Child Labour And Criminal Liability
What is Child Labour?
Child labour refers to the employment of children in any work that deprives them of their childhood, interferes with their ability to attend regular school, and is mentally, physically, socially, or morally harmful.
Legal Prohibition
Various laws prohibit child labour. In India, the Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986 prohibits the employment of children below the age of 14 in certain hazardous occupations and regulates their work in others.
Criminal Liability
Employers or persons who employ children in violation of these laws can be held criminally liable. The law imposes penalties such as fines and imprisonment for those who contravene provisions prohibiting child labour.
Key Elements of Criminal Liability in Child Labour Cases:
Employing a Child Below the Legal Age: The accused knowingly employs or allows a child to work.
Hazardous or Prohibited Occupation: Employment in sectors or activities banned for child labour.
Failure to Comply With Regulation: Not adhering to conditions or limits set by law.
Mens Rea (Intent or Knowledge): The employer’s knowledge or intention to exploit child labour.
Important Case Laws on Child Labour and Criminal Liability
1. M.C. Mehta vs. State of Tamil Nadu (1996) — Child Labour Case
Facts: M.C. Mehta, a noted public interest litigant, filed a petition challenging the employment of children in hazardous industries like match factories.
Judgment: The Supreme Court banned the employment of children below 14 years in hazardous industries.
Significance: This case strengthened the ban on child labour in hazardous conditions and emphasized the state’s obligation to protect children’s rights.
Criminal Liability Aspect: The judgment also directed authorities to enforce penalties against offenders.
2. Rajasthan State and Others vs. Union of India (1996)
Facts: This PIL was filed against the employment of children in hazardous industries in Rajasthan.
Judgment: The Supreme Court ordered a complete ban on child labour in hazardous occupations, affirming the constitutional right of children to live with dignity.
Criminal Liability Aspect: It reinforced the criminal penalties under the Child Labour Act, directing strict action against violators.
Significance: Highlighted the duty of the state to actively monitor and enforce laws prohibiting child labour.
3. Bachpan Bachao Andolan vs. Union of India (2011)
Facts: A petition was filed by an NGO demanding stricter enforcement of child labour laws and better rehabilitation.
Judgment: The Supreme Court held that child labour is a violation of fundamental rights and called for stronger enforcement mechanisms.
Criminal Liability Aspect: The court emphasized the criminal prosecution of employers and intermediaries exploiting child labour.
Significance: Urged the government to amend laws and increase penalties for violations.
4. Shahdara Child Labour Case (Delhi High Court, 1996)
Facts: Children working in hazardous conditions in Shahdara area were rescued.
Judgment: The court ordered immediate release of children and criminal proceedings against employers.
Criminal Liability Aspect: The court held the employers criminally liable for violating the Child Labour Act.
Significance: This case set a precedent for swift rescue and punishment of offenders.
5. Lakshmi Kant Pandey vs. Union of India (1984)
Facts: Petition regarding the employment of children below 14 years in various industries.
Judgment: The Supreme Court held that the right to education and development is fundamental and child labour deprives children of this right.
Criminal Liability Aspect: The court underscored the need to prosecute violators of child labour laws.
Significance: Recognized the constitutional dimension of the child labour issue.
Summary of Criminal Liability under Child Labour Laws:
Employers can be penalized with imprisonment (up to 6 months to 2 years depending on the law) and fines.
Repeat offenders face enhanced penalties.
Police and labour inspectors have the authority to inspect workplaces and take action.
Courts emphasize rehabilitation of rescued children alongside penal action against employers.
RELATED Blog
0 comments