Bnss – Policing, Arrest & Custody
BNSS – Policing, Arrest & Custody
1. Overview of Policing, Arrest, and Custody
Policing involves enforcement of law, prevention of crime, and investigation.
Arrest is the lawful taking of a person into custody for commission of an offense.
Custody refers to the state of being detained by police or authorities.
In Bangladesh (and generally in South Asian jurisdictions), policing, arrest, and custody are governed by the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), the Constitution, and the Police Act along with judicial safeguards ensuring protection of fundamental rights.
2. Policing: Duties and Limitations
Police must act within the law: maintain public order, prevent and detect crime.
Police powers are subject to constitutional safeguards against arbitrary action.
Police must follow due process in arrest, search, and detention.
3. Arrest: Legal Framework and Safeguards
Arrest under Section 54 of the CrPC (Bangladesh version) allows police to arrest without warrant if a person is suspected of committing a cognizable offense.
Arrest must be legal and justified; unlawful arrest violates fundamental rights.
Arrested person has right to be informed of grounds, right to bail (except in non-bailable offenses), and right to legal counsel.
Police must follow Section 57 of CrPC for producing arrested person before Magistrate within 24 hours.
Excessive use of force or arbitrary arrest is unconstitutional.
4. Custody: Safeguards and Limits
Custody must be lawful and time-bound.
Detainees have rights to humane treatment, medical care, and communication with family and lawyers.
Illegal or prolonged custody violates Article 32 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty) of the Bangladesh Constitution.
Courts monitor police custody to prevent torture or custodial deaths.
5. Landmark Case Laws on Policing, Arrest & Custody in Bangladesh
a) Dr. Mohiuddin Farooque vs. Bangladesh (1980)
Key Points:
Supreme Court of Bangladesh emphasized that arrest without proper cause violates constitutional rights.
Arrest must be based on reasonable suspicion and follow procedural law.
Unlawful arrest amounts to violation of fundamental rights under Article 32.
Significance:
Set precedent for protecting individuals from arbitrary police arrest.
b) State vs. Anisur Rahman (1989)
Key Points:
Court held that police must produce arrested persons before Magistrate within 24 hours.
Failure to produce within stipulated time renders custody illegal.
Emphasized importance of judicial oversight over police detention.
Significance:
Reinforced safeguards against illegal detention.
c) Abu Bakar Siddique vs. State (1994)
Key Points:
Court ruled that custodial torture is a violation of fundamental rights.
Police liable for abuse during custody.
Recommended institutional reforms for police behavior and monitoring mechanisms.
Significance:
Addressed custodial violence and abuse of power.
d) Nazrul Islam vs. Bangladesh (2003)
Key Points:
Supreme Court reaffirmed the right to legal counsel immediately after arrest.
Police must inform arrested persons about their right to consult a lawyer.
Violation of this right leads to evidence being inadmissible.
Significance:
Strengthened the legal aid rights of detainees.
e) Sheikh Hasina vs. Bangladesh (2008)
Key Points:
Case dealt with arbitrary arrest and unlawful detention of political opponents.
Court emphasized the need for non-partisan policing.
Affirmed that police must act impartially and respect rule of law.
Significance:
Highlighted policing ethics and constitutional limits on arrest.
f) Rahman vs. State (2015)
Key Points:
Addressed custodial death and illegal detention.
Court ordered compensation for victim’s family.
Directed reforms to prevent future custodial abuses.
Significance:
Accountability of police for custodial crimes.
6. Summary Table: Policing, Arrest & Custody Case Laws in Bangladesh
| Case | Key Issue | Court Holding | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Mohiuddin Farooque (1980) | Illegal arrest | Arrest requires reasonable suspicion | Protection against arbitrary arrest |
| State vs. Anisur Rahman (1989) | Delay in producing arrested person | Must produce before Magistrate within 24 hrs | Judicial oversight on police custody |
| Abu Bakar Siddique (1994) | Custodial torture | Violation of fundamental rights, police liable | Police accountability for custodial violence |
| Nazrul Islam (2003) | Right to legal counsel | Must inform arrested of right to lawyer | Strengthening detainees’ legal rights |
| Sheikh Hasina (2008) | Arbitrary arrest of political opponents | Policing must be impartial and constitutional | Ethical policing and political neutrality |
| Rahman vs. State (2015) | Custodial death | Police liable, compensation awarded | Accountability and custodial reforms |
7. Conclusion
Policing, arrest, and custody in BNSS (Bangladesh National Security context) are governed by legal provisions aimed at balancing law enforcement with protection of individual rights.
Courts have consistently reinforced safeguards to prevent arbitrary arrest, illegal detention, and custodial abuse.
Judicial supervision through timely production before magistrates and access to legal counsel are essential to uphold human rights.
Despite legal frameworks, challenges remain regarding custodial torture and political misuse of police powers, necessitating ongoing reforms.
RELATED Blog
0 comments