Tourism Crimes Prosecuted In Chinese Courts

1. Telecom Fraud Using Tourism as a Cover

Facts: A person, Tang, used “tourism” as a pretext to leave China. Once abroad, he joined a telecom fraud ring targeting victims in China. Tang facilitated money laundering and disguised transfers of funds.

Charges: Fraud and illegal border crossing.

Court Findings: The court found that Tang abused the tourism system to commit cross-border crimes. The pretext of tourism did not protect him from criminal liability.

Outcome: Tang was sentenced to six years in prison and fined. The case serves as an example of how authorities treat tourism-based cover for serious fraud.

2. Injury Caused by Wild Monkeys at Emei Mountain

Facts: A tourist, Zhang, ignored warning signs in a macaque monkey area and was bitten. The injury required medical treatment.

Legal Arguments: The court considered both Zhang’s responsibility to heed safety warnings and the scenic area’s duty to provide safe conditions.

Outcome: The parties settled through mediation. Zhang received compensation for medical expenses.

Legal Significance: Demonstrates civil liability in tourist sites and the principle that tourists share responsibility for personal safety while scenic areas must maintain reasonable safety measures.

3. Swing Bridge Accident in a Scenic Area

Facts: Tourist Zhu fell from a swinging bridge attraction during a guided tour. He suffered a serious fracture.

Legal Arguments: The court evaluated the tour company’s duty of care and Zhu’s contributory negligence for participating in a risky activity.

Outcome: Liability was apportioned 80% to the tour company and 20% to Zhu. Zhu received compensation for medical costs, disability, and related losses.

Legal Significance: Establishes how courts allocate liability between tourist operators and participants in high-risk activities.

4. Ecological Damage Caused by Tourist Fire

Facts: Tourists in a protected scenic area caused a fire that damaged the environment.

Legal Arguments: Under civil and environmental law, tourists have a duty to avoid harming public ecological resources.

Outcome: The court held the tourists liable for restoration and compensation for environmental damage.

Legal Significance: Highlights how Chinese courts enforce environmental protection even when tourists are involved.

5. Fatal Fall at the Great Wall

Facts: Tourist Chen slipped and fell during a group tour, resulting in fatal injuries.

Legal Arguments: Liability of the tour company and scenic area for safety measures and timely medical response was examined.

Outcome: Chen’s family received compensation for medical costs, funeral expenses, and loss of support.

Legal Significance: Shows how courts handle fatal tourist accidents and the responsibilities of tour operators and scenic management.

6. Unlicensed Tour Operator Fraud

Facts: An individual operated a tour business without a license, collected money for overseas tours, but did not sign contracts or provide services as promised.

Charges: Administrative violations for unlicensed business operation.

Outcome: The operator was fined, and illegal income was confiscated.

Legal Significance: Demonstrates enforcement against unlicensed tourism operations, protecting tourists from fraud.

7. Tourist Fraud Using Online Booking Platforms

Facts: A group of tourists booked luxury tours through a fraudulent online platform. The operator took payments and disappeared, leaving tourists stranded.

Charges: Fraud and illegal business operations.

Court Findings: Courts found that the operator intentionally misled tourists to extract funds.

Outcome: The operator was sentenced to prison and ordered to compensate the victims.

Legal Significance: Highlights the growing intersection of tourism and online fraud and criminal liability for operators exploiting tourists.

Key Patterns Across These Cases:

Civil and Criminal Liability: Tourism crimes in China include both civil torts (injury, environmental damage) and criminal acts (fraud, illegal border crossing).

Tourist Responsibility: Courts often consider the tourist’s own negligence or assumption of risk.

Operator / Scenic Area Duty: High duty of care is required in tourist sites, especially in high-risk activities or ecologically sensitive areas.

Regulatory Enforcement: Unlicensed tourism operations can lead to administrative penalties or criminal prosecution.

Cross-Border Fraud Awareness: Using tourism as a cover for fraud or money laundering is treated very seriously.

LEAVE A COMMENT