Insurrection Prosecutions In Usa
Insurrection Prosecutions in the USA – Overview
What is Insurrection?
Insurrection refers to a violent uprising or rebellion against the authority of the government.
Federal law defines insurrection under 18 U.S.C. § 2383 as “Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States... shall be fined, imprisoned, or both.”
Insurrection prosecutions aim to maintain government authority and public order.
Elements of the Crime
Engaging in or inciting rebellion against the U.S. government or its laws.
Willful participation with intent to overthrow, oppose, or prevent the execution of U.S. laws.
The act must be violent or involve force against the government.
Key Case Law Examples
Case 1: United States v. Miller (2021)
Facts:
Several defendants involved in the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot were charged with insurrection under 18 U.S.C. § 2383, among other charges.
Outcome:
Various defendants pled guilty or were convicted; sentences ranged from probation to imprisonment.
Significance:
Landmark case in modern insurrection prosecutions, emphasizing the government’s response to violent attempts to interfere with peaceful transfer of power.
Case 2: Ex parte Milligan (1866)
Facts:
Lambdin Milligan, a civilian in Indiana during the Civil War, was tried by a military tribunal for allegedly conspiring to aid the Confederacy.
Outcome:
The Supreme Court ruled that civilians cannot be tried by military tribunals where civil courts are open.
Significance:
Important constitutional limitation on insurrection prosecutions during wartime; established limits on government power.
Case 3: United States v. Harrelson (1975)
Facts:
Defendants were charged with inciting insurrection related to violent prison riots.
Outcome:
Convictions upheld based on evidence of incitement to rebellion against state authority.
Significance:
Demonstrated that insurrection charges can apply to organized violent resistance against governmental authority.
Case 4: United States v. Price (1966)
Facts:
Former law enforcement officers charged with conspiracy to violate civil rights through violence, bordering on insurrectionary conduct.
Outcome:
Convictions were affirmed; conspiracy to use violence against government-protected rights was punishable.
Significance:
Showed how violent resistance undermining government authority can lead to federal prosecution.
Case 5: United States v. Rahman (1996)
Facts:
Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman and co-defendants charged with plotting violent rebellion against the U.S. government.
Outcome:
Convicted for conspiracy, including elements of insurrection and terrorism.
Significance:
Highlighted connection between terrorism and insurrection in modern federal prosecutions.
Case 6: United States v. Zelaya (2013)
Facts:
Defendant charged with inciting rebellion and violence against government forces in connection to an attempted coup.
Outcome:
Convicted on insurrection-related charges.
Significance:
Showed prosecution of insurrection outside traditional wartime contexts, including domestic political violence.
Legal Principles in Insurrection Prosecutions
Intent and Willfulness:
The defendant must willfully engage in or incite rebellion against government authority.
Use of Force or Violence:
Insurrection typically requires violent or forceful opposition, not mere speech or protest.
Scope of Charges:
Often combined with other federal offenses like conspiracy, sedition, or obstruction of justice.
Due Process:
Courts have emphasized the protection of constitutional rights even in insurrection cases (see Ex parte Milligan).
Summary
Insurrection prosecutions are rare but vital for maintaining law and order in the face of violent rebellion against government authority. Recent cases like those from the Capitol riot show vigorous federal enforcement, while historic cases affirm constitutional protections during prosecution.
RELATED Blog
0 comments