified |
| Lily Thomas case | Scrutiny of digital evidence | Metadata must be verified before admission |
| K.T. Ravindran case | Forensic use to detect tampering | Metadata detects alterations in evidence |
| US v. Microsoft (US case) | Metadata timeline in email evidence | Establishes timeline and source of digital communication |
Conclusion
Metadata is a powerful and indispensable component of digital evidence. Indian courts insist on strict compliance with Section 65B of the Evidence Act for admissibility. Metadata helps establish the authenticity, reliability, and integrity of electronic records and is essential in modern forensic analysis and cybercrime investigations.
RELATED Blog
0 comments