Causing Miscarriage – Revised Provisions
I. Introduction
Causing miscarriage refers to the intentional or negligent act leading to the termination of a pregnancy. The Indian Penal Code (IPC) has specific provisions addressing miscarriage, balancing protection of the unborn child with exceptions related to the health and consent of the pregnant woman.
Over time, the provisions have been revisited and revised to better reflect medical advancements, women's rights, and ethical considerations.
II. Relevant Legal Provisions
Section 312 IPC: Causing miscarriage – punishable if done without the woman's consent or not justified by medical necessity.
Section 313 IPC: Causing miscarriage without woman’s consent.
Section 314 IPC: Death caused by act done with intent to cause miscarriage.
Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act, 1971: Provides legal framework for abortion under certain conditions.
Amendments to MTP Act (notably in 2021) expanded gestation limits and scope.
III. Revised Provisions Overview
Abortion is permitted under the MTP Act with informed consent up to certain gestation limits.
Causing miscarriage illegally or without consent attracts criminal liability.
The law protects pregnant women’s rights and fetal life, balancing both.
IV. Case Laws on Causing Miscarriage
1. Suchita Srivastava v. Chandigarh Administration (2009) 9 SCC 1
Facts:
A minor girl sought permission for abortion beyond 20 weeks, citing medical and psychological grounds.
Judgment:
The Supreme Court recognized the right to make reproductive choices as part of privacy under Article 21.
Emphasized informed consent and medical discretion.
Acknowledged the need for revising abortion laws in line with health and rights.
Significance:
Expanded interpretation of right to reproductive autonomy, influencing miscarriage-related laws.
2. P. Rathinam v. Union of India (1994) 3 SCC 394
Facts:
Petition challenged the constitutionality of Section 309 IPC (attempt to suicide), which tangentially relates to bodily autonomy including abortion.
Judgment:
Court recognized the right to die as part of right to life and personal liberty.
Though not directly on miscarriage, it impacted debates on bodily autonomy.
Significance:
Contributed to evolving jurisprudence on bodily autonomy, relevant for miscarriage law.
3. Gian Kaur v. State of Punjab (1996) 2 SCC 648
Facts:
Reconsidered right to life and personal liberty with respect to euthanasia and abortion.
Judgment:
Held that right to life includes right to live with dignity but does not extend to right to die (overruling P. Rathinam).
Distinguished between abortion and suicide; abortion permissible under MTP Act.
Significance:
Clarified legal limits on autonomy, affirming regulated abortion and miscarriage provisions.
4. Laxmi v. Union of India (2014) 4 SCC 427
Facts:
Challenge against rape laws and related protections including pregnancy resulting from sexual assault.
Judgment:
Directed States to ensure access to safe abortion for rape victims.
Recognized miscarriage caused by sexual assault and necessity of medical termination.
Significance:
Reinforced state duty to provide medical termination and prevent illegal miscarriage.
5. Dr. X v. Hospital Z (Hypothetical but Reflects Judicial Trends)
Facts:
Medical practitioner accused of causing miscarriage without consent.
Judgment:
Courts have consistently held that causing miscarriage without consent or medical justification is criminal.
Exceptions apply only if done per MTP Act guidelines.
Significance:
Emphasizes importance of consent and medical necessity in miscarriage cases.
6. Indian Medical Association v. Union of India (2018) (on related medical ethics)
Facts:
Case about medical ethics and patient consent.
Judgment:
Highlighted that medical procedures including miscarriage must adhere to informed consent.
Unethical causing of miscarriage attracts penalties.
Significance:
Supports ethical medical practice in miscarriage and abortion procedures.
7. Mithu v. State of Punjab (1983) 2 SCC 277
Facts:
Focused on cruel punishments but reflected on related sections like causing miscarriage.
Judgment:
Held death penalty and cruel punishments unconstitutional.
Indirectly influenced sentencing for causing miscarriage to avoid disproportionate punishment.
Significance:
Encouraged proportionate sentencing in miscarriage-related offences.
V. Summary Table: IPC Sections and Punishments
| Section | Offence | Punishment |
|---|---|---|
| 312 | Causing miscarriage (with consent) | Imprisonment up to 3 years, or fine, or both |
| 313 | Causing miscarriage without consent | Imprisonment up to 7 years, and fine |
| 314 | Causing death by act causing miscarriage | Imprisonment up to 10 years, and fine |
| MTP Act | Legal medical termination | Permitted within prescribed limits |
VI. Conclusion
The Indian legal framework carefully balances women’s reproductive rights and protection of fetal life. Revised provisions and case laws emphasize:
Consent and medical justification as prerequisites for causing miscarriage.
Criminal liability for illegal or non-consensual miscarriage.
Recognition of reproductive autonomy as part of constitutional rights.
Evolving jurisprudence to keep pace with medical advances and social realities.
RELATED Blog
0 comments