Digital Rights Of Children
⚖️ 1. J.K. v. Facebook (Ireland, 2021)
Facts:
In this case, a teenage girl from Northern Ireland sued Facebook after a fake profile was created using her photos and information, including suggestive and misleading content. The girl claimed that Facebook failed to promptly take down the harmful content and violated her right to privacy.
Legal Issues:
Violation of data protection rights (GDPR)
Duty of care of platforms towards minors
Emotional distress caused by misuse of digital platforms
Judgment:
The Irish court recognized that platforms like Facebook have a heightened responsibility when it comes to children. The court emphasized the importance of proactive monitoring and quick response to harmful content involving minors. Though Facebook ultimately took down the fake profile, the delay was seen as unacceptable.
Importance:
Reinforced the platform’s duty of care to protect minors from online abuse.
Highlighted the right to privacy and dignity of children in digital spaces.
Strengthened calls for age-appropriate design codes.
⚖️ 2. Sabu Mathew George v. Union of India (2015 & 2017) – India
Facts:
This PIL (Public Interest Litigation) was filed against search engines like Google, Yahoo, and Microsoft for displaying advertisements and content related to prenatal sex determination, which is illegal in India under the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (PCPNDT) Act, 1994. The concern was that such advertisements promoted female foeticide, violating the rights of the girl child.
Legal Issues:
Protection of children’s rights even before birth
Responsibility of digital platforms to not promote illegal content
Balancing free speech and child rights
Judgment:
The Supreme Court of India ordered search engines to block advertisements and information promoting sex selection techniques. It emphasized the role of intermediaries in ensuring that illegal and harmful content does not proliferate online.
Importance:
Highlighted digital responsibility towards unborn children.
Placed legal accountability on tech giants to comply with local laws.
Recognized the state’s duty to ensure a safe digital environment for children.
⚖️ 3. Google Spain SL v. Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (2014) – Right to be Forgotten
Facts:
Although not specifically about a child, this case laid the groundwork for children’s “right to be forgotten”. A Spanish citizen demanded that Google remove links to a newspaper article that disclosed a past financial issue, which was no longer relevant.
Legal Issues:
Right to be forgotten under the EU Data Protection Directive
Balancing the right to privacy with freedom of information
Judgment:
The European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled in favor of the individual, establishing the "right to be forgotten". This meant individuals, including children, could request the removal of outdated or irrelevant information from search engines.
Importance for Children:
Children are especially vulnerable to permanent digital footprints.
The ruling has been extended to minors, allowing them to erase digital content that may harm their future prospects.
Recognized the need for strong data protection frameworks for children.
⚖️ 4. Campbell v. MGN Ltd. (2004) – UK House of Lords
Facts:
Naomi Campbell, a public figure, sued a British newspaper for publishing photographs of her leaving a Narcotics Anonymous meeting, violating her privacy. Though not a child, the case set important standards for privacy rights applicable to minors as well.
Legal Issues:
Invasion of privacy vs. public interest
Use of private images in the media
Judgment:
The House of Lords ruled in favor of Campbell, stating that even public figures have a right to privacy, especially regarding sensitive personal information. This judgment established that media must respect individual privacy, especially for children who are not public figures.
Importance for Children:
Laid a foundation for children's right to privacy in media and online.
Courts now routinely protect minors’ identities in sensitive cases.
Influenced online protections against doxxing and exposure of minors.
⚖️ 5. UN Committee on the Rights of the Child – General Comment No. 25 (2021)
Context:
This is not a court case but a landmark interpretation of the UNCRC regarding children's rights in the digital environment. It acts as guidance for governments and courts in upholding child rights online.
Key Points:
Emphasizes equal access to the internet for all children
Protects children’s rights to privacy, freedom of expression, and protection from online abuse
Calls for age-appropriate digital content, parental controls, and digital literacy
Impact:
Though not legally binding, this comment has been used by courts and policymakers around the world to shape laws.
Encourages states to ensure digital platforms are child-friendly and compliant with rights-based approaches.
Pushes for legal reforms, including data minimization, default privacy settings, and education.
📌 Summary of Key Digital Rights for Children:
| Right | Description | Case Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Right to Privacy | Children have the right to control personal data and avoid exploitation | J.K. v. Facebook, Campbell v. MGN |
| Right to Be Forgotten | Children can request removal of digital traces that harm them | Google Spain v. AEPD |
| Right to Protection from Harm | Platforms must shield children from abuse, exploitation, and illegal content | Sabu Mathew George v. UOI |
| Right to Digital Education & Access | Equal opportunity to participate in digital spaces | General Comment No. 25 |
| Right to Participation | Children’s views must be considered in digital policy-making | General Comment No. 25 |
RELATED Blog
0 comments